Mimarlık tasarımı paradigmasında biomimesis'in etkisi

“Biomimesis”, canlı cansız varlıkların taklit edilerek yeni tasarımlara esin kaynağı olması kavramı 20.yüzyılın sonunda literatüre girmiş, doğadan esinlenme/öğrenme/uyarlama ve/veya uygulama biçimlerinin neler olabileceği ve farklı bilgi/teknoloji alanlarında nasıl kullanılabileceği sistematik olarak tartışılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada tarih boyunca pek çok alanda izlediğimiz doğa-insan etkileşiminin mimarlıktaki yansıma biçimleri binaların ait oldukları çağa göre öne çıkmışlıkları göz önünde bulundurularak örneklendirilmiş ve doğadan esinlenme süreci tartışılmıştır. Günümüzde hızla gelişmekte olan sayısal ve bilişim teknolojileri ile birlikte “mimarın” doğadaki oluşum süreçlerinden, biçimsel/görsel esinlenmenin ötesinde öğrenebilecekleri konusunda yeni bir tartışma ortamı yaratılması amaçlanmıştır.

Impact of biomimesis in architectural design paradigm

“Biomimesis”, imitation of animate and inanimate forms in nature to inspire new designs, is a term introduced at the end of 20th century, since then the way of inspiring/learning/adapting and/or implementing processes from nature and conception of how to be employed in different information/technology fields has been discussed systematically. In this study, some benchmark examples of human-nature interactions in architecture are introduced in a chronological order and their inspiration processes from nature are discussed. Moreover, it is aimed to initiate a platform in architecture which will serve for discussions to explore the potentials of these interactions under the impact of computational and information technologies, not only in terms of formal/visual way, but also extending to learn more about the formation process in nature.

