Sergileme mekânlarının tasarım performansının artırılmasında kullanılan kriterlerin belirlenmesi için analitik bir yaklaşım

Günümüzde iletişim ve etkileşim mekânları olarak tanımlanan sergileme mekânları aracılığıyla farklıamaçlara yönelik olarak ziyaretçilere çok boyutlu deneyimler sunulmaktadır. Bununla bağlantılı olaraksergileme tasarımı da daha karmaşık hale gelmekte ve gereksinimler sürekli yeniden tanımlanmaya ihtiyaçduymaktadır. Sergileme mekânlarının tasarım başarımı, tasarım sürecinin ön tasarım aşamasında ve diğeraşamalarında çok boyutlu ve karmaşık yapıdaki gereksinimlerin dikkate alınmasını gerektirir. Bu yüzdentasarımcı tarafından tüm gereksinimlerin tespit edilmesi, öngörülmesi ve uygulama aşamasında sağlandığınadair kontrolü gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma kapsamında geçici sergileme mekânlarında mekânsal gereksinimlerbağlamında iç mekan tasarım performansının artırılmasına yönelik kriterlerin tespit edilmesi için analitik biraraştırma yapılmıştır. Yöntem olarak ilk aşamada “sergileme tasarımı” (exhibition design) anahtar kelimelerikullanılarak uluslararası düzeyde literatür taraması yapılmıştır. Bir sonraki aşamada elde edilen kriter verileriyapılan içerik analizleri doğrultusunda kategorize edilerek bir matris oluşturulmuş ve bu matris üzerindesistematik bir şekilde analiz edilmiş ve değerlendirilmiştir. Bu çalışma ile birlikte tasarımcının tasarımsürecinde girdi olarak kullanabileceği geçici sergileme mekânlarının tasarım performansını artırmayayönelik kriterler seti oluşturulmuştur. Bu tür çalışmaların yeniden üretilmesi, sergileme tasarımında tasarımcıperformansını önemli ölçüde artıracak ve gelecek tasarımlar için bilgi ve deneyim paylaşımının güncelsürekliliğini sağlayacaktır.

An analytical approach to identify criteria for enhancement of the design performance in exhibition spaces

Today, multi-dimensional experiences are presented to visitors for different purposes through exhibition spaces, which are defined as communication and interaction spaces. In connection therewith, the exhibition design becomes more sophisticated and the requirements need to be constantly redefined. The design performance of the exhibition spaces requires the consideration of multidimensional and complex requirements during the preliminary and other stages of the design process. Therefore, it is necessary for the designer to identify and anticipate all requirements and control if they are provided during the application phase. Within the scope of this study, an analytical research was conducted in order to identify the criteria for increasing the design performance in terms of spatial requirements in the temporary exhibition spaces. As a method, literature studies were conducted at the international level by using the keywords “exhibition design”. In the next step, the criterion data obtained according to content analysis were categorized, analyzed and evaluated systematically on the matrix that is formed. Together with this study, a set of criterions for the interior design of the temporary exhibition spaces was created which can be used by the designer in the design process. The production of such works will significantly increase designer performance in exhibition design and ensure up-to-date continuity of knowledge and experience sharing for future designs.

