___

• [1] Cross, N., Developments in Design Methodology, Chichester:Wiley, 1984.
• [2] Pahl., G. ve Beitz, W., Konstruktionslehre, 1st ed., Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1977.
• [3] Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. ve Grote, K.H., Engineering Design – A Systematic Approach, Translated and Edited by Wallace, K., Blessing, L.,3 rd ed., London: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
• [4] Kurtoglu, T., Tumer, I. ve Jensen, D., “A functional failure reasoning methodology for evaluation of conceptual system architectures”, Research in Engineering Design, Cilt 21, No 4, 209-234, 2010.
• [5] Li, W., Li, Y., Wang, J. ve Liu, X., “The process model to aid innovation of products conceptual design”, Expert Systems with Applications, Cilt 37, No 5, 3574-3587, 2010.
• [6] Chong, Y., Chen, C.H. ve Leong, K., “A heuristicbased approach to conceptual design”, Research in Engineering Design, Cilt 20, No 2, 97-116, 2009.
• [7] He, B. ve Feng, P., “Research on collaborative conceptual design based on distributed knowledge resource”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Cilt 66, No 5-8, 645- 662, 2013.
• [8] Akao, Y., Quality Function Deployment, Productivity Press, Cambridge MA, 1990. [9] Altshuller, G., TRIZ keys to technical innovation, Worcester: Technical Innovation Center, Inc., 2005.
• [10] Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D. ve Phaal, R., “A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice”, Technovation, Cilt 33, No 2–3, 30-37, 2013.
• [11] Cavalucci, D., “How TRIZ can contribute to a paradigm change in R&D practices”, The Eighth TRIZ Symposium, Japan TRIZ Society, Tokyo, Japan, 1-54, 6-8 Eylül 2012.
• [12] Malmquist, J., Axelsson, R. ve Johansson M., “A Comparative Analysis of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving and the Systematic Approach of Pahl and Beitz”, In: ASME - DETC, Irvine, Proceedings of The DSTC, 1-11, 1996.
• [13] De Carvalho, M.A. ve Back, N., “CrossFertilization between TRIZ and the Systematic Approach to Product Planning and Conceptual Design”, TRIZ-CON2000 Proceedings, Worcester/MA, USA,1-12, 2000.
• [14] Dietz, T.P. ve Mistree, F., “Integrated Pahl and Beitz and the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving for the Conceptual Design of MultiDomain Systems”, ASME Conf. Proc., USA, 189- 203, 2009.
• [15] Tan, R., Ma, J., Liu, F. ve Wei, Z., “UXDs-driven conceptual design process model for contradiction solving using CAIs”, Computers in Industry, Cilt 60, No 8, 584-591, 2009.
• [16] Song, M.J., Lee, J.G., Park, J.M. ve Lee, S., “Triggering navigators for innovative system design: The case of lab-on-a-chip technology”, Expert Systems with Applications, Cilt 39, No 16, 12451-12459, 2012.
• [17] Yamashina, H., Ito, T. ve Kawada, H., “Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ”, International Journal of Production Research, Cilt 40, No 5, 1031-1050, 2002.
• [18] Li, Y., Wang, J., Li, X. ve Zhao, W., “Design creativity in product innovation”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Cilt 33, No 3-4, 213-222, 2007.
• [19] Xie, J., Tang, X. ve Shao, Y., “Research on Product Conceptual Design Based on Integrated of TRIZ and HOQ”, In: Tan R, Cao G, León N (eds) Growth and Development of ComputerAided Innovation, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Cilt 304, 203-209, 2009.
• [20] Chaoqun, D., “Research on Application System of Integrating QFD and TRIZ”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovation and Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Cilt I ve II, 499-503, 04-05 Aralık, 2010.
• [21] Hirtz, J., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., Szykman, S. ve Wood, K.L., “A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts”, Research in Engineering Design, Cilt 13, No 2, 65-82, 2002.