Gülçin BÜYÜKÖZKAN, Merve GÜLER

4912

Lojistik 4.0 Teknolojilerinin Analizi için Metodolojik Yaklaşım

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Lojistik 4.0 kapsamında var olan teknolojiler hakkında bilgi vermek, firmaların bu teknolojilerden beklentilerini sıralamak ve teknoloji analizi için etkin bir yöntem sunmak amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Firmaların beklentileri bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci AHS yöntemi ile derecelendirilmiş, var olan teknolojilerin seçimi bulanık etki matrisi yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Önerilen yöntem bir lojistik firması için uygulanmıştır. Lojistik sektörü firma beklentileri dikkate alındığında büyük veri ve nesnelerin interneti teknolojilerinin firmalara etkilerinin büyük olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç ve Öneriler: Lojistik 4.0’ı doğru benimseyen ve etkin uygulayan firmalar büyük rekabet avantajı sağlayacağı için bu kapsamda var olan teknolojiler sistematik bir biçimde analiz edilmelidir. Özgün Değer: Bu çalışma, yeni bir model sunması ve etkin bir metodoloji önermesi açısından Lojistik 4.0 kapsamında var olan teknolojilerin analizini sağlayan özgün bir çalışmadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Dijital Teknolojiler, Lojistik 4.0, Teknoloji Analizi, Bulanık Mantık.

A Methodological Approach for Logistics 4.0 Technology Analysis

Purpose: This study aims to give information about technologies that exist within logistics 4.0 concept, to list firms' expectations and to provide an effective methodogy for technology analysis. Methodology: Firms' expectations are graded by fuzzy analytical hierarchy process AHP method, existing technologies are selected by fuzzy effect matrix method. Findings: The proposed method is applied to logistics company. Big data and internet of things have great effect on expectations of companies. Practical Implications: Since firms that adopt logistics 4.0 correctly will survive in competitive environment, it is necessary to systematically analyze existing technologies. Originality: This is an original study that provides analysis of existing technologies within logistics 4.0 concept in terms of offering a new model and proposing an effective methodology.
Keywords:

