A Comparison of Five Tests for the Equality of Inverse Gaussian Means under Heteroscedasticity of Scale Parameters

A Comparison of Five Tests for the Equality of Inverse Gaussian Means under Heteroscedasticity of Scale Parameters

Analysis of Reciprocals F-test developed by Miura [1] is used to test the equality of InverseGaussian (IG) means based on the assumption of homogeneity of scale parameters. However,this method is not valid when this assumption is not satisfied. There are some methodsdeveloped for comparing the equality of the IG means under heteroscedasticity of scaleparameters. In this study, the goal of this study is to compare these methods under differentcombinations of parameters and various sample sizes. We compare the performances of the fivecommonly used tests in the literature via Monte Carlo simulation study. The tests considered areanalysis of reciprocals (ANORE) F-test, parametric bootstrap approach (PBA), generalized pvalueapproach proposed by Tian (GPA), generalized p-value approach proposed by Shi and Lv(GPSL) and computational approach test (CAT). According to simulation results, GPSL andCAT have satisfactory type I error rates for all parameter combinations. Except for the numberof groups is k=7, when the sample sizes are different and scale parameters are both different andinversely proportional, the power of GPA is higher than the other tests.

___

  • Miura, C.K., “Tests for the mean of the inverse Gaussian distribution”, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 5(4): 200-204, (1978).
  • Welch, B.L., “On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach”, Biometrika, 38(3/4): 330-336, (1951).
  • Şenoğlu, B. and Tiku, M.L., “Analysis of variance in experimental design with nonnormal error distributions”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 30(7): 1335-1352, (2001).
  • Yigit, E. and Gokpinar, F., “A simulation study on tests for one-way ANOVA under the unequal variance assumption”, Commun Fac Sci Univ Ankara, Ser A, 1: 15-34, (2010).
  • Gokpinar, E.Y. and Gokpinar, F., “A test based on the computational approach for equality of means under the unequal variance assumption”, Hacettepe Jour. of Math. and Static, 41(4): 605-613, (2012).
  • Mutlu, H.T., Gökpinar, F., Gökpinar, E., Gül, H.H. and Güven, G., “A New Computational Approach Test for One-Way ANOVA under Heteroscedasticity”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, (just-accepted), (2016). Doi: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1177082.
  • Gokpinar, E. and Gokpinar, F., “Testing equality of variances for several normal populations”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(1): 38-52, (2017).
  • Gokpinar, F. and Gokpinar, E., “Testing the equality of several log-normal means based on a computational approach”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(3): 1998- 2010, (2017).
  • Schrödinger, E., “Zur theorie der fall-und steigversuche an teilchen mit brownscher bewegung”, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 16(1915): 289-295, (191).
  • von Smoluchowski, M., “Notiz uiber die Berechnung der Brownschen Molekularbewegung bei der Ehrenhaft-Millikanschen Versuchsanordning”, Phys. Z, 16, 318-321. (1915).
  • Basak, P. and Balakrishnan, N., “Estimation for the three-parameter inverse Gaussian distribution under progressive Type-II censoring”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 82(7): 1055-1072, (2012).
  • Takagi, K., Kumagai, S. and Kusaka, Y., “Application of inverse Gaussian distribution to occupational exposure data”, The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 41(5): 505-514, (1997).
  • Chang, M., You, X. and Wen, M., “Testing the homogeneity of inverse Gaussian scale-like parameters”, Statistics & Probability Letters, 82(10): 1755-1760, (2012).
  • Fahidy, T.Z., “Applying the inverse Gaussian distribution to the assessment of chemical reactor performance”, International Journal of Chemistry, 4(2): 26, (2012).
  • Chhikara, R.S. and Folks, J.L., The Inverse Gaussian distribution., Marcel Decker. Inc., New York, (1989).
  • Seshadri, V., The inverse Gaussian distribution: a case study in exponential families, Oxford University Press, (1993).
  • Seshadri, V., The inverse Gaussian distribution: statistical theory and applications. Springer, New York, (1999).
  • Tweedie, M.C., “Statistical Properties of Inverse Gaussian Distributions. I”, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28(2): 362-377, (1957).
  • Folks, J.L. and Chhikara, R.S., “The inverse Gaussian distribution and its statistical application--a review”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 40(3): 263-289, (1978).
  • Wasan, M.T., “Monograph on Inverse Gaussian Distribution”, Department of Mathematics, (1966).
  • Mudholkar, G.S. and Natarajan, R., “The inverse Gaussian models: analogues of symmetry, skewness and kurtosis”, Annals of the Institute of statistical Mathematics, 54(1): 138-154, (2002).
  • Bardsley, W.E., “Note on the use of the inverse Gaussian distribution for wind energy applications”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 19(9): 1126-1130, (1980).
  • Balakrishnan, N. and Rahul, T., “Inverse Gaussian distribution for modeling conditional durations in finance”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 43(3): 476-486, (2014).
  • Chhikara, R.S. “Optimum Tests for Comparison of Two Inverse Gaussian Distribution Means1”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 17(2): 77-83, (1975).
  • Davis, A.S. “Use of the likelihood ratio test on the inverse Gaussian distribution”, The American Statistician, 34(2): 108-110, (1980).
  • Samanta, M., “On tests of equality of two inverse Gaussian distributions”, South African Statistical Journal, 19(2): 83-95, (1985)
  • Tian, L., “Testing equality of inverse Gaussian means under heterogeneity, based on generalized test variable”, Computational statistics & data analysis, 51(2): 1156-1162. (2006).
  • Ma, C.X. and Tian, L., “A parametric bootstrap approach for testing equality of inverse Gaussian means under heterogeneity”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 38(6): 1153-1160, (2009).
  • Ye, R.D., Ma, T.F. and Wang, S.G., “Inferences on the common mean of several inverse Gaussian populations”, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54(4): 906-915, (2010).
  • Lin, S.H. and Wu, I.M., “On the common mean of several inverse Gaussian distributions based on a higher order likelihood method”. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217(12): 5480-5490, (2011).
  • Shi, J.H. and Lv, J.L., “A new generalized p-value for testing equality of inverse Gaussian means under heterogeneity”, Statistics & Probability Letters, 82(1): 96-102. (2012).
  • Gökpınar, E.Y., Polat, E., Gokpınar, F. and Günay, S., “A new computational approach for testing equality of inverse Gaussian means under heterogeneity”, Hacettepe journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 42(5): 581-590, (2013).
  • Pal, N., Lim, W.K. and Ling, C.H., “A computational approach to statistical inferences”, Journal of Applied Probability & Statistics, 2(1): 13-35, (2007).
  • Chang, C.H. and Pal, N., “A revisit to the Behrens–Fisher problem: comparison of five test methods”, Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 37(6): 1064-1085, (2008).
  • Chang, C.H., Pal, N., Lim, W.K. and Lin, J.J., “Comparing several population means: a parametric bootstrap method, and its comparison with usual ANOVA F test as well as ANOM”, Computational Statistics, 25(1): 71-95, (2010).
  • Gokpinar, F. and Gokpinar, E., “A computational approach for testing equality of coefficients of variation in k normal populations”, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 44(5): 1197- 1213, (2015).
  • Jafari, A.A. and Abdollahnezhad, K., “Inferences on the Means of Two Log-Normal Distributions: A Computational Approach Test”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 44(7): 1659-1672, (2015).
  • Jafari, A.A. and Kazemi, M.R., “Computational approach test for inference about several correlation coefficients: Equality and common”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(3): 2043-2056, (2017).