___

• Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. & Marek, E.A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eight graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105-120.
• Adadan, E. (2012). Using multiple representations to promote grade 11 students’ scientific understanding of the particle theory of matter. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1079-1105.
• Adadan, E. (2014). Investigating the influence of pre-service chemistry teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter on their conceptual understanding of solution chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 219-238.
• Akdeniz, A.R., Bektaş, U. & Yiğit, N. (2000). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin temel fizik kavramlarını anlama düzeyi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 5-14.
• Amin T.G., Carol. S. & Wiser. M. (2014). Student Conceptions and Conceptual Change: Three Overlapping Phases of Research. To appear in N. Lederman and S. Abell (Eds), Handbook of Research in Science Education, Vol. II. New York: Routledge
• Artdej, R., Ratanaroutai, T. & Coll, R.K. (2010). Thai grade 11 students' alternative conceptions for acid-base chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 167-183.
• Atwood, R.A. & Atwood, V.A. (1996). Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of the causes of seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 553-563.
• Ayas, A., Özmen, H. & Çalık, M. (2010). Students' conceptions of the particulate nature of matter at secondary and tertiary level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 165-184.
• Banawi, A., Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A. & Solehuddin, M. (2019). Prospective primary school teachers’ conception change on states of matter and their changes through Predict- Observe-Explain Strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 359-374.
• Barker V. (1995). A longitudinal study of 16–18-year old’s’ understanding of basic chemical ideas. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Educational Studies, University of York.
• Bendal, S., Goldberg, F. & Galili, I. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ prior knowledge about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1169-1187.
• Benson, D.L., Wittrock, C.M. & Baur, M.E. (1993). Students’ preconceptions of the nature of gases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(6), 587-597.
• Blanco, A. & Prieto, T. (1997). Pupils’ views on how stirring and temperature affect the dissolution of a solid in a liquid: A cross-age study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 303-315.
• Bodner, M.B. (1991). The conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(5), 385-388.
• Boz, Y. (2006). Turkish pupils' conceptions of the participate nature of matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 203-213.
• Coştu, B., Ayas, A., Açıkkar, E. & Çalık, M. (2007). Çözünürlük konusu ile ilgili kavramlar ne düzeyde anlaşılıyor? Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 13-28.
• Çakmak, M., Çakmak, R. & Topal, G. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının su hakkındaki bilgi düzeyleri ve kavram yanılgıları. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(27), 385-404.
• Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of eighth‐grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638-667.
• Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Ünal, S. (2006). Çözünme kavramıyla ilgili öğrenci kavramalarının tespiti: bir yaşlar arası karşılaştırma çalışması. Gazi Üniversitesi Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(3), 309-322.
• Dori, Y.J. & Hameiri, M. (2003). Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems—Symbol, macro, micro and process aspects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 278-302.
• Driver, R. & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science. Journal Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 37-60.
• Driver, R. & Easley. J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
• Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into Children’s Ideas (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge.
• Ebenezer, J.V. & Erickson, G.L. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: A phenomenograpy. Science Education, 80, 181-201.
• Gabel, D.L., Hunn, D. & Samuel, K.V. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695-697.
• Garnett, P.J, Garnett, P.J. & Hackling, M.W. (1995). students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Journal Studies in Science Education, 25(1), 69-95.
• Gilbert, J. K. & Zyberstajn, A. (1985). A conceptual framework for science education: The case study of force and movement. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 107-120.
• Goodwin, A. (2002). Is salt melting when it dissolves in water? Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 393-396.
• Griffiths, A.K. & Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628.
• Güneş, T., Taştan Akdağ, F. & Güneş, O. (2016). Lise öğrencilerinin sıvıların kaldırma kuvvetinin öğrenilmesine yönelik hazır bulunuşlukları ve kavram yanılgıları. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2 (1), 20-32.
• Haidar, A.H. (1997). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of the conservation of matter and related concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 181-197.
• Hançer, A.H., Şensoy, Ö. & Yıldırım, H.İ. (2003). İlköğretimde çağdaş fen bilgisi öğretiminin önemi ve nasıl olması gerektiği üzerine bir değerlendirme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 80-88.
• Hewson, M.G. & Hewson, P.W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731-743.
• Horton, C. (2007). Student alternative conceptions in chemistry. California Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 18-38.
• Jauhariyah, M.N.R., Suprapto, N., Suliyanah, S., Admoko, S., Setyarsih, W., Harizah, Z. & Zulfa, I. (2018). The students’ misconceptions profile on chapter gas kinetic theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1).
• Johnson, P. (1998). Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 1: Boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 567-583.
• Kang, S., Scharmann, L.C., Noh, T. & Koh, H. (2005). The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1037-1058.
• Karaaslan, E.H. & Ayas. A. (2016). Fen eğitiminde ‘bilimsel açıklama’ ve önemi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 101-120.
