___

• [1] Košir, M., Iglič, N., Kunič, R.: Optimisation of heating, cooling and lighting energy performance of modular buildings in respect to location’s climatic specifics. Renew Energy 2018; 129: 527–539.[2] Abo-Elyousr, F.K., Elnozahy, A.: Bi-objective economic feasibility of hybrid micro-grid systems with multiple fuel options for islanded areas in Egypt. Renew Energy 2018; 128: 37–56.[3] Gu, Q., Wei, J., Luo, S., Ma, M., Tang, X.: Potential and environmental control of carbon sequestration in major ecosystems across arid and semi-arid regions in China. Sci Total Environ 2018; 645: 796–805.[4] Nabielek, P., Dumke, H., Weninger, K.: Balanced renewable energy scenarios: a method for making spatial decisions despite insufficient data, illustrated by a case study of the Vorderland-Feldkirch Region, Vorarlberg, Austria. Energy Sustain Soc.8, 2018.[5] Üçtuğ, F.G., Azapagic, A.: Environmental impacts of small-scale hybrid energy systems: Coupling solar photovoltaics and lithium-ion batteries. Sci Total Environ 2018; 643: 1579–1589.[6] Leng, G.: Keeping global warming within 1.5 °C reduces future risk of yield loss in the United States: A probabilistic modeling approach. Sci Total Environ 2018; 644: 52–59.[7] Talbot, D., Boiral, O.: GHG reporting and impression management: An assessment of sustainability reports from the energy sector. J Bus Ethics 2018; 147: 367–383.[8] Karunathilake, H., Hewage, K., Mérida, W., Sadiq, R.: Renewable energy selection for net-zero energy communities: Life cycle based decision making under uncertainty. Renew Energy 2019; 130: 558–573.[9] Ediger, V.Ş., Kirkil, G., Çelebi, E., Ucal, M., Kentmen-Çin, Ç.: Turkish public preferences for energy. Energy Policy 2018; 120: 492–502.[10] Liobikienė, G., Butkus, M.: The challenges and opportunities of climate change policy under different stages of economic development. Sci Total Environ 2018; 642: 999–1007.[11] Kılıç, E., Puig, R., Zengin, G., Zengin, C.A., Fullana-i-Palmer, P.: Corporate carbon footprint for country Climate Change mitigation: A case study of a tannery in Turkey. Sci Total Environ 2018; 635: 60–69.[12] Ozdemir, S., Sahin, G.: Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP. Meas J Int Meas Confed 2018; 129: 218–226.[13] Pasaoglu, G., Garcia, N.P., Zubi, G.: A multi-criteria and multi-expert decision aid approach to evaluate the future Turkish power plant portfolio. Energy Policy 2018; 119: 654–665.[14] Sak, T.: Rüzgâr ve güneş enerjisi teknolojilerinin irdelenmesi ve Niğde iline uygulanabilirliklerinin değerlendirilmesi, Yüksek lisans, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi, Niğde, Turkiye, 2015.[15] Koval, S., Krahenbuhl, G., Warren, K., O’Brien, G.: Optical microscopy as a new approach for characterising dust particulates in urban environment. J Environ Manage 2018; 223: 196–202.[16] Yang, H.-H., Arafath, S.M., Lee, K.-T., Hsieh, Y.-S., Han, Y.-T.: Chemical characteristics of filterable and condensable PM2.5 emissions from industrial boilers with five different fuels. Fuel 2018; 232. 415–422.[17] Gonzalez, A., Riba, J.-R., Esteban, B., Rius, A.: Environmental and cost optimal design of a biomass–Wind–PV electricity generation system. Renew Energy 2018; 126: 420–430.[18] Souliotis, M., Arnaoutakis, N., Panaras, G., Kavga, A., Papaefthimiou, S.: Experimental study and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T) solar systems for domestic applications. Renew Energy 2018; 126: 708–723.[19] Ramphull, M., Surroop, D.: Greenhouse gas emission factor for the energy sector in Mauritius. J Environ Chem Eng 2017; 5: 5994–6000.[20] WNA: Comparison of Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Electricity Generation Sources, 2011.