ANTİ-DAMPİNG SÖZLEŞMELERİNİN ETKİSİNİN ULUSLARARASI TİCARİ İLİŞKİLERE VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKE OLARAK TÜRKİYE’DEKİ UYGULAMALARININ TARTIŞILMASI

Son yıllardaki teknoloji, ulaşım ve iletişim alanlarındaki global gelişmelerin etkisi ile birlikte, dünya ticaret hacminde bir patlama yaşanmıştır. İşte bu noktada, globalleşmenin ve liberal ekonomik politikaların uluslararası ticaret hususunda kilit bir rol oynadığı söylenebilir. Şüphesiz, gelişmekte olan ülkeler bakımından, uluslararası ticaret üzerindeki dampinge karşı yapılan anlaşmalar kırılgan bir rol oynamaktadır. Dünya Ticaret Örgütü üyesi ve gelişmekte olan bir ülke olarak Türkiye, damping karşı yapılan anlaşmalar noktasında önemli bir pozisyona sahiptir. Söz konusu bu makale, Anti-Damping Anlaşmalarının hem negatif yönünü hem de pozitif yönünü Türkiye ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler açısından değerlendirecektir

DISCUSSING THE EFFECTS OF ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENT ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE RELATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATIONS IN TURKEY AS A DEVELOPING COUNTRY

Within the effects of global improvements in technology, transportation and communication, the world trade volume has boomed for the last few decades. At this point, it can be said that the globalisation and the liberal economic policies have had crucial role for the world trade relations. Undoubtedly, the Effects of Anti-Dumping Agreements on International Trade have fragile role for developing countries. Turkey, as a developing country and WTO member, has significant position regarding the Anti-Dumping Agreements. This article will analyse both positive and negative effects of the Anti-Dumping Agreements for Turkey and developing countries

___

  • Legislations, Reports and Agreements • ‘ Committee of Anti-dumping Practices,G/AD- P/6,Recommendation Concerning the Per,ods of Data Collection for Anti-dumping Investiga- tions, Adopted by the Commission on 5 May , Worl Trade Organization, 16 May 2000, para 1(a)’ < https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/
  • FE_Search/FE_S_S009-1.aspx?language=E&Cata- logueIdList=44627&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=0&
  • FullTextSearch=G%2fADP%2f6 > • ‘An enabling environment for development: the contribution of the multilateral trading system’ (2 July 1997) < http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/ pres97_e/ecosoc.htm >
  • • ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 No- vember 2009 on protection against dumped im- ports from countries not members of the European
  • Community (codified version)’, Official Journal of the European Journal, 2009 L 343/51.
  • • ‘Çin Üzerine Soru Önergesi’, < http://www. tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tbmm_internet.ara- ma?q=çin%20kota > • ‘Pre-WTO Texts’, ‘Kennedy Round Codes’ < http:// www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/prewto_le- gal_e.htm • ‘The Legislation on Prevention of Unfair Competi- tion in Importatıon’, < http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ MevzuatMetin/1.5.3577.pdf >
  • • ‘The WTO Secretariat report, Trade Policy Review: Turkey’ , < http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/ tpr_e/s259_sum_e.pdf > • ‘WTO secretariat reports further declines in both new anti-dumping investigations and new final an- ti-dumping measures’, < http://www.wto.org/en- glish/news_e/pres06_e/pr441_e.htm > • Antalya Milletvekili Sn. Nail KAMACI tarafından verilen soru önergesi ’, < http://www2.tbmm.gov. tr/d22/7/7-12786c.pdf >
  • • T.C. Resmi Gazete, İthalatta Haksız Rekabetin Önlenmesine İlişkin Tebliğ (Tebliğ No:2012/2)
  • ?home=http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskil- er/2012/01/20120125.htm&main=http://www.re- smigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/01/20120125.htm >
  • • T.C. Resmi Gazete, İthalatta Haksız Rekabetin Önlenmesine İlişkin Tebliğ (Tebliğ No:2012/17)
  • ?home=http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskil- er/2012/08/20120807.htm&main=http://www.re- smigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/08/20120807.htm >
  • • WTO, Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Anti-Dumping Agreement), < http://www. wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/analytic_index- _e/anti_dumping_04_e.htm#article16 > Articles • ‘Developing Countries’. (2001), Policy Issues in
  • International Trade and Commodities Study Series No.9, at 1. • Krugman P. (1995), ‘Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences’ Brookings Papers on Economic
  • Activity, Vol. 1995, No. 1, 25th Anniversary Issue, p.328 < http://www.giszpenc.com/globalciv/krug- man1.pdf>
  • • Moore M. O. (2007),‘Antidumping Reform in the WTO: A Pessimistic Appraisal’, Pacific Economic Re- view, 12:3.
  • • Niel J., ‘Managing the Challenges of WTO Partic- ipation: Case Study, the Reform of South African’s Regime’, < http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/ booksp_e/casestudies_e/case38_e.htm > • Niels G., Kate A.ten. (2006), ‘Antidumping policy in developing countries: Safety valve or obstacle to free trade’? European Journal of Political Economy , at 628 Books
  • • Trebilcock M., Howse R., Eliason A. (2012), ‘The Reg- ulation of International Trade’, Routledge 4th edn
  • • Türkcan K. & Dişbudak C. (2005), ‘Antidamping
  • Uygulamalarının Ekonometrik Analizi: Türkiye Ör- negi’, İktisat,İşletme ve Finans Sayı 233 (Ek Sayı ), Agustos. • Vandenbussche H. & Zanardi M. (2006),‘The
  • Global Chilling Effects of Antidumping Prolifera- tion’,C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. • BOSSCHE Van den (2008), The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization , Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2nd ed.
  • • Cansu B. H. (1998), “Haksız Rekabet Ve Antidamp- ing Sorusturması”, Asomedya , Haziran 1998 at.11
  • • Jessen P. W. (2012), ‘Anti-Dumping’ in Olsen, Bir- gitte E. Steinicke M. &Sorensen K. E. (edn), ‘WTO
  • LAW From a European Perspective’ , Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands. • Karabulut K. ‘Özal Dönemi Türkiye’ nin Ekonomi Politiği’ • Moore, M. O. & Zanardi M. (2006), ‘Does Anti- dumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization’
  • George Washington University. • Şahin F. (2004), “ Tekstil Sektörü Ve 2005 Çin Sen- dromu”, İşveren, Cilt 42, Sayı 6, Mart 2004, p.4
  • • Tan, M. (2008),“DTÖ Kuralları:Anti-Damping,Süb- vansiyonlar ve Türkiye” in Sait Akman & Şahin Ya- man (ed), Dünya Ticaret Örgütü: Doha Çok Taraflı