• Kartal, T., Öztürk, N. & Yalvaç, H.G. (2011). Misconceptions of science teacher candidates about heat and temperature. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2758–2763.
• Kesmez, İ. (2010). Fen Öğretimi Laboratuvar Uygulamaları-1. 2. Baskı, Erzurum.
• Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A. & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 120-137.
• Kind, V. (2004). Beyond Appearances: Students’ Misconceptions about Basic Chemical Ideas, 2nd Edition, School of Education, Durham University, UK.
• King, C.J.H. (2010). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 565-601.
• Kirbulut, Z.D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using three-tier diagnostic test to assess students’ misconceptions of states of matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(5), 509-521.
• Konur, K. & Ayas, A. (2004). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bazı kimya kavramlarını anlama seviyeleri. VI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitim Kongresi, 9–11 Eylül, İstanbul,
• Koray, Ö., Akyaz, N. & Köksal, M.S. (2007). Lise öğrencilerinin “çözünürlük” konusunda günlük yaşamla ilgili olaylarda gözlenen kavram yanılgıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 241-250.
• Kruger C.J. & Summers M.K. (1989). An investigation of some primary teachers’ understanding of change in materials. The School science review, 71(255), 17-27.
• Lee, O., Eichinger, D.C., Anderson, C.W., Berkeimer, G.D. & Blakeslee, T.D. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Chemical Education, 67, 248-252.
• Lemma, A. (2013). A diagnostic assessment of eighth grade students’ and their teachers’ misconceptions about basic chemical concepts. African Journal of Chemical Education, 3(1), 39-59.
• Lin, H-S., Cheng, H-J. & Lawrenz, F. (2000). The assessment of students and teachers’ understanding of gas laws. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 235-238.
• Marx R.W., Blumenfeld P.C., Krajcik J.S., Fishman B., Soloway E., Geier, R. & Tal. R.T. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063–1080.
• Mayer, K. (2011). Addressing students' misconceptions about gases, mass, and composition. Research: Science and Education, 88(1), 111-115.
• McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry. 7th Edition, My Education Lab Series, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
• Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (2nd Edition). California: SAGE Publications.
• Mirzalar–Kabapınar, F. & Adik, B. (2005). Ortaöğretim 11. sınıf öğrencilerinin fiziksel değişim ve kimyasal bağ ilişkisini anlama seviyesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 123-147.
• Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates’ bonding misconception. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 707-730.
• Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study. Science Education, 62, 273-281.
• Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross‐age study. Science Education, 65(2), 187-196.
• Osborne R. & Cosgrove M. (1983), Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825-838.
• Osborne, R., Bell, B. & Gilbert, J. (1983) Science teaching and children's views of the world. European Journal of Science Education, 5, 1-14.
• Özmen, H., Ayas, A. & Coştu, B. (2002). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının maddenin tanecikli yapısı hakkındaki anlama seviyelerinin ve yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2(2), 507-529.
• Philipp, S.B., Johnson, D.K. & Yezierski, E.J. (2014). Development of a protocol to evaluate the use of representations in secondary chemistry instruction. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 15, 777-786.
• Prieto, A., Blanco, A. & Rodriguez, A. (1989). The ideas of 11 to 14-year-old students about the nature of solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 451-463.
• Rowell, J.A. & Dawson, C.J. (1977). Teaching about floating and sinking: an attempt to link cognitive psychology with classroom practice. Science Education, 61(2), 245-253.
• Rusçuklu, P. & Özdilek, Z. (2019). Bütünleştirilmiş anlaşma halkaları ve TGA yönteminin çözünürlüğe etki eden faktörler konusundaki kavramsal anlamaya etkisi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 621-648.
• Schmidt, H.J. (1997). Students' misconceptions - looking for a pattern. Science Education 81(2), 123-135.
• Şen, Ş. & Yılmaz, A. (2012). Erime ve çözünmeyle ilgili kavram yanılgılarının ontoloji temelinde incelenmesi. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,1(1), 54-72.
• Stavy, R. (1990). Children’s conception of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247-266.
• Strauss, S. (1981). Cognitive development in school and out. Cognition, 10(1-3), 295-300.
• Taber, K.S. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 597-608.
• Tamkavas, Ç.H., Kıray, S.A., Koçak, A. & Koçak, N. (2016). Studies conducted on misconceptions about heat and temperature in Turkey between 2005-2015: A content analysis. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10 (2), 426-446.
• Valandines, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 249-262.
• van Riesen, S.A.N., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A. & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327-1344.
• Vikström, A. (2014). What makes the difference? Teachers explore what must be taught and what must be learned to understand the particulate character of matter. Science Teacher Education, 25, 709-727.
• Yağbasan, R. & Gülçiçek, Ç. (2003). Fen öğretiminde kavram yanılgılarının karakteristiklerinin tanımlanması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 102- 119.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.