İnovasyon Fikirleri için Portföy Yönetimi: Öncüllerin AHP ile Ağırlıklandırılması

Amaç: Çalışmada başlangıç aşamasında fikirlerin değerlendirilmesi için inovasyonun öncülleri araştırılmış ve ağırlıkları belirlenmiştir. Yöntem: İnovasyon çıktısının öncülleri sistematik literatür taraması ile derlenmiş, daha sonra bu başlıklar TİM InoSuit projesinin katılımcılılarından seçilmiş uzman ve akademisyenlerden oluşan karma bir ekip tarafından doğrulanarak ağırlıkları analitik hiyerarşik süreç ile belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Öncüller, değer, uygulanabilirlik, inovasyona katkı, genelleme, strateji, risk ve var olan çözümün uygunluğu olarak derlenmiş, ağırlıkları da sırasıyla % 12, 15, 10, 18, 8, 32 ve 5 olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuç ve Öneriler: Bu çalışmada inovasyon yönetim sistemlerinde kullanılabilecek, ön safhalarda inovasyon fikirlerinin seçimine imkân sunan analitik bir değerlendirme modeli sunulmuştur. Özgün Değer: Literatürde fikir oluşturmanın ön safhaları için karşılaştırılabilir benzerlikte başka bir ölçek bulunamamıştır.

Portfolio management for innovation ideas: weighing antecedents with AHP

Companies need to innovate to remain competitive. It enables the cope of change by new products, services or processes. However, continuous innovation is not an easy task. Hence, innovation management systems are being implemented, supporting ideation and successive idea selection at early stages on the front end of new product development and process re-/design. This is a complex task, requiring portfolio management subject to systematic multiple criteria assessment. Thus, first the antecedents of the innovation output are outlined with literature research verified by selected participants of TIM’s InoSuit project. Then, the weights of these items are determined by this integrated team of experts and academicians using AHP delivering the basis for the analytical assessment for the initial idea selection.

___

  • Achiche S., Appio F.P., McAloone T.C., and Minin A.D. (2013), “Fuzzy decision support for tools selection in the core front end activities of new product development”, Research in Engineering Design, 24(1), 1-18.
  • Ahmed-Kristensen S. and Daalhuizen J. (2015), “Pioneering the combined use of agile and stage-gate models in new product development: cases from the manufacturing industry”, in: Proceedings of the 22nd Innovation & Product Development Management Conference. 14 -16 June 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Alonso, J.A. and Lamata, M.T. (2006), “Consistency in the Analytic hierarchy process: a new approach”, International Journal of Uncertainty: Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,14(4), 445-459.
  • Amit R. and Zott C. (2012), “Creating value through business model innovation”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41-49.
  • Andrew J.P., Manget J., Michael D.C., Taylor A., and Zblit H. (2010), A return to prominence – and the emergence of a new world order, BCG Most Innovative Companies. The Boston Consulting Group.
  • Arshinder, K., Kanda, A., and Deshmukh, S.G. (2007), “Coordination in supply chains: an evaluation using fuzzy logic”, Production Planning and Control, 18(5), 420- 435.
  • AT Kearny, 2017. Innovation – A.T. Kearney. The IMP³rove – European Innovation Management Academy. [Online] atkearney.com.tr/innovation, (Access: 08.01.2018). Ayag, Z. (2005), “A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment”, IIE Transactions, 37(9), 827–842.
  • Bear, D.J. (2006), “The quest for innovation: a global study of innovation management, 2006-2016”, American Management Association, [online] amanet.org/ images/hri_innovation.pdf, (Access: 20.12.2017).
  • Bengtsson, M. and Sölvell, Ö. (2004), “Climate of competition, clusters and innovative performance”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(3), 225-244.
  • Bhidé, A. (2009), “Where innovation creates value”, McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. Feb 2009, [online] mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/ourinsights/where-innovation-creates-value, (Access: 01.12.2017).
  • Bower, J.L. and Christensen, C.M. (1995), “Disruptive technologies: catching the wave”, Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 43–53.
  • Bozbura, F.T., Beskese, A. and Kahraman, C. (2007), “Prioritization of organizational capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP”, Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1100-1112.
