___

• Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. and Marek, E.A. (1992). “Understanding and Misunderstandings of Eighth Graders of Five Chemistry Concepts Found in Textbooks”, Journel of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105-120.
• Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M. and Westbrook, S.L., (1994) “A cross-age study of understanding of five chemistry concepts”, J. Res. In Sci. Teach., 31: 147- 165.
• Atasoy, B. (2004). “Fen Öğrenimi ve Öğretimi”, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 23-24 64-69.
• Aubusson, P., Fogwill, S., Barr, R. and Perkovic, L., (1997) “What happens when students do simulation-role-play in Science?”, Research in Science Education, 27 (5): 565-580.
• Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B and Silberstein, J., (1988) “Students’ visualization of a chemical reaction”, Education in Chemistry, 117-120.
• Ben-Zwi, R., Eylon, B. ve Silberstein, J., (1986) “Is an Atom of copper Malleable?”, J. Chem. Educ., 63: 64-66.
• Black, M., (1979) “Can pupils use taught analogies for electric current?”, School science review, 69: 249-254.
• Burton, L.D., (1997) “Hitting the issues head on: using role play in science education”, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national science teachers association, New Orleans, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 411 162),.
• Chesler, M. and Fox, R. (1966) “Role-Playing Methods in the Classroom”, Science Research Associates, Chicago,.
• Davidson, R.D., (1976) “The role of metaphor and analogy in learning”, Cognitive Learning in Children: Theories and Strategies, Levin, J.R. and Allen, V.L., Academic Press, New York, 135-162.
• Del Pozo, R.M. (2001). “Prospective Teachers’ Ideas About The Relationships Between Concepts Describing The Composition of Matter”, International Journel of Research in Science Education, 23 (4), 353-371.
• Dreistadt, R., (1969) “The use of analogies and incubation in obtaining insight in creative problem solving”, The journal of psychology, 71: 159-175.
• Duit, R., (1991) “On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science”, Science Education, 75 (6): 649-672.
• Ebenezer, J.V. and Erickson, G.L., (1996) “Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: a phenomenography”, Science Education, 80 (2): 181-201.
• Ebenezer, J.V., (2001) “A hypermedia environment to explore and negotiate students’ conceptions: animation of the solution Process of table salt”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10 (1): 73-92.
• Farin, S., (1997) “Acting atoms”, Science Scope, 21 (3): 46-48.
• Gabel, D.L. (1993). “Use of The Particle Nature of Matter in Developing Conceptual Understanding”, Journal of Chemical Education, 70 (3), 193-194.
• Gabel, D.L., (1998) “The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching”, International Handbook of Science Education, 1, Fraser, B.J. and Tobin K., Kluwer Academic Publisher, Great Britain, 233-248.
• Gabel, D.L., Samuel, K.V. and Hunn, D. (1987) “Understanding the particulate nature of matter”, J. Chem. Edu., 64: 695-697.
• Griffiths, A.K. and Preston, K.R. (1992). “Grade-12 Students’Misconceptions Relating to Fundamentel Charecteristics of Atoms and Molecules”, Journel of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6), 611-628.
• Hackling, M. W. and Garnett, P. J., (1986) “Chemical Equilibrium: Learning Difficulties and teaching strategies”, The Australian Science Teacher Journal, 31 (4): 8-13.
• Harrison, A.G. and Treagust, D.F. (1996). “Secondary Students’ Mental Models of Atoms and Molecules: Implications for Teaching Chemistry”, Science Education, 80 (5), 509-534.
• Joyce, B., and Weil, M., (1992) “Models of Teaching”, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 89- 108.
• Kadayıfçı, H. (2001). “Lise-3 Sınıftaki Öğrencilerin Kimyasal Bağlar Konusundaki Yanlış Kavramların Belirlenmesi ve Yapılandırıcı Yaklaşımın Yanlış Kavramaların Giderilmesi Üzerine Etkisi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
• Lawson, A.E., (1993) “The importance of analogy: a prelude to the special issue”, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 30 (10): 1213-1214.
• McSharry, G. and Jones, S., (2000) “Role-play in science teaching and learning”, School Science Review, 82 (298): 73-81.
• Nakhleh, M.B. and Samarapungavan, A. (1999). “Elementary School Chilrens’ Beliefs Abut Matter”, Journel of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (7), 777-805.
• Paivio, A., “The mind’s eye in arts and science”, Poetics, 12 (1): 1-18. (1983).
• Renström, L., Anderson, B., and Marton, F. (1990). “Students’ conception of matter”, Journel of Chemical Psychology, 82 (3): 555-559.
• Resnick, M. and Wilensky, U., (1998) “Diving into complexity: developing probabilistic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities”, Journal of Learning Science, 7(2): 153-175.
• Royer, J.M., and Cable, G.W., (1976) “Illustrations, analogies and facilitative transfer in prose learning”, The journal of psychology, 68: 205-209.
• Shapiro, M. A., (1985) “Analogies, visualization and mental processing of science stories” Paper presented to the Information Systems Division of the International Communication Association, Honolulu,.
• Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L. and McCharty, S., (1992) “Teaching about the nature of science trough history: Action research in the classroom”, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 29: 409-421.
• Taylor, C.A., (1987) “Science Education and Information Transfer”, Pergamon, Oxford,.
• Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Lindaurer, I. and Joslin, P., (1992) “Science teachers’ use of analogies: observations from classroom practice”, International Journal of Science Education, 14: 413-422.
• Treagust, D., Duit, R. and Nieswandt, M., (2000) “Sources of students’ difficultiesin learning chemistry”, Educación Química, 11 (2): 228-235.
• Tsai, C.C. (2001). “Probing Students’ Cognitive Structures in Science: The Use of a Flow Map Method Coupled With a Meta-Listeining Technique”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 257-268.
• Ünal, R. ve Zollman, D. (1997). “Students’ Description of an Atom: A Phenomenographic Analysis”, Department of Physics Kansas State University.
• Van Ments, (1999) “The Effective Use of Role-Play: Practical Techniques for Improving Learning, 2nd Ed”, Kogan Page, London,.
• Webb, M. J., (1985) “Analogies and their limitations”, School Science and Mathematics, 85: 645-650.
• Weller, C. M., (1970) “The role of analogy in teaching science”, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 7: 113-119.
• Yeğnidemir, D. (2000). “Temel eğitim 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Madde ve Maddenin Tanecikli-Boşluklu-Hareketli Yapısı ile ilgili Yanlış Kavramaların Tespiti ve Giderilmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.