Deep Learning-Based Architectures for Recognition of Cow Using Cow Nose Image Pattern

Deep Learning-Based Architectures for Recognition of Cow Using Cow Nose Image Pattern

Stacked denoising auto-encoder and deep belief network are proposed as methods of deeplearning for cow nose image texture feature extraction, and for learning the extracted features forbetter representation. While stacked denoising auto-encoder is applied for encoding and decodingof the extracted features, a deep belief network is applied for learning the extracted features andrepresenting the cow nose image in feature space. Stacked denoising auto-encoder and deep beliefnetwork help in animal biometrics. Biometrics emanated from computer vision and patternrecognition and it plays an important role in the automated animal registration and identificationprocess. Using the visual attributes of cow, and for the fact that the existing visual featureextraction and representation methods are not capable of handling cow recognition; deep beliefnetwork and stacked denoising auto-encoder are proposed. An experiment performed underdifferent conditions of identification indicated that deep belief network outshines other methodswith approximately 98.99% accuracy. 4000 cow nose images from an existing database of 400individual cows contribute to the community of research especially in the animal biometrics foridentification of individual cow.

___

  • Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., Datta, T., Gupta, H.P., “A fast cattle recognition system using smart devices”, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Multimedia, 742–743, (2016).
  • Noviyanto, A., Arymurthy, A.M., “Automatic cattle identification based on muzzle photo using speed-up robust features approach”, Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference of Computer Science, ECCS, 110:114, (2012).
  • Kohl, H.S., Burkhart, T., “Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic Appearance”, Trends Ecol. Evol., 28 (7): 432–441, (2013).
  • Duyck, J., Finn, C., Hutcheon, A., Vera, P., Salas, J., Ravela, S., “Sloop: a pattern retrieval engine for individual animal identification”, Pattern Recogn., 48 (4): 1059–1073, (2015).
  • Nasirahmadi, A., Richter, U., Hensel, O., Edwards, S., Sturm, B., “Using machine vision for investigation of changes in pig group lying patterns”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, (119): 184-190, (2015).
  • Wang, Z., Fu, Z., Chen, W., Hu, J., “A rfid-based traceability system for cattle breeding in china”, in: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), (2): V2–567, (2010).
  • Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G., “ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks”, In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1097–1105, (2012).
  • Incetas, M. O., Demirci, R., Yavuzcan, H. G., “Automatic Color Edge Detection with Similarity Transformation”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 32(2): 458-469, (2019).
  • Sun, Y., Wang, X., Tang, X., “Deep convolutional network cascade for facial point detection”, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit, 3476–3483, (2013).
  • Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., “Visual animal biometrics: survey”, IET Biometrics, 6 (3): 139–156, (2016). Barron, U.G., Butler, F., McDonnell, K., Ward, S., “The end of the identity crisis? Advances in biometric markers for animal identification”, Irish Veterinary J., 62 (3): 204-208, (2009). Reiter, S., Sattlecker, G., Lidauer, L., Kickinger, F., Öhlschuster, M., Auer, W., ..., Iwersen, M., “Evaluation of an ear-tag-based accelerometer for monitoring rumination in dairy cows”, Journal of Dairy Science, 101(4): 3398-3411, (2018).
  • Seijas, C., Montilla, G., Frassato, L., “Identification of Rodent Species Using Deep Learning”, Computación y Sistemas, 23(1): 257, (2019).
  • Hansen, M.F., Smith, M.L., Smith, L.N., Salter, M.G., Baxter, E.M., Farish, M., Grieve, B., “Towards on-farm pig face recognition using convolutional neural networks”, Computers in Industry, 98: 145-152, (2018).
  • Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., “Cattle Recognition: A New Frontier in Visual Animal Biometrics Research”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences 1- 20, (2019).
  • Norouzzadeh, M.S., Nguyen, A., Kosmala, M., Swanson, A., Palmer, M.S., Packer, C., Clune, J., “Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(25): E5716-E5725, (2018).
  • Zin T.T., Phyo, C.N., Tin, P., Hama, H., Kobayashi, I., “Image technology based cow identification system using deep learning”, Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 1, (2018).
  • Kumar, S., Pandey, A., Satwik, K.S.R., Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., Singh, A.K., Mohan, A., “Deep learning framework for recognition of cattle using muzzle point image pattern”, Measurement, 116: 1-17, (2018).
  • Iswanto, I.A., Li, B., “Visual object tracking based on mean-shift and particle-Kalman filter”, Procedia Computer Science, 116: 587-595, (2017).
  • Minagawa, H., Fujimura, T., Ichiyanagi, M., Tanaka, K., Fangquan, M., “Identification of beef cattle by analyzing images of their muzzle patterns lifted on paper”, Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Conference for Information Technology in Asian Agricultural Information Technology & Management, 596–600, (2002).
  • Barry, B., Gonzales-Barron, U., McDonnell, K., Butler, F., Ward, S., “Using muzzle pattern recognition as a biometric approach for cattle identification”, Trans. ASABE, 50 (3): 1073–1080, (2007).
  • Dalal, N., Triggs, B., “Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection”, Proc. CVPR, 1: 886- 893, (2005).
  • Awad, A.I., Zawbaa, H.M., Mahmoud, H.A., Nabi, E.H.H.A., Fayed, R.H., Hassanien, A.E., “A robust cattle identification scheme using muzzle print images”, Proceedings of IEEE Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 529–534, (2013).
  • Noviyanto, A., Arymurthy, A.M., “Beef cattle identification based on muzzle pattern using a matching refinement technique in the sift method”, Comp. Electr. Agr., (99): 77–84, (2013).
  • Kumar S., Tiwari S., Singh S.K., “Face recognition for cattle”, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP), 65–72, (2015).
  • Ehsani, K., Bagherinezhad, H., Redmon, J., Mottaghi, R., Farhadi, A., “Who let the dogs out? modeling dog behavior from visual data”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4051- 4060, (2018).
  • Gaber, T., Tharwat, A., Hassanien, A.E., Snasel, V., “Biometric cattle identification approach based on webers local descriptor and AdaBoost classifier”, Comp. Electr. Agr., (122): 55–66, (2016).
  • Risha, K.P., Chempak, K.A., Sindhu, C.S., “Difference of Gaussian on Frame Differenced Image”. International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Control Engineering, 3(1): 92-95, (2016).
  • Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Lajoie, I., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P.-A., “Stacked denoising autoencoders: learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion”, JMLR (11): 3371–3408, (2010).
  • Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P.A., “Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders”, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1096-1103, (2008). ACM.
  • Bengio, Y., “Learning deep architectures for AI”, Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2(1): 1-127, (2009).
  • Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Vincent, P., “Representation learning: A review and new perspectives,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8): 1798-1828, (2013).