Neşe KARABACAK, Özlem COŞKUN, Işıl İrem BUDAKOĞLU, Onur KARABACAK

Personality and learning styles of final-year medical students and the İmpact of these variables on medical specialty choices

Amaç: Günümüzde kampüslerdeki tıp öğrencilerinin profili değişmektedir ve kişilik tiplerinde ve öğrenme stili tercihlerindeki varyasyonlar dikkate alınmalıdır. Bu çalışmada Gazi Üniversitesi tıp öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerini ve öğrencilerin kişilik tipleri, öğrenme stilleri ve tıpta uzmanlık tercihleri arasında herhangi bir ilişki olup olmadığını belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Çalışma 2011-2012 akademik yılında Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesinde 170 (%96.6) son sınıf öğrencisi ile yapılmıştır. Yazarlar kişilik özelliklerini belirlemek için Myers-Briggs Kişilik Ölçeği (MBKÖ) ve öğrenme stililini ortaya çıkarmak için Grasha Riechmann Öğrenci Öğrenme Stili Ölçeği (GRÖÖSÖ) kullanmışlardır. Bulgular: Araştırma sırasında yakın gelecekte öğrencilerin %91.8i uzman ve %4.1i genel pratisyen olmak istediklerini açıklamışlardır. Tüm grupta en çok tercih edilen uzmanlık dermatoloji (%11.2) olarak gözükmektedir. Uzman olmak isteyen kız öğrencilerin tercihleri dermatoloji, oftalmoloji ve kadın doğumdur dağılımlar sırasıyla %22.8, %13.0 ve %9.8dir (p

Son sınıf tıp öğrencilerinin kişilik ve öğrenme stillerinin tıpta uzmanlık tercihi üzerine etkileri

Objective: Medical student profile is changing on campuses today and there is a much greater variation in the range of personality type and learning style preferences to be considered. In this study it is aimed to determine the learning styles of medical school students at Gazi University and to find out whether there is any relationship between students personality types, learning style preferences and their medical specialty choices. Methods: The study was conducted on 170 final year students (96.6%) at the Gazi University School of Medicine in the 2011-2012 academic year. The authors used Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to determine the personality traits and Grasha Riechmann Student Learning Style Scale (GRSLSS) to establish the learning styles. Results: During the study, 91.8% of the students declared that they wanted to be a specialist and 4.1% wanted to be a general practitioner in the near future. Most preferred specialty appeared to be dermatology (11.2%) in whole group. Choices of female students who want to be a specialist were dermatology, ophthalmology and obstetrics and gynecology and their distributions were 22.8%, 13.0% and 9.8%, respectively (p

PDF

___

1. Harden RM. Outcome-Based Education: the future is today. Med Teach 2007;29:625-9.
2. European Core Curriculum the Students Perspective, 5th International Follow-Up Conference on the Bologna Process in Medical Education, 6 - 10th July, 2006. Bristol (UK) (cited 2012 July 26), Available from URL: http://www.educmed.net/pdf/documentos/bolonia/eccsp.pdf.
3. Hojat M, Zuckerman M. Personality and specialty interest in medical students. Med Teach 2008;30:400-6.
4. Royston PJ, Mathieson K, Leafman J, Ojan-Sheehan O. Medical student characteristics predictive of intent for rural practice. Rural and Remote Health 2012;12:2107. (Online). Available from URL: http://www.rrh.org.au
5. Davis KR, Banken JA. Personality type and clinical evaluations in an obstetrics/gynecology medical student clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1807-10.
6. Bell MA, Wales PS, Torbeck LJ, Kunzer JM, Thurston VC, Brokaw JJ. Do personality differences between teachers and learners impact students' evaluations of a surgery clerkship? J Surg Educ 2011; 68: 190-3.
7. Sefcik DJ, Prerost FJ, Arbet SE. Personality Types and Performance on Aptitude and Achievement Tests: Implications for Osteopathic Medical Education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009;109:296-301.
8. Zardouz S, German MA, Wu EC, Djalilian HR. Personality types of otolaryngology resident applicants as described by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144:714-8.
9. Swanson JA, Antonoff MB, D'Cunha J, Maddaus MA. Personality profiling of the modern surgical trainee: insights into generation X. J Surg Educ 2010; 67: 417-20.
10. Clack GB, Allen J, Cooper D, Head JO. Personality differences between doctors and their patients: implications for the teaching of communication skills. Med Educ 2004; 38: 177-86.
11. Nancy A. Stilwell, Mollie M. Wallick, Sara E. Thal & Joseph A. Burleson. Myers-Briggs Type and Medical Specialty Choice: A New Look at an Old Question. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2000; 12:14-20.
12. Myers Briggs Personality Type Indicator. (cited 2012 August 02), Available from URL: http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti- basics/.
13. Grasha A.F. Teaching with Style A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. San Bernardino: Alliance Publishers; 2002.
14. Riding R., Rayner S, editors. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. London: David Fulton Publishers; 1998.
15. Tuzcuoğlu AS. Translation, Reliability and Validity Study of Myers Briggs Type Indicator. PhD Thesis, Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, 1996.
16. Süral S. The Relationship Between Learning Styles and Academic Achievements of Primary Candidate Teachers in Science and Technology Teaching Lesson. M. Sc. Thesis, Pamukkale University Institute of Social Sciences, Denizli, 2008.
17. Budakoglu I, Erdemli E, Babadogan C. Learning styles of term 1 medical students in Turkish and English departments of medical faculty. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012; 46: 3271-4.
18. Quenk NL. Essentials of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® Assessment. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2009.