PDF

___

1. Kárpáti A.; Vásárhelyi T., Exhibition Communication: Translation and Adaptation from the Hungarian Original, Eötvös Loránd University, 2013.
2. Locker P., İç Mekân Tasarımında Stant Tasarımı ve Sergileme, Bilnet, İstanbul, 2013.
3. Bayer H., Preface in Ed. Carboni, E. Exhibitions and Displays, Silvana, Milano, 1957.
4. Velarde G., Designing Exhibitions, Museums, Heritage, Trade and World Fairs, Ashgate, England, 2001.
5. Bogle E., Museum Exhibition Planning and Design, AltaMira Press, 2010.
6. Kossmann H., de Jong M., Engaging Spaces, Exhibition Design Explored. Frame Publishers, Amsterdam, 2010.
7. Hughes P., Exhibition Design: an Introduction Second Edition : An Introduction, Laurence King Publishing, 2015.
8. Storr R., Show and Tell. In Eds. Marincola, P. What Makes a Great Exhibition. Philedelphia Exhibitions Inintiative, PA., 14-31, 2006.
9. Van der Voordt D.J.M., and Van Wegen H.B.R., Architecture in Use: An Introduction to the Programming, Design and Evaluation of Buildings, Routledge, 2007.
10. Rapoport A., Kültür Mimarlık Tasarım, YEM, Istanbul, 2004.
11. Peponis J., Evaluation and Formulation in Design: The Implications of Morphological Theories of Function, Nordisk Arkitekturforskning 53-62, 1993:2.
12. Güler K., An Exhibition Design Checklist For Visitor Circulation, Museum Management and Curatorship, 30 (1), 63-74, 2015.
13. Wahab MHA and Zuhardi AFA, Human Visual Quality: Art Gallery Exhibition, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 101 (2013) 476 – 487, 2013.
14. Tzortzi K., Building and Exhibition Layout: Sainsbury Wing Compared With Castelvecchi, Design, 8 (2) 128- 140, 2004.
15. Krukar J., Look, Remember: The Influence of the Gallery’s Spatial Layout on Human Memory for an Art Exhibition, Behavioral Sciences, 4, 181–201, 2014.
16. Chunghung L., Mapping the Design Criterion Framework for Museum Exhibition Design Project. In: Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 1-16, 2009.
17. Carboni E., Exhibitions and Displays, Silvana, Milano, 1957.
18. Chan C., Measures of an Exhibition: Space, not Art, Is the Curator’s Primary Material, Fillip, Issue 13, 93-112, 2011.
19. Jin X., Weber K., Bauer T., Dimensions And Perceptional Differences Of Exhibition Destination Attractiveness: The Case Of China, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 37 (4), 447-469, 2013.
20. Lake-Hammond A., Waite N., Exhibition Design: Bridging the Knowledge Gap, The Design Journal, 13 (1), 77-98, 2015.
21. Jae Lee M., Lee S., Joo S., The Effects of Exhibition Service Quality on Exhibitor Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 24, 683–707, 2015.
22. Texen G., Participatory Design in Museums; VisitorOriented Perspectives on Exhibition Design. Stockholms University, 2005.
23. Alderoqui Pinus D., Look Again! Planning an Exhibition with Social Interaction in Mind, Journal of Museum Education, 25 (1-2), 21-24, 2015.
24. Mathes I., Pateli A., Tsamakos A., Spinellis D., Context Aware Services in Exhibition Environment- The mEXPRESS approach. Athens University of Economics and Business, Mobile/Wireless Research Group Publications Series, 2002.
25. Purkis H., Making Contact in An Exhibition Zone: Displaying Contemporary Cultural Diversity in Donegal, Ireland, Through An Installation Of Visual And Material Portraits, Museum and Society, 11 (1), 50- 67, 2013.
26. Macdonald S., Interconnecting: Museum Visiting and Exhibition Design. Codesign, Taylor & Francis, 3:S1, 149-16, 2007.
27. Barry M., Please Do Touch: Discourses on Aesthetic Interactivity in the exhibition Space. Participations, Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 11-1, 216- 236, 2014.
28. Peponis J., Dalton R.C., Wineman J., SheepDalton J., Path, Theme And Narrative in Open Plan Exhibition Setting, Proceedings, 4th International Space Syntax Symposium London, 2003.
29. Choi, H., The Conjugation Method of Augmented Reality in Museum Exhibition, International Journal of Smart Home, 8 (1), 217-228, 2014.
30. Ayu Wulandari, A.A., Sari Fajarwati, A.A., Latif, F., The Relationship of Exhibition Space Design and The Success of Delivering Messages to Museum Visitors in Jakarta, Humaniora, 8 (3), 219-228, 2017.
31. Maure M., The Exhibition As Theatre - On The Staging Of Museum Objects, Nordisk Museologi, 2, 155- 168, 1995.
32. Back M.,, Gold R., Balsamo A., Chow M., Gorbet M., Harrison S., MacDonald D., Minneman S., Designing Innovative Reading Experiences for a Museum Exhibition, Computer, 80-87, January 2001.
33. Melber L.M., Maternal Scaffolding in Two Museum Exhibition Halls, Curator, 50 (3), 341-354, 2007.
34. Driver F., Hidden Histories Made Visible? Reflections on a Geographical Exhibition, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38, 420–435, 2013.