Digital technologies, Logistics 4.0, Technology analysis, Fuzzy logic.,

PDF

___

  • Al, E, Özsalih, E., Yenipazarlı, B.M. (2017), “Uygulama Örnekleri İle Neden Lojistik 4.0”, Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Ulusal Kongresi, 26-27 Ekim 2017, İstanbul, 53.
  • Avcı, C., Aydın, N. (2017), “Sürücüsüz Araçların Gelişimi ve Gelecek Vizyonu”, Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Ulusal Kongresi, 26-27 Ekim 2017, İstanbul, 13.
  • Bahadır, B., Büyüközkan, G. (2016), “Robot Selection for Warehouses”, XIV. International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress, 1-2 December 2016, İzmir, 341-349.
  • Barreto, L., Amaral, A., Pereira, T. (2017), “Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview”, Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1245-1252.
  • Beg, I., Rashid, T. (2013), TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(12), 1162-1171.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics Report (2015)
  • Büyüközkan, G. (2016), Tedarik Zinciri 4.0 Teknolojileri. Lojistik Dergisi, 16-19. 37.sayı, www.loder.org.tr
  • Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G. (2012), “A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2341-2354.
  • Büyüközkan, G., Güler, M., Uztürk, D. (2016), “Selection of Wearable Glasses in the Logistics Sector”, ”, XIV. International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress, 1-2 December 2016, İzmir, 377-385.
  • Cheng, C. H., Mon, D. L. (1994), “Evaluating weapon system by analytical hierarchy process based on fuzzy scales”, Fuzzy sets and systems, 63(1), 1-10.
  • Chiarello, F., Trivelli, L., Bonaccorsi, A., Fantoni, G. (2018), “Extracting and mapping industry 4.0 technologies using wikipedia”, Computers in Industry, 100, 244-257. Cisco Report (2016)
  • Çelebi, D., İmre, Ş. (2017), “Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemlerinde Veri Gereksinimlerinin Belirlenmesi İçin Bir Yazın Araştırması”, Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Ulusal Kongresi, 26-27 Ekim 2017, İstanbul, 4.
  • Delfino, A., Damiani, L., Revetria, R., Maurizio, S. (2017), “Logistics in a Connected World: Industry 4.0 and Open Source Technologies”, World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017, 25-27 October 2017, San Francisco, USA.
  • DHL Augmented Reality Report (2015)
  • DHL Logistics Trend Radar Report, (2016)
  • DHL Logistics Trend Radar Report, (2018)
  • Dong, W., Fudurich, J., Suchanek, L. (2018), ” Digital Transformation in the Service Sector: Insights from Consultations with Firms in Wholesale, Retail and Logistics. Bankofcanada.ca.” https://www.bankofcanada.ca/2017/11/staff-analytical-note-2017-19/
  • Edirisuriya, A., Weerabahu, S., Wickramarachchi, R. (2018, December), “Applicability of Lean and Green Concepts in Logistics 4.0: A Systematic Review of Literature”, In 2018 International Conference on Production and Operations Management Society (POMS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
  • Erokhina, T. B., Mitko, O. A., Troilin, V. V. (2018), “Digital Marketing and Digital Logistics in Consumer Communication”, European Research Studies Journal, 21(Special 2), 861-867.
  • Galindo, L.D. (2016), ”The Challenges of Logistics 4.0 for the Supply Chain Management and the Information Technology”, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Master Tezi, Norveç.
  • Göçmen, E., Erol, R. (2018), “The Transition to Industry 4.0 in one of the Turkısh Logıstıcs Company”, International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 2:1, 76-85.
  • Grefen, P., Hofman, W., Dijkman, R., Veenstra, A., Peters, S. (2018), “An Integrated View on the Future of Logistics and Information Technology”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12485.
  • Heilig, L., Lalla-Ruiz, E., Voß, S. (2017), “Multi-objective inter-terminal truck routing”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 106, 178-202.
  • Hofmann, E., Rüsch, M. (2017), “Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics”, Computers in Industry, 89, 23-34.
  • Hsieh, T. Y., Lu, S. T., Tzeng, G. H. (2004), “Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings”, International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 573–584.
  • Kayikci, Y. (2018), “Sustainability impact of digitization in logistics”, Procedia manufacturing, 21, 782-789.
  • Kazan, H., Özçelik, S. (2017), “Yeni Endüstriyel Devrim ve Lojistik 4.0”, Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Ulusal Kongresi, 26-27 Ekim 2017, İstanbul, 59.
  • Klir, G. (1997), “Fuzzy arithmetic with requisite constraints”, Fuzzy Sets And Systems, 91(2), 165-175.
  • Kunz, D., Schmortte, R. (2016), “Logistics 4.0 – 3 smart, connected, digital”, Ehrhardt+Partner.
  • Lee, A. R. (1999), “Application of modified fuzzy AHP method to analyze boltingsequence of structural joints”, UMI Dissertation Service, A Bell & Howell Company.
  • Lee, C., Lv, Y., Ng, K., Ho, W., (2017), “Design and application of Internet of things-based warehouse management system for smart logistics”, International Journal Of Production Research, 1-16.
  • Micieta, B., Slaszewska, J., Binasova, V., Hercko, J. (2017), “Adaptive Logistics Management And Optiımization Through Artificial Intellıgence”, Communicatıons, 19, 10- 14.
  • Öztemel, E., Gürsev, S. (2018), “Türkiye’de Lojistik Yönetiminde Endüstri 4.0 Etkileri ve Yatırım İmkanlarına Bakış Üzerine Anket Uygulaması”, Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2:157-168.
  • Schmidtke, N., Behrendt, F., Thater, L., Meixner, S. (2018, April), “Technical potentials and challenges within internal Logistics 4.0”, In Logistics Operations Management (GOL), 2018 4th International Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
  • Sternad, M., Lerher, T., Gajsek, B. (2018), “Maturity Levels for Logistics 4.0 Based On Nrw’S Industry 4.0 Maturity Model”, Business Logistics in Modern Management, 18, 695-708.
  • Strandhagen, J. O., Vallandingham, L. R., Fragapane, G., Strandhagen, J. W., Stangeland, A. B. H., Sharma, N. (2017), “Logistics 4.0 and emerging sustainable business models”, Advances in Manufacturing, 5(4), 359-369.
  • Warehouse DC News, (2019), 3 Tech Trends Shaping the Future of Global Logistics
  • Şekkeli, Z. H., Bakan, İ. (2018), “Endüstri 4.0’ın Etkisiyle Lojistik 4.0”, Journal of Life Economics, 5(2), 17-36.
  • Tahiduzzaman, M., Rahman, M., Rahman, M. S. (2017), “Big data and its impact on digitized supply chain management”, Journal of Business Management, 3(9), 196-208.
  • Tijan, E., Aksentijevic’, S., Ivanic’, K., Jardas, M. (2019), “Blockchain Technology Implementation in Logistics”, Sustainability, 11(4), 1185.
  • Timm, I. J., Lorig, F. (2015, December), “Logistics 4.0: a challenge for simulattion”, In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 3118-3119). IEEE Press.
  • TOBB Report, (2018), Akıllı Fabrikalar Geliyor
  • Wang, K. (2016, November), “Logistics 4.0 Solution-New Challenges and Opportunities”, In 6th International Workshop of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation. Atlantis Press.
  • Wrobel-Lachowska, M., Wisniewski, Z., Polak-Sopinska, A. (2017, July), “The role of the lifelong learning in logistics 4.0”, In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 402-409). Springer, Cham.
  • Wu, H., Tzeng, G., Chen, Y. (2009), ”A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard”, Expert Systems With Applications, 36(6), 10135-10147.
  • Yüksel, H. (2016), Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde dijitalleşmenin önemi. http://www. lojistikhatti.com/haber/2016/01/tedarik-zinciri-yonetiminde-dijitallesmenin-onemi Zadeh, L. A. (1965), Fuzzy sets, Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.
  • Zheng, X., & Ren, J. (2016, October), “Effectiveness Evaluation Method for Digital Logistics Equipment System of Systems”, In 2016 4th International Conference on Mechanical Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. Atlantis Press.
Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-5792
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Proje Yönetiminde Zaman ve Maliyet Odaklı Bütünleşik Planlama Yaklaşımı ve Bir Uygulama

Aslı AKSOY, Mehmet AKANSEL, Canberk ATALAY, Atalay Meriç ÇAMLIBEL, Dilara YAŞAR, Duygu KESEROĞLU, Serdar VANLIOĞLU

Mekâna ve Firmaya Özgü Yetkinliklerin İnovasyon Performansı Üzerine Etkileri: Antalya Teknokent Örneği

Tugba GURCAYLILAR-YENİDOGAN, Seda Aslı YAVUZ

Lojistik 4.0 Teknolojilerinin Analizi için Metodolojik Yaklaşım

Gülçin BÜYÜKÖZKAN, Merve GÜLER

Kültürel Değişimin Ülkelerin Girişimcilik Faaliyetleri Üzerindeki Etkisi

Sema YİĞİT, Murat GÖK