PDF

___

1.Vitruvius,P., De Architectura On architecture. Books VI-X, Çeviren: Frank Granger, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,1934.
2. Arslan Selçuk, S., Gönenç Sorguç, A., “Similarities in Structures in Nature and Man- Made Structures : Biomimesis in Architecture”,2nd International Design and Nature Conference Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, Rodos, 45-54,28-30 Haziran 2004.
3. Mainstone, R., Structure in Architecture :History, Design, and Innovation, Aldershot, Hampshire, 1999.
4. Portoghesi, P., Nature and Architecture, Skira Editore, Milan, 2000.
5. Hersey, G., The Monumental Impulse: Architecture's Biological Roots, MIT Press,Cambridge, 1999.
6. Masso, J, Gaudi, The Man and His Work, Little, Brown and Company, 1999.
7. http://www.gaudiclub.com/esp/e_partici/mariana /0Spain-Barcelone-Gaudi-ston.jpg (en son erişim tarihi, Ekim2005)
8. Tsui, E., “Evolutionary Architecture: Nature as a Basis for Design”, John Wiley & Son, Inc.1999.
9. Lampugnani V.M. Encyclopedia of 20th Century Architecture, Thames and Hudson Ltd., London, 1989.
10. Frampton, K. Modern Architecture-A Critical History, Thames and Hudson Ltd, London, 1996.
11. Gössel, P. & G. Leuthauser. Architecture in the Twentieth Century. Benedikt Taschen. 1991.
12. Levine, N. The architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1996.
13. Melaragno, M., An Introduction to Shell Structures, and the Science of Vaulting, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991.
14. Jirapong, K. Discovering Architecture within a Seashell Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, The Graduate College of the Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois. 2002.
15. Fuller, B. Utopia or oblivion: the prospects for humanity Overlook Pres, New York, 1969.
16. http://mimarlikvesanattarihi.blogspot.com/2005/12/r.htmlcc (en son erişim tarihi, Ekim2006)
17. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laur eates/1996/press.html(en son erişim tarihi,Ekim 2006)
18. http://www.eyedesignbook.com (en son erişim tarihi, Ekim2006)
19. http://www.morphographic.com/Sphere/Hi_Rez/RadiolarianSphere_hirez.jpg (en son erişim tarihi, Ekim2006)
20. http://www.sixtiescity.com/Events/Images/EVE0 14.jpg (en son erişim tarihi, Ekim2006)
21. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frei_Otto (en son erişim tarihi, Mayıs2006)
22. Otto, F., Finding Form Towards an Architecture of the Minimal”, Deutscher Werkbund, Bayern. 1995.
23. IL 17 The work of Frei Otto and His Teams1955-1976. Stuttgart: lnstitut fur Leichte Flachentragwerke,1977.
24. IL 32 Lightweight Structures In Architecture And Nature. Stuttgart: lnstitut fur Leichte Flachentragwerke, 1979.
25. Drew, P. Frei Otto-Form Structure. Stuttgart:Verlag Gerd Hatje, 1976.
26. Roland, C. Frei Otto Tension Structure, New York, Praeger Publisher, 1970.
27. Tzonis, A., Santiago Calatrava Complete Works, Rizzoli, New York, 2004.
28. Boyut Çağdaş Dünya Mimarları Dizisi, Santiago Calatrava, Boyut Yayın Grubu, İstanbul, 2000.
29. Zardini, M. Santiago Calatrava Secret Sketchbook, New York, Monacelli Press. 1996.
30. Tzonis, A. Santiago Calatrava, The poetics of Movement. New York, Universe Publishing, 1999.
31. Williams, H.A., Zoomorphic - New Animal Architecture, Laurence King Publishing Ltd.2003.
32. Jodidio, P & S. Calatrava., Santiago Calatrava,TASCHEN America LIc, 1998.
33. Gönenç Sorguç, A. ve S. Arslan Selçuk , “Yapay Zeka Araştırmaları ve Biomimesis Kavramlarının Günümüzde Mimarlık Alanındaki Uygulamaları: Akıllı Mekanlar”. 4.Yapı ve Kentte Bilişim Kongresi 8-9 Haziran 2006 Ankara
34. Jencks, C., Architecture 2000: Predictions and Methods, International Thomson Publishing, London, 1971.
35. Baldwin, J., BuckyWorks: Buckminster Fuller's Ideas for Today, John Wiley & Sons,Inc, New York, 1996.
36. Beukers, A., Lightness. The Inevitable Renaissance of Minimum Energy Structures,010 Publishet, Rotterdam, 1999.
37. Frazer, J., An Evolutionary Architecture, Architectural Association, London, 1995.
38. Grimshaw, N., Structure, Space and Skin: The work of Nicholas Grimshaw and Partners,Phaidon, London, 1993.
39. Williams, H.A., Zoomorphic-New Animal Architecture, Laurence King Publishing Ltd,London, 2003.
40. Robbin T., Engineering a New Architecture, Yale University Press, London, 1996.
41. Kaplicky, J., Future Systems for Inspiration Only, Academy Editions, London, 1996.
42. Arslan Selçuk, S. and Gönenc Sorguç, A,“Biomimesis in Architecture: Inspiration for Next Generation Po$circledR$table Buildings” Theory,Context, Design an Technology;Transportable Environments-3, Editor: Robert Kronenburg, Filiz Klassen, Taylor& Francis,NY, 2006.
43. Margolius, I, .Architects+ engineers = structures: a book that celebrates well-known designers, West Sussex : Wiley-Academy,2002.
44. Benyus, J., “Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature”. William Morrow Company Inc., NY. 1997.
45. Vincent, J., Stealing Ideas from Nature, www.bath.ac.uk/mecheng//biomimetics/ Biomimetics.pdf (en son erişim tarihi, Mayıs2006)
46. Abdala, A., Milius, D.L., Adamson, D.H., Aksay, I.A., “Inspired Abalone Shell:Strengthening of Porous Ceramics with Polymers”, http://www.princeton.edu/~cml/assets/pdf/pu_04_90abdala.pdf (en son erişim tarihi, Mayıs 2006)
47. Shear, W.A., J.M. Palmer, J.A. Coddington, and P.M. Bonamo., “A devonian spinneret: early evidence of spiders and silk use”. Science, 246, 479-481. 1989
48. Vincent, J., “Tricks of Nature”, New Scientist,151, 40-48, 1996.
49. Koelman, O.,“Biomimetic Buildings Understanding & Applying the Lessons of Nature”,http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/art1048.php(en son erişim tarihi, Haziran2003)
50. http://www.ellipsis.com/evolutionary/#s0.1(en son erişim tarihi, Ekim2003)
51. Lynn, G. Animate form, New York : Princeton Architectural Press, 1999.
52. Spuybroek, L. NOX: Machining Architecture Thames & Hudson , 2004.
53. Gönenç Sorguç A., ‘The Evolving Role of Mathematics in Designing in Digital Medium’, Nexus Conference June 2006.
54. Arslan Selcuk, S “Mathematics as a Tool to Evaluate Biomimetic Inspirations: a Study on Seashell Modeling” Poster presented and published in the Proceedings of the 1st International CIB Endorsed METU Postgraduate Conference on Built Environment and Information Technologies METU-Ankara, Turkiye March 16-18 2006.
55. http://www.unica.edu/estudi.uic?cdi_opc=1499 (en son erişim tarihi, Ekim2003)
56. http://www.tumbletruss.com/index.html (en son erişim tarihi, Ekim2003)