___

• Alexander Denis ve Ronald L. Numbers, “Introduction” Biology and Ideology: From Descartes to Dawkins, edit. Denis Alexander ve Ronald L. Numbers, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2010, ss. 1-10.
• Barnes Barry ve David Bloor, “Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge” The Sociology of Knowledge, edit. Volker Meja ve Nico Stehr (der), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub., 1999. ss. 235—261.
• Barnes Barry, T. S. Kuhn ve Sosyal Bilimler, çev. Hüsamettin Arslan, İstanbul, Paradigma Yayıncılık, 2008.
• Bernstein Richard J., Objektivizm ve Rölativizmin Ötesi: Bilim Hermenoytik ve Praxis, çev. Feridun Yılmaz, İstanbul, Paradigma Yayıncılık, 2009.
• Bird Alexander, “Thomas Kuhn”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edit. Edward N. Zalta, (Çevrimiçi) http://plato.stanf0rd. edu/archives/spr2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/ 08-08—2012.
• Bird Alexander, Philosophy of Science, Oxon Routledge, 2005.
• Bloor David, “Anti-Latour”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30, 1, 1999, ss. 81—112.
• Bloor David, Knowledge and Social Imagery, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991.
• Bowler Peter J. ve Iwan Rhys Morus, Making Modern Science: Historical Survey, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2005.
• Cevizci Ahmet, Felsefe Sözlüğü, Paradigma Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2010.
• Couvalis George, The Philosophy of Science: Science and Objectivity, Sage Publications, Londra, 1997.
• Cushing James T., Fizikte Felsefi Kavramlar: Felsefe ve Bilimsel Kuramlar Arasındaki Tarihsel İlişki, c. I-Il, çev. Özgür Sarıoğlu, Sabancı Üniversitesi, İstanbul, 2010.
• Devitt Michael, ““Realism-Anti-Realism”, The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, edit. Stathis Psillos ve Martin Curd, Routledge, Londra, 2008.
• Feyerabend Paul, “Consolations For the Specialist”, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edit. Imre Lakatos ve Alan Musgrave, Cambridge University Press, Londra, 1999, ss:197-230.
• Halfpenny Peter, “Rasyonalite ve Bilimsel Bilginin Sosyolojisi”, Bilim Sosyolojisi İncelemeleri: Temel Yaklaşımlar, Kavramlar Ve Tartışmalar, çev. Dilek Hattatoğlu, ss. 58-64.
• Heidarzadeh Tofıgh, History of Physical Theories of Comets, from Aristotle to Whipple, Springer, 2008.
• Hess David J., Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction, New York University Press, New York, 1997.
• Hessen Boris, “Newton’un Principia’sının Toplumsal ve Ekonomik Kökenleri”, Bilim Sosyolojisi İncelemeleri: Temel Yaklaşımlar, Kavramlar Ve Tartışmalar, çev. Eren Buğlalılar, ss. 65—147.
• Kragh Helge, “Social Constructivism: The Gospel of Science, and the Teaching of Physics” Constructivism in Science Education: Philosophical Examination, edit. Michael R. Matthews, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1998, ss. 125—137.
• Krebs Robert E., Scientific Development and Misconceptions through the Ages: Reference Guide, Westport, Greenwood, 1999.
• Krementsov, Nikolai, “Darwinism, Marxism, and Genetics in the Soviet Union” Biology and Ideology: From Descartes to Dawkins, ss. 215-246.
• Kuhn Thomas S., “Bilimsel Araştırmada Dogmanın İşlevi”, Bilim Sosyolojisi İncelemeleri: Temel Yaklaşımlar, Kavramlar Ve Tartışmalar, çev. Barış Yıldırım, ss. 196—220.
• Kuhn Thomas S., “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ss. 1-23.
• Kuhn Thomas S., Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı, Çeviren: Nilüfer Kuyaş, Alan Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 1991.
• Lakatos, Imre, “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ss. 91—196.
• Mauss Marcel, Sosyoloji ve Antropoloji, çev. Özcan Doğan, Doğu Batı, Ankara, 2006.
• Mulkay Michael, “Norms and Ideology in Science”, Social Science Information, 15, 4, 1976, SS. 637-656
• Nola Robert ve Gürol Irzık, Philosophy, Science, Education and Culture, Springer, Dordrecht, 2005.
• Nola Robert, “Social Studies of Science”, The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, edit. Stathis Psillos ve Martin Curd, Routledge, New York, 2008, ss. 259—268.
• Nola Robert, Rescuing Reason, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003.
• Nye Mary Jo, Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 201 1.
• Okasha Samir, Philosophy of Science: Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
• Polanyi Michael, “Bilimsel İnançlar”, Bilim Sosyolojisi İncelemeleri: Temel Yaklaşımlar, Kavramlar Ve Tartışmalar, çev. Barış Yıldırım, ss. 180—195.
• Reichenbach Hans, Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of The Foundations and The Structure of Knowledge, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1938.
• Rescorla Michael, “Convention”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edit. Edward N. Zalta, (Çevrimiçi) http:/!plato.stanford. edu/archives/spr201 1/entries/convention/ 02-09—2012.
• Rincon Paul, “The Girl who Named Planet” (Gezegenin İsmini Koyan Kız) BBC Resmi lnternet Sitesi, (Çevrimiçi) http:/!news.bbc.co.uk/2/ hi/science/nature/4596246.stm 11—04-2013.
• Rupke Nicolaas, “Darwin’s Choice”, Biology and Ideology: From Descartes to Dawkins, ss. 139—164.
• Salmon Wesley C., “Rationality and Objectivity in Science or Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes” The Philosophy of Science, edit. David Papineau, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996, ss. 256—289.
• Schiemann Gregor, “The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism: Re— evaluation and Future Perspectives,” The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism, edit. Friedrich Stadler, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2003, ss. 237—251.
• Shapere Dudley, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, The Philosophical Review, 73, 3, 1964, ss. 383-394.
• Stanford Kyle, “Underdetermination of Scientific Theory”, edit. Edward N. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy, (Çevrimiçi) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/Win2009/entries/scientificunderdetermination/ 03-09-2012.
• Swoyer Chris, “Relativism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy, edit. Edward N. Zalta, (Çevrimiçi) plato.stanford.edu/archives/ Win2010/entries/relativisml, 11-09-2012.
• Uebel Thomas E. ve Alan W. Richardson, “Introduction”, The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, edit. Thomas E. Uebel ve Alan W. Richardson, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007, ss. 1—10.
• Woolgar Steve, Bilim: Bilim İdesi Üzerine Sosyolojik Bir Deneme, çev. Hüsamettin Arslan, Paradigma Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 1999.