Dijital Dönüşüm ve Sağlık Ekonomisi: Dijital Sağlık Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sağlık ekonomisi çerçevesinde dijital sağlık alanına yönelik yapılan çalışmaları bütüncül bir yaklaşım ile incelemek ve bu çalışmaların araştırma eğilimlerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda dijital sağlık alanındaki yayınlar bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada Scopus veri tabanı tercih edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda 1985-2023 döneminde yer alan çalışmalar R programlama dili aracılığı ile analiz edilerek geriye dönük (retrospektif) tipte bir çalışma yapılmıştır. İlgili taramalar sonucunda yazım dili İngilizce olan 309 akademik çalışma elde edilmiştir. Çalışmalar yıllara göre dağılım, çalışma sayıları ve türleri, en üretken yazarla, en çok tekrar eden kelimeler, en çok akademik yayın yapan ülkeler ve kurumlar gibi çeşitli kategorilerde incelenmiş ve yayınların kavramsal, entelektüel ve sosyal çerçeveleri belirlenip ifade edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara göre en çok öne çıkan kavramlar inovasyon, sağlık hizmetleri, dijital sağlık, e-sağlık ve COVID-19 kavramlarıdır. Bu çalışma COVID-19 pandemi sürecinin etkilerini de içinde barındırmakta ve güncel literatürü ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bağlamda bu çalışma sağlık ekonomisi ve dijital sağlık alanına ilişkin güncel konular sunması nedeniyle önemli bir kaynak niteliğindedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Dijitalleşme, İnovasyon, Sağlık Ekonomisi, Dijital Sağlık, Bibliyometrik Analiz

Digital Transformation and Health Economics: A Bibliometric Analysis on Digital Health

The aim of this study is to examine the studies on digital health within the framework of health economics with a holistic approach and to reveal the research trends of these studies. For this purpose, publications in the field of digital health were analyzed using the bibliometric analysis method. Scopus database was preferred in the study. In this context, the studies in the 1985-2023 period are analyzed using the R programming language, and this is a retrospective type of research. As a result of the relevant searches, 309 academic studies whose language is English were obtained. The studies were examined in various categories such as the distribution by years, the number and types of studies, the most productive author, the most repetitive words, the countries and institutions with the most academic publications, and the conceptual, intellectual and social frameworks of the publications were determined and tried to be expressed. According to the findings obtained as a result of the analysis, the most prominent concepts are innovation, health services, digital health, e-health and COVID 19 concepts. This study includes the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic process and presents the current literature. In this context, this study is an important resource as it presents current issues in the field of health economics and digital health.

Keywords:

Digitalization, Inovation, Health Economics, Digital Health, Bibliometric Analysis,

PDF

___

1. Kamer, H. ve Sancar, O. (2022). “Yeni Bilişim Teknolojilerinin Sağlıktaki Yeri. Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Dijitalleşme ve Geleceği”, Ankara.
2. Scaletti, A. (2014). “The Evolution of Decisional Logic in the Healthcare System Evaluating Investments in Health Care Systems”. Springer. 1, 1-17.
3. Williams, P.A, Lovelock, B, Cabarrus, T. and Harvey, M. (2019). “Improving Digital Hospital Transformation: Development of an Outcomes-Based Infrastructure Maturity Assessment Framework”. JMIR Medical Informatics, 7 (1), 1-10.
4. Scheplitz, T, Kaczmarek, S. and Benedict, M. (2019). “The Critical Role of Hospital Information Systems in Digital Health Innovation Projects”. 2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).
5. Mbunge, E, Muchemwa, B, Jiyane S. and Batani, J. (2021). “Sensors ve Healthcare 5.0: Transformative Shift in Virtual Care Through Emerging Digital Health Technologies”. Global Health Journal, 5, 169-177.
6. Gleiss, A. and Lewandowski, S. (2021). “Removing Barriers for Digital Health through Organizing Ambidexterity in Hospitals”. Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice, 30, 21-35.
7. Singh, H.A. (2017). “Digital Health: A Call for Government Leadership and Cooperation between ICT and Health”. Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. Erişim adresi: https://www.novartisfoundation.org/sites/novartisfoundation_org/files/2020-11/2017-digital-health-a-call-for-government-leadership-infographic.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 22.10.2022).
8. Sikandar, H, Abbas, A, Khan, N. and Qureshi, M.I. (2022). “Digital Technologies in Healthcare: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis”. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 18 (08), 34-48.
9. Krauskopf, E. (2018). “A Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Infection and Public Health: 2008–2016”. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 11 (2), 224-229.
10. Donthu, N, Kumar, S, Mukherjee, D, Pandey, N. and Lim, W. M. (2021). “How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines”. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
11. Zupic, I. and Cater, T. (2015). “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization”. Organizational Research Methods, 18 (3), 429-472.
12. Çavuşgil Köse, B. (2020). “Turizm ve COVID-19: Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz Yaklaşımı”. Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research, 5, 99-111.
13. Daunno, T, Sutton, R. I. and Price, R.H. (1991). “Isomorphism and External Support in Conflicting Institutional Environments: A study of Drug Abuse Treatment Units”. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 636-661.
14. Bloom, G, Standing, H. ve Lloyd, R. (2008). “Markets, Information Asymmetry and Health Care: Towards New Social Contracts”. Social Science and Medicine, 66 (10), 2076–2087.
15. Iriart, C, Merhy, E.E. ve Waitzkin, H. (2001). “Managed Care in Latin America: the New Common Sense in Health Policy Reform”. Social Science and Medicine, 52 (8), 1243-1253.
16. Heward, S, Hutchins, C. and Keleher, H. (2007). “Organizational Change-Key to Capacity Building and Effective Health Promotion”. Health Promotion International, 22 (2), 170-178.
17. Ta, V.D, Liu, C.M. and Nkabinde, G.W. (2016). “Big Data Stream Computing in Healthcare Real-Time Analytics”. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA) IEEE, 37-42.
18. Bygstad, B. (2017). “Generative Innovation: A Comparison of Lightweight and Heavyweight IT”. Journal of Information Technology, 32 (2), 180-193.
19. Consoli, D. and Mina, A. (2009). “An Evolutionary Perspective on Health Innovation Systems”. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19 (2), 297-319.
20. Bessant, J. and Maher, L. (2009). “Developing Radical Service Innovations in Healthcare-The Role of Design Methods”. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13 (04), 555-568.
21. Harland, C.M. and Knight, L.A. (2001), "Supply Network Strategy: Role and Competence Requirements". International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21 (4), 476-489.
22. Windrum, P, Schartinger, D, Rubalcaba, L, Gallouj, F. and Toivonen, M. (2016). “The Co-Creation of Multi-Agent Social Innovations: A Bridge Between Service and Social Innovation Research”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19 (2), 150-166.
23. Chen, S, Tian, D, Law, R. and Zhang, M. (2021). “Bibliometric and Visualized Review of Smart Tourism Research”. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24 (2), 298–307.
24. Kurutkan, M.N. ve Orhan, F. (2018). Bilim Haritalama, Bibliyometrik Analiz ve Kitap ile İlgili Genel Hususlar (Der.). Sağlık Politikası Konusunun Bilim Haritalama Teknikleri ile Analizi. Ankara: IKSAD Publishing House.
25. Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017). “Bibliometrix: an R-Tool For Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis”. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (4), 959-975.
26. Yalçınkaya, M.H. ve Dilber, İ. (2020). “Sağlık Ekonomisi: Sağlıkta Dönüşüm ve Fırsatlar” Ankara: İksad Yayınevi.