A randomized trial of the effectiveness of an ultrasonic denture hygiene intervention program among communitydwelling elders

A randomized trial of the effectiveness of an ultrasonic denture hygiene intervention program among communitydwelling elders

Purpose This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasonic denture hygiene interventions in improving denture cleanliness among elderly individuals. Materials and Methods Sixty-six participants who had received upper metal framework removable partial dentures within the past 5 years were randomly allocated into three denture hygiene intervention groups: group 1 (mechanical cleaning with a toothbrush and ultrasonic cleaning with cetylpyridinium chloride), group 2 (mechanical cleaning with a toothbrush and ultrasonic cleaning with distilled water), and control (mechanical cleaning with a toothbrush only). Denture cleanliness was assessed at baseline and 1-month using: i) Denture Cleanliness Index (DCI) scores; ii) plaque coverage percentage; and (iii) microbiological samples for bacterial and yeast detection. Differences between groups were assessed with one-way analysis of variance and Chi-squared tests. Results Mean DCI scores and mean percentages of plaque coverage area were significantly reduced in group 1 and group 2, compared to the control group for both cobalt chromium (CoCr) and acrylic fitting surfaces (p<0.001). No significant differences were found between groups 1 and 2 with regard to the prevalence and viable counts of yeasts or total microbial viable counts. No significant differences in the investigated clinical and microbiological parameters were observed between CoCr and acrylic surfaces following the intervention period. Conclusion The ultrasonic cleaner was significantly more effective than mechanical cleaning in the reduction of biofilm coverage on metal framework removable partial dentures over a 1-month intervention period. Nevertheless, the adjunctive use of cetylpyridinium chloride with ultrasonic cleaning did not yield additional benefits.

___

  • 1. Department of Health. Oral Health Survey 2011. Hong Kong: Department of Health, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 2011, p.1-226.
  • 2. Murtomaa H, Meurman JH. Mechanical aids in the prevention of dental diseases in the elderly. Int Dent J 1992; 42: 365-72. 3. Jorge Junior J, de Almeida OP, Bozzo L, Scully C, Graner E. Oral mucosal health and disease in institutionalized elderly in Brazil. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991; 19: 173-5.
  • 4. Coulthwaite L, Verran J. Evaluation of in vivo denture plaque assessment methods. Br Dent J 2009; 207: E12.
  • 5. Blahut P. A clinical trial of the INTERPLAK powered toothbrush in a geriatric population. Compend Suppl 1993; 16: S606-10.
  • 6. Quagliarello V, Juthani-Mehta M, Ginter S, Towle V, Allore H, Tinetti M. Pilot testing of intervention protocols to prevent pneumonia in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: 1226-31.
  • 7. Clavero J, Baca P, Junco P, Gonzalez MP. Effects of 0.2% chlorhexidine spray applied once or twice daily on plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation in a geriatric population. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 773-7.
  • 8. Lopez RM, Uribe MR, Rodriguez BO, Casasempere IV. Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study. Gerodontology 2013; 30: 112-8.
  • 9. de Souza RF, de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos H, Lovato da Silva CH, Abu-Naba'a L, Fedorowicz Z, Gurgan CA. Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 4: CD007395.
  • 10. Felton D, Cooper L, Duqum I, Minsley G, Guckes A, Haug S, Meredith P, Solie C, Avery D, Chandler ND, American College of Prosthodontists. Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists. J Prosthodont 2011; 20: S1-12.
  • 11. Cruz PC, Andrade IM, Peracini A, de Souza-Gugelmin MCM, Silva-Lovato CH, de Souza RF, de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos H. The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19: 668-73.
  • 12. Gjermo P, Baastad KL, Rolla G. The plaque-inhibiting capacity of 11 antibacterial compounds. J Periodontal Res 1970; 5: 102-9.
  • 13. Felipucci DN, Davi LR, Paranhos HF, Bezzon OL, Silva RF, Pagnano VO. Effect of different cleansers on the surface of removable partial denture. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 392-7.
  • 14. Au KY, Cheung HC, Chung SM, Lai CF, Leung KK, Leung YF, Ng YC, Wah YS, Wong CL. Community Health Project: effectiveness of a denture hygiene intervention programme among institutionalized elders. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong 2015, p.1-68.
  • 15. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964; 22: 121-35.
  • 16. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 1975; 25: 229-35.
  • 17. Petersen PE, Baez RJ. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5th Ed., Geneva: World Health Organization 2013, p.1-125.
  • 18. Mylonas P, Afzal Z, Attrill DC. A clinical audit of denture cleanliness in general dental practice undertaken in the West Midlands. Br Dent J 2014; 217: 231-4.
  • 19. Perezous LF, Stevenson GC, Flaitz CM, Goldschmidt ME, Engelmeier RL, Nichols CM. The effect of complete dentures with a metal palate on candida species growth in HIV-infected patients. J Prosthodont 2006; 15: 306-15.
  • 20. Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW, Lamey PJ, Ferguson MM. A comparison of oral rinse and imprint sampling techniques for the detection of yeast, coliform and Staphylococcus aureus carriage in the oral cavity. J Oral Pathol 1986; 15: 386-8.
  • 21. Nishi Y, Seto K, Kamashita Y, Kaji A, Kurono A, Nagaoka E. Survival of microorganisms on complete dentures following ultrasonic cleaning combined with immersion in peroxide-based cleanser solution. Gerodontology 2014; 31: 202-9.
  • 22. de Andrade IM, Cruz PC, da Silva CH, de Souza RF, de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos H, Candido RC, Marin JM, de Souza-Gugelmin MCM. Effervescent tablets and ultrasonic devices against Candida and mutans streptococci in denture biofilm. Gerodontology 2011; 28: 264-70.
  • 23. Duyck J, Vandamme K, Krausch-Hofmann S, Boon L, De Keersmaecker K, Jalon E, Teughels W. Impact of denture cleaning method and overnight storage condition on denture biofilm mass and composition: a cross-over randomized clinical trial. PloS one 2016; 11: e0145837.
  • 24. Papadiochou S, Polyzois G. Hygiene practices in removable prosthodontics: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2018; 16: 179-201.
  • 25. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 68-81.
  • 26. Dhiman RK, Chowdhury SR. Midline fractures in single maxillary complete acrylic vs flexible dentures. Med J Armed Forces India 2009; 65: 141-5.
European Oral Research-Cover
  • ISSN: 2630-6158
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1967
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Üniversitesi