Adrienne Rich'in "Diving into the Wreck" Adlı Şiirine Eko Feminist Bir Yaklaşım

Bu çalışmada Adrienne Rich\'in şiirlerinden olan “Diving into the Wreck” (1973) adlı şiiri eko feminist eleştiri bağlamında incelenmektedir. Rich\'in doğa şiirleri, kadın tarafsızlığını ve bilincini, ata erkil suistimalini ve önem vermeme varsayımlarını sorgular. Şiirdeki androjen (çift cinsiyetli) karakter “ben” ile birlikte Rich, dişi öznelliğine yer verebilmek için toplumsal cinsiyet ve cinsiyet sınırlarının ötesine gider. Şiirdeki karakter dişi kimliğini ve cinselliğini mecazi bir şekilde deniz altı batığına “dalarak” ve deniz altı hayatını keşfederek ifade etmeye başlar. Kişi doğaya kaçar; çünkü hem doğa hem de kadınlar tahrip edici kuvvetler tarafından sömürülmektedir.

An Ecofeminist Approach to Adrienne Rich's Poem "Diving into the Wreck" Adrienne

This study examines Adrienne Rich\'s poem “Diving into the Wreck” (1973) through ecofeminist criticism. Rich\'s ecopoetry questions assumptions about feminine subjectivity and female consciousness, patriarchal abuse, and indifference regarding women. With the androgynous persona in the poem “I”, Rich moves beyond the limits of gender and sexes to give room to form female subjectivity. Persona in the poem starts to explore and express her feminine identity and sexuality by figuratively “diving” into a wreck and exploring an underwater world. The persona escapes to nature, because both nature and women are exploited by dominant destructive forces.

___

  • Annas, P. (1982). A Poetry of Survival: Unnaming and Renaming in the Poetry of Audre Lorde, Pat Parker, Sylvia Plath, and Adrienne Rich. Colby Quarterly 18(1), 9-25.
  • Armbruster, K. (2000). Feminism and Ecology (review), NWSA Journal 12(1) (Spring), 210-216.
  • Birkeland, J. (1995). Disgendering Ecofeminism. The Trumpeter 12(4), 178-180.
  • Buckingham, S. (2004). Ecofeminism in the 21st Century. The Geographical Journal 170(2), 146-154.
  • Buell, L. (2005). The Future of the Environment: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Eaton, H. (2005). Introducting Ecofeminist Theologies. M. Grey, L. Isherwood, J. Wooton (eds.) London: J. J. Clark International.
  • Heilbrun, C. G. (1973). Toward a Recognition of Androgyny. New York: Norton.
  • Jeffs, W. P. (2003). Feminism, Manhood, and Homosexuality: Intersections in Psychoanalysis and American Poetry. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
  • Jones, W. (et. al). (1978). The Enigma of Androgyny: Differential Implications for Males and Females. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46 (2), 298-313.
  • McCorkle, J. (1989). Still Performance: Writing, Self, and Interconnection in Five Postmodern American Poets. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia.
  • Mellor, M. (1997). Introduction. Feminism and Ecology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1-13.
  • Mohammadi, N. (2007). Transformational Subjectivity: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of ‘Identity,’ ‘Gender,’ and ‘Nature’ in Adrienne Rich’s Poetry. Diss. (PhD) Universität Augsburg, Ausburg.
  • Oppermann, S. (2011). The Future of Ecocriticism: Present Currents. The Future of Ecocriticism: New Horizons. S. Oppermann (et.al). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 14- 29.
  • Rich, A. (1973). Diving into the Wreck: Poems 1971-1972. New York: W. W Norton & Company, Inc.
  • ___ (1979). When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision. On Lies, Secrets, and Silence. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22.
  • Richmond-Abbott, M. (1992). Masculine and Feminine: Gender Roles over the Life Cycle. 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sturgeon, N. (1997). Ecofeminist Natures: Race, Gender, Feminist Theory and Political Action. New York: Routledge.
  • Taylor, M. C. and J. A. Hall. (1982). Psychological Androgyny: Theories, Methods and Conclusions. Psychological Bulletin 92(2), 347-366.
  • Vanderbosch, J. (1984). Beginning Again. Reading Adrienne Rich: Review and Re- Visions, 1951-81. J. R. Cooper (Ed) Michigan: U of Michigan P. 111-139.