Clinical results after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

-
Anahtar Kelimeler:

-

Clinical results after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Keywords:

-,

___

  • Linberg JV, Mc Cormick SA. Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obsruction; a clinicopathologic report and biopsy technique. Ophthalmology 1986;93:1055-63.
  • MacEven CJ, Young JDH, Barras CW, Ram B, White PS. Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora. Br J Ophtalmol 2001;85;314-8.
  • Çinal A, Kutluhan A, Yaşar T, Şimşek Ş, Kırış M, İçli M. The comparison of the internal and external methods in the surgical treatment of chronic dacryocystitis. T Oft Gaz 1999;29:292-7.
  • Küpper DS, Demarco RC, Resende R, et al. Endoscopic nasal dacryocystorhinostomy:result and advantages over the ex- ternal approach. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2005;71:356-60
  • Knijnik D.Endonasal dacryocystrhinostomy in children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2005;71:726-8.
  • Kuchar A, Lukas J, Steinkogler FJ. Bacteriology and an- tibiotic therapy in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruc- tion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:694-8.
  • Whittet HB, Shun-shin GA, Awdry P. Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye 1993:7:545-9.
  • Kong YT, Kim TI, Byung WK. A report of 131 cases of endoscopic laser lacrimal surgery. Opthalmology 1994:101:1793-800.
  • Bartley GB. Acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction: an etiologic classification system, case reports and review of literature. Opthalmol Plast Reconstr Surg 1992:8:237-42.
  • Yung MW, Hardman_Lea S. Analysis of the results of surgi- cal endoscopic dacryocytorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 2002: 86: 792-4.
  • Akıner M, Anadolu Y, Aktürk T, Uğurlubaş SH, Zilelioğlu G. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;4:44-8.
  • Weıdnbecher M, Hosemann W, Buhr W; Endoscopic endo- nasal dacryocystorhinostomy; Results in 56 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103;363-7.
  • Önerci M, Orhan M. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhi- nostomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;2(3):219-22.
  • Mclahlan DL, Shannon GM, Flanagan JC:Results of dac- ryocystorhinostomy Analysis of reoperations. Ophthalmic Surg 1980;11:427-30.
  • Benger R, Forer M. Endonasal dacryocystorhinos- tomy primary and secondary. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1993;21(3):157-9.
  • Rice DH. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinosto- my in four patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116(9):1061.
  • Mcdonogh M. Endoscopic Transnasal Dacryocystorhinostomy. Endoscopic transnasal dacryo- cystorhinostomy. Results in 21 patients. S Afr J Surg 1992;30(3):107-10.
  • Önerci M, Orhan M, Öğretmenoğlu O, İrkeç M. Long- term results and reasons for failure of intranasal Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120(2):319-22.
  • Sodhi PK, Pandey RM, Malik KPS. Experience with bicana- licular intubation of the lacrimal drainage apparatus combined with conventional external dacryocystorhinos- tomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003;31:187-90
  • Argın A, Duman S, Örnek F. The role of the silicon intu- bation in dacryocystorhinostomy (Turkish). J Mersin Univ Med Faculty 2001;3:281-4
  • Metson R. The Endoscopic Approach for Revision Dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope1990;100:1344-7.
  • Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PA. The evolution of endo- nasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surg Ophthalmol 2003;48: 73-84.
  • Ünlü HH, Toprak B, Aslan A, Güler C. Comparison of surgi- cal outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinosto- my with and without silicone intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111: 704-9.
  • Şan İ, Gürler B. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: ‘Operative problems in the initial cases’. Turk Arch Otolaryngol 2002;40:258-63
  • Munk PL, Lin DT, Morris DC. Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystorhinostomy with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 1990; 177(13):687-90.
  • Luchtenberg M, Kuhli C, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Yan B, Ohrloff C, Berkefeld J. Three-dimensional rota- tional dacryocystography for imaging of the lacrimal draining system and adjacent anatomical structures. Ophthalmologica 2005;219(3):136-41.
  • Yoshii M. External Dacryocystorhinostomy: outcomes af- ter the introduction of two new forceps and transnasal endoscopy. Med Sci Monit 2004;10(3):39-42.
  • Yazici B, Yazici Z. Final nasolacrimal ostium after ex- ternal dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121(1):76-80.
  • Boboridis KG, Bunce C, Rose GE. Outcome of external dac- ryocystorhinostomy combined with membranectomy of a distal canalicular obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139(6):1051-5.
  • Kashkouli MB, Parvaresh M, Modarreszadeh M, Hashemi M, Beigi B. Factors affecting the success of external dac- ryocystorhinostomy. Orbit 2003; 22(4):247-55.
  • Groessl SA, Sires BS, Bradley N. An anatomical basis for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:71-4
  • Örnek F, Duman S, Kasım A. The causes of the lacrimal drainage system obstructions that can not be monitorized with a contrast agent and the surgical approach. T Klin Ophtalmology 1996;5(3):206-8.
  • Cuthbertson FM, Webber S. Assessment of functional na- solacrimal duct obstruction survey of ophthalmologists in the southwest. Eye 2004;18(1):20-3.
  • Becker BB. Dacryocystorhinostomy without flaps. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;19(6):419-27.
  • Boush GA, Bradley NL. Dortzbach RK. Results of endona- sal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Opthalmology 1994:101:955-59 .
  • Wearne M, Pitts J, Frank J, and Rose G. Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the di- agnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83(9):1032–5.
  • Çokkeser Y, Evreklioğlu C, Er H. Comparative exter- nal versus endoscopic dacryocytorhinostomy: Results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000:123(4): 488-91.
European Journal of General Medicine-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Sağlık Bilimleri