Kablosuz ağlarda sezgisel bir yönlendirme protokolü ve tıkanıklık denetimi

Bu çalışmada, kablosuz ağlar için bir sezgisel yönlendirme protokolü geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen protokol, tıkanıklık oluşmadan önce yük dağılımını yeniden düzenleyerek tıkanıklığı önlemektedir. Geliştirilen protokol ns-2 (network simulator 2) benzetim aracı kullanılarak test edilmiş ve test sonuçları kablosuz ağlarda yaygın olarak kullanılan Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Protokolü ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Elde edilen deneysel sonuçlar geliştirilen protokolün kablosuz ağlarda tıkanıklık denetiminde başarılı olduğunu göstermiştir.

A heuristic routing protocol and congestion control at wireless networks

In this study, a heuristic routing protocol has been developed for wireless networks. Developed protocol prevents congestion by compensating load balance before congestion occurs. The protocol has been tested using ns-2 (network simulator 2) simulation tool and experimental results have been compared with Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) protocol used commonly in wireless networks. Obtained results showed that the developed protocol is succesful for congestion prevention in wireless networks.

PDF

___

1. Jacobson V., “Congestion Avoidance and Control”, SIGCOMM '88, 314-320, Stanford, ABD, 1988.
2. Stevens W.R., “TCP Slow-Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmission, and Fast Recovery Algorithms”, IETF RFC 2001, Virginia, 1997.
3. Keshav S., “Congestion Control in Computer Networks”, PhD Thesis, Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Electrical-Electronics and Computer Science, 1991.
4. Welzl M., “Network Congestion Control, Managing Internet Traffic”, Wiley, New Jersey, ABD, 2005.
5. Perkins C. and Bhagwat P., “Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers”, ACM SIGCOMM'94, 234-244, London, England, 1994.
6. Johnson D. and Maltz D., “Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks”, Mobile Computing, 353(5), 153-181, 1996.
7. Allman M., Paxson V. and Stevens W., “TCP Congestion Control”, IETF RFC 2581, Virginia, 1999.
8. Floyd S., “Congestion Control Principle”, IETF RFC 2914, Virginia, 2000.
9. Kim D., Toh C., and Choi Y., “TCP-BuS: Improving TCP Performance in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks”, Journal of Communications and Networks, 3(2), 175-186, 2001.
10. Chandran K., Raghunathan S., Venkatesan S., and Prakash R., “A Feedback-Based Scheme for Improving TCP Performans in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks”, IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 8(1), 2001.
11. Haas Z.J., “A New Routing Protocol for the Reconfigurable Wireless Networks”, IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communication (ICUPC), 562-566, San Diego, ABD, 1997.
12. Stallings W., “Wireless Communications and Networks”, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, ABD, 2004.
13. Kurose J.F., “Computer Networking: A Top- Down Approach Featuring the Internet”, Addison Wesley, Boston, ABD, 2004.
14. Basagni S., Conti M., Giordano S., Stojmenovi I., “Mobile Ad Hoc Networking”, Wiley-IEEE Press, New Jersey, ABD, 2004.
15. Holland G. and Vaidya N.H., “Analysis of TCP Performance Over Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, ACM/ IEEE MOBICOM, 219-230, Seattle, ABD, 1999.
16. Aggelou G., “Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: From Wireless LANs to 4G Networks”, McGraw Hill, New York, ABD, 2004.
17. Perkins C.E., Elizabeth M.B.R., and Das S., “Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, IETF RFC 3561, Virginia, 2003.
18. Murthy C.S.R, Manoj B.S., “Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks-Architectures and Protocols”, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, ABD, 2004.
19. Santi P., “Topology Control in Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks”, Wiley, New Jersey, ABD, 2005.