Transüretral rezeksiyon girişimlerinde bipolar ve monopolar rezektoskop kullanımının hemodinami ve serum elektrolitlerine etkisi
Çalışmamızda, spinal anestezi altında transüretral prostat rezeksiyonu uygulanan hastalarda monopolar, ve bipolar rezektoskop kullanımının hemodinami, serum elektrolitleri,üretral kateter, süresi ve hastanede kalış süresi üzerine olan etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Fakülte Etik Kurul onayı ve hasta onamı alındıktan sonra, 60 hastayı rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Çalışma grubunda bipolar. (Grup B) (n=30), kontrol grubunda monopolar (Grup M)(n=30) rezektoskop ile TUR-P uygulanması planlandı. Tüm olgulara spinal anestezi uygulandı. .Operasyon süresince 5 dakika arayla kan basıncı, kalp atım hızı ve solunum sayıları izlendi. Operasyon öncesi, operasyonun 30. dk'sında, operasyon bittikten 1 ve ' 24 saat sonra; serum Na+, K+, Cl', hemoglobin ve hematokrit düzeyleri ' ölçüldü. Üretral kataterizasyon ve hastanede kalma süreleri kaydedildi. Grup M'deki olgularda kontrol değerine göre 25. ve 3O.dk'larda kari basıncında, belirgin düşmeler olduğu gözlendi. (p
The effects of bipolar and monopolar resectoscope on hemodynamic and plasma elctrolytes in transurethral resection procedures
In our study, we compared the effects of monopolarm and bipolar resectoscope use on hemodynamics, serum electrolytes, and length of hospital stay of patients who is undergoing TUR-P with spinal , anesthesia. After approval of the Faculty Ethical Committee and the written consent of the patients, 60 patients are randomly allocated into two groups that is planned to perform TUR-P with bipolar resectoscope (Group B)(n=30) group and monopolar resectoscope (Group M)(n=30), respectively. Spinal anesthesia had been performed to alj patients. Blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate were monitorized with five minutes periods during the operation. Serum Na\ K+, Cl", Hb ve Hct values measured before the operation, at 30. , minute of the operation, 1., 24. h after the operation. Urethral catheterization time and length of hospital stay had been recorded. In Group M , blood pressure of the patients at 25th and 30th minutes had been decreased significantly comparison to the control values (p
___
- l.Glynn PJ, Campion EW, Bouchard GR, Silbert JE. The development of benign prostatic hyperplasia among volunteers in the normative aging study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:78-90
- 2. Near DE. Transurethral prostatectomy. Br J Surg
- 1994;81:484-5
- 3. Tkocz M, Prajsner A. Comparison of long-term results
of transurethral incision of the prostate with transurethral
resection of the prostate, in patients with benign prostatic
hypertrophy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:112-6
- 4.Yang Q, Peters TJ, Donovan JL, Wilt TJ, Abrams P. Transurethral incision compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Urol. 2001;165:1526-32
- 5. Madersbacher S, Marberger M. Is transurethral resection
of the prostate still justified? BJU Int. 1999;83:227-37
- 6. Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC, Elinson J, Keller
AM, Henderson WG, et al. A comparison of transurethral
surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms
of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs
Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of
the Prostate. New Engl J Med. 1995;332:75-9
- 7. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP
- Anesthesia for genitourinary surgery. Morgan E, Mikhail
MS, Murray JM, Larson C, eds. Clinical Anesthesiology,
3rd ed. USA: McGraw-Hill Companies. 2002;36:692-707
- 8. Kayhan Z. Boşaltım Sistemi ve Anestezi. Klinik Anestezi
- 2. baskı. İstanbul: Logos Yayıncılık; 1997;27:340-54
- 9. Gravenstein D. Transurethral resection of the prostate
(TURP) syndrome: A review of the pathophysiology and
management. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:438-46
- 10. Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT. Transurethral
prostatectomy-immediate and postoperative complications:
A operative study 13 participating institutions evaluating
3885 patients. J Urol. 1989;141:243-7
- 11. Jensen V. The TURP syndrome. Can J Anaesth
- 1991;38:90-6
- 12. Borboroglu PG, Kane a, Ward JF, Roberts JL, Sands
JP. Immediate and postoperative complications of
transurethral prostatectomy in the 1990s. J Urol
- 1999; 162:1307-10
- 13. Concato J, Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR, Elmore JG, Schiff
SF. Problems of comorbidity in mortality after
prostatectomy. JAMA. 1992;267:1077-82
- 14. Roos NP, Wennberg JE, Malenka DJ. Mortality and
reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the
prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med
- 1389;320:1120-4
- 15. Hammadeh MY, Madaan S, Singh M, Philp T. A 3-
year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing
transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate with
standard transurethral prostatectomy. BJU Int
- 2000;86:648-51
- 16. Loh SY, Chin CM. A demographic profile of patients
undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate for
benign prostate hyperplasia and presenting in acute
urinary retention. BJU Int. 2002;89:531-3
- 17. Boyle P, Robertson C, Vaughan ED, Fitzpatrick JM
- A meta-analysis of trials of transurethral needle ablation
for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia
- BJU Int. 2004;94:83-8
- 18. Dawkins GP, Miller RA. Sorbitol-mannitol solution for
urological electrosurgical resection: A safer fluid than
glycine 1.5% Eur Urol. 1999;36:99-102
- 19. Hahn RG. Smoking increases the risk of large scale
fluid absorption during transurethral prostatic resection
- J Urol. 2001;166:162-5
- 20. Erturhan S, Erbagci A, Seckiner I, Yagci F, Ustun A
- Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard
transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective
randomized trial with 1-year follow-up. Prostate Cancer
Prostatic Dis. 2007;10:97-100
- 21. Dincel C, Samli MM, Güler C, Demirbaş M, Karalar
M. Plasma kinetic vaporization of the prostate: clinical
evaluation of a new technique. J Endourol. 2004; 18:293-8
- 22. Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, Vani K. Bipolar
versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate:
randomized controlled study. J Endourol. 2005; 19:333-8
- 23. Ho HS, Yip SK, Urn KB, Fook S, Foo KT, Cheng CW
- A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar
and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using
transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur
Urol. 2007;52:517-22
- 24. Botto H, Lebret T, Barre P, Orsoni JL, Herve JM. Luga
gne PM. J Endourol. 2001;15:313-6
- 25. Fung BT, Li SK, Yu CF, Lau BE, Hou SS. Prospective
randomized controlled trial comparing plasmakinetic
vaporesection and conventional transurethral resection
of the prostate. Asian J Surg. 2005;28:24-28
26. Helke C, Manseck A, Hakenberg OW, Wirth MP. Is
transurethral vaporesection of the prostate better than
standard transurethral resection? Eur Urol. 2001;39:551-7
- 27. Hammarsten J, Lidqvist K, Sunzel H. Urethral stricture
following transurethral resection of the prostate. The
role of the catheter. Br J Urol. 1989;63:397-400
- 28. Hart AJ, Fowler JW. Incidence of urethral stricture after transurethral resection of prostate. Effects of urinary infection, urethralflora and catheter material and size. Urology. 1981;18:558-91