  • Börjesson, S., Dahlsten, F., and Williander, M. (2006), “Innovative scanning experiences from an idea generation project at Volvo Cars”, Technovation, 26(7), 775- 783.
  • Brem, A. and Voigt, K.I. (2009), “Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management - insights from the German software industry”, Technovation, 29(5), 351-367.
  • de Brentani, U. and Reid, S.E. (2012), “The Fuzzy front-end of discontinuous innovation: insights for research and management”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 70-87.
  • Bröring, S., Cloutier, L.M., and Leker, J. (2006), “The front end of innovation in an era of industry convergence: evidence from nutraceuticals and functional foods”, R&D Management, 36(5), 487-498.
  • Burgelman, R.A. and Sayles, L.R. (2004), “Transforming invention into innovation: the conceptualization stage”, in: Christensen, C.M., Wheelwright, S.C. (Eds.), Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. McGraw-Hill, Boston, pp.682–690.
  • Calantone, R.J., di Benedetto, A., and Schmidt, J.B. (1999), “Using the analytic hierarchy process in new product screening”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(1), 65–76.
  • Calantone, R. J., Randhawa, P., and Voorhees, C. M. (2014), “Breakeven time on new product launches: an investigation of the drivers and impact on firm performance”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(S1), 94–104.
  • Cornetto T., Nisar A., Palacios M., Meunier-FitzHugh K., and Labadie J.G. (2016), “Organizational linkages for new product development: Implementation of innovation projects”, Journal of Business Research, vol.69, 2093-2100.
  • CEN/TS (2013), CEN/TC 389 Innovation Management, Part 1: Innovation Management System. Technical Specification of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), CEN/TS 16555-1.
  • Chao, R.O. and Kavadias, S. (2008), “A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets”, Management Science, 54(5), 907-921.
  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2006), Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press. Cooper RG. (1990), “Stage-gate systems: a new tools for managing new products”, Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-54.
  • Cooper, R.G. (2003), “Your NPD portfolio may be harmful to your business’s health”, Research Technology Management, 47(1), 31-43.
  • Cooper, R.G. (2008), “Perspective: The stage‐gate® idea‐to‐launch process— update, what’s new, and nexgen systems”, Journal of product innovation management, 25(3), 213-232.
  • Cooper R. and Edgett S. (2008), “Ideation for product innovation: what are the best methods?”, PDMA Visions Magazine wp#29, 1(1), 12-17.
  • Cooper RG. (2009), “How companies are reinventing their idea-to-launch methodologies”, Research Technology Management, 52(2), 47-57.
  • Cooper, R.G. (2011), “Perspective: The innovation dilemma: how to innovate when the market is mature”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 2-27.
  • Deppe L., Kohn S., Paoletti F., and Levermann A. (2002), “The holistic view of the front end of innovation”, in: Proceeding of IMTs and New Product Development Conference, 17-18 October 2002, Mantova, Italy.
  • Dewulf, K. (2013), “Sustainable product innovation: the importance of the front-end stage in the innovation process”, in: Advances in Industrial Design Engineering, edited by Denis A. Coelho, CC-BY-3.0.
  • Eliens L. (2015), Disentagling the fuzzy front-end: an integrative literature review. Dissertation, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto. [online] repositorioaberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/79627/2/35840.pdf, (Access: 10.11.2017).
  • Forman, E.H. (1990), “Random indices for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices”, European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 153-155.
  • Gatignon, H, and Robertson, T.S. (1991), “Innovative decision processes”, in Handbook of consumer behavior, 316(8). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Goepel, K.D. (2013), AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process: EVM multiple inputs (CC BYNC 3.0 SG). Singapore: BPMSG, 2013. [online] bpmsg.com, (Access: 01.12.2017).
  • Grant, K., Alefantos, T., Meyer, M., and Edgar D. (2013), “Capturing and measuring technology based service innovation – a case analysis within theory and practice”, International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 899– 905.
  • Gronlund, J., Sjodin D.R., and Frishammar, J. (2010), “Open innovation and the stagegate process: a revised model for new product development”, California Management Review, 52(3), 106-131.
  • Hansen, M.T. and Nohria, N. (2004), “How to build collaborative advantage”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 22-30.
  • Hansen, M.T. and Birkinshaw, J. (2007), “The innovation value chain”, Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 121-130.
  • Hart, S., Hultink, E.J., Tzokas, N., and Commandeur, H.R. (2003), “Industrial companies’ evaluation criteria in new product development gates”, Journal of Product Innovation Management. 20(1), 22-36.
  • Herstatt C., Stockstrom C., Verworn B., and Nagahira A. (2006), “Fuzzy front end practices in innovating Japanese companies”, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 3(1), 43-60.
  • Hirunyawipada , T., Paswan , A.K., and Blankson, C. (2015), “Toward the development of new product ideas: asymmetric effects of team cohesion on new product ideation”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(7), 855-866.
  • Hsiao, S.W. (2002), “Concurrent design method for developing a new product”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 29(1), 41–55.
  • Huang, C.C., Chu, P.Y., and Chiang, Y.H. (2008), “A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection”, Omega, 36(6), 1038-1052.
  • Humphrey, J. and Schmitz, H. (2002), “How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?”, Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027.
  • Innovation (2017), [Def. 1,2] in Merriam Webster Online, Retrieved March 15, 2017, [Online] merriam-webster.com/dictionary/innovation.
  • Ishizaka, A. and Labib, A. (2011), “Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345.
  • Iyer, R., Laplaca, P.J., and Sharma, A. (2006), “Innovation and new product introductions in emerging markets: strategic recommendations for the Indian market”, Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 373–382.
  • Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., and Augier, M. (2006), “Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures”, Research Policy, 35(8), 1200-1221.
  • Jou G.T. and Yuan B.J.C. (2016), “Utilizing a novel approach at the fuzzy front-end of new product development: a case study in a flexible fabric supercapacitor”, Sustainability, 8(8)740, 18 pages.
  • Johnson, S. (2010), Where good ideas come from: the natural history of innovation. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
  • Jörgensen, J.H., Bergenholtz, C., Goduscheit, R.C., and Rasmussen, E.S. (2011), “Managing inter-firm collaboration in the fuzzy front-end: structure as a two-edged sword”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), 145-163.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. and Ruan, D. (2004), “Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey”, International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 171-184.
  • Kim, J. and Wilemon, D. (2002), “Focusing the fuzzy front end in new product development”, R&D Management, 32(4), 269–279.
  • Kock A., Heising W., and Gemünden H.G. (2015), “How ideation portfolio management influences front-end success”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(4), 539-555.
  • Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D’Amore, R., Elkins, C., Herald, K., Incorvia, M., Johnson, A., and Karol, R. (2001), “Providing clarity and a common language to the fuzzy front end”, Research-Technology Management, 44(2), 46-55.
  • Koen, P. (2004), “The Fuzzy Front End for Incremental, Platform, and Breakthrough Products”, in: PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, 2nd Edition (by K.B. Kahn), Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kurt, O.E., Ucler, C., and Vayvay, O. (2017), “From ideation towards innovation: pillars of front-end in new product development”, Press Academia Procedia. 5, pp.71-79.
  • Lewis, M.O. and Elaver, R. (2014), “Managing and fostering creativity: an integrated approach”, The International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), 235-247.
  • Liu, H.T. (2011), “Product design and selection using fuzzy QFD and fuzzy MCDM approaches”, Applied Mathematical Modelling. 35, 482–496.
  • Loch, C.H. and Kavadias, S. (2002), “Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns”, Management Science, 48(10), 1227-1241.
  • Martinsuo, M. and Poskela, J. (2011), “Use of evaluation criteria and innovation performance in the front end of innovation”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 896–914.
  • Mohanty, R.P. and Deshmukh, S.G. (1993), “Using of analytic hierarchic process for evaluating sources of supply”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 23(3), 22-28.
  • Morris, L. (2011), The innovation master plan: the CEO’s guide to innovation. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: Innovation Academy.
  • Narasimhan, R. (1983), “An analytical approach to supplier selection”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19(4), 27-32.
  • Nagji, B. and Tuff, G. (2012), “Managing Your Innovation Portfolio”, Harvar Businedss Review, 90(5), 66-74.
  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., and Konno, N. (2000), “SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation”. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5-34.
  • Nonaka, I. and Toyama, R., and Hirata, T. (2008), Managing Flow. A Process Theory of the Knowledge-Based Firm. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nydick, R.L. and Hill, R.P. (1992), “Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(2), 31-36.
  • OECD (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd Edition, Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  • Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010), Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken New Jersey: USA John Wiley & Sons.
  • Palmberg C. (2006), “The sources and success of innovations – determinants of commercialization and break-even times”, Technovation, 26(11), 1253-1267.
  • Pohekar, S.D. and Ramachandran, M. (2004), “Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning-a review”, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 8(4), 365-381.
  • Park W., Lee K., Doo S., and Yoon S. (2016), “Investments for new product development: a break-even time analysis”, Engineering Management Journal, 28(3), 158- 167.
  • Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J., and Probert, D.R. (2004), “Technology roadmapping—a planning framework for evolution and revolution”, Technological forecasting and social change, 71(1), 5-26.
  • Porter, M.E. (1998), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, With a New Introduction. New York: The Free Press.
  • Reypens, C., Lievens, A., and Blazevic, V. (2016), “Leveraging value in multistakeholder innovation networks: A process framework for value co-creation and capture”, Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 40–50.
  • Riel A., Neumann M., and Tichkiewitch S. (2013), “Structuring the early fuzzy frontend to manage ideation for new product development”, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 62(1), 107-110.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1980), The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill. Saaty, T.L. (1990), “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process”, European Journal of Operations Research, 48(1), 9-26.
  • Saaty, T.L. (2003), “Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary?”, European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 85-91.
  • Salomo, S., Weise, J., and Gemünden, H.G. (2007), “NPD planning activities and innovation performance: the mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness”, Journal of product innovation management, 24(4), 285-302.
  • Sandmeier, P., Jamali, N., Kobe, C., Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., and Meier, M. (2004), “Towards a Structured and Integrative Front-End of Product Innovation”, in: R&D Management Conference (RADMA) 2004, 07-09 July 2004, Lissabon.
  • Shiraishi, S., Obata, T., and Daigo, M. (1998), “Properties of a positive reciprocal matrix and their application to AHP”, Journal of the Operations Research, Society of Japan, 41(3), 404-414.
  • Smith, P.G. and Reinertsen, D.G. (1991), Developing Products in Half the Time. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Snyder, A.V. and Ebeling, H.W. (1997), “Targeting a company’s real core competencies”, in: Core Competency Based Strategy, by Campbell, A. and Luchs, S.K., Pennsylvania, US: International Thomson Business Press.
  • Sommer A.F., Hedegaard C., Dukovska-Popovska I., and Steger-Jensen K. (2015), “Improved product development performance through agile/stage-gate hybrids”, Research Technology Management, 58(1), 34-45.
  • Stamm, B.v. (2003), The Innovation Wave: Meeting the Corporate Challenge. England: Wiley & Sons.
  • Stevanovic M., Marjanovic D., and Storga M. (2016), “Idea Management in product innovation – the emprical research results”, Technical Gazette, 23(5), 1285-1294.
  • Tidd, J., Bessant, J., and Pavitt, K. (2005), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons.
  • TIM (2017), InoSuit - Innovation Focused Mentoring Project. Original Title in Turkish: InoSuit - Inovasyon Odaklı Mentörlük Projesi. Istanbul, Turkey: Turkish Exporters Assembly. [Online] tim.org.tr/tr/inosuit.html, (Access: 30.12.2017).
  • Tsekouras G., Meier C., Sutkus A., and Wolf, A. (2014), The smE-MPOWER business innovation roadmap methodology: a methodological approach for establishing in a participative way a roadmap for business innovation in SMEs. Technical Results Paper, smE-MPOWER Project of the EU (ETIS-CT-2005-023401), 12 pages, [online] www.smempower.eu, CC-BY-SA, (Access: 01.12.2017).
  • Ursino G. (2015) “Supply chain control: a theory of vertical integration”, Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 15(4), 1831-1866.
  • Ucler, C. (2017a), “Intelligent assignment in clusters to enhance collaboration and innovation”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(5), 554-576.
  • Ucler, C. (2017b), “Brainstorming the cryoplane layout by using the iterative AHPQFD-AHP approach”, Aviation, 21(2), 55-63.
  • Ulwick, A.W. (2002), “Turn customer input into innovation”, Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 91-97.
  • White, M.A. and Bruton, G.D. (2010), The management of technology and innovation: a strategic approach. 2nd Edition. Mason (OH), USA: Cengage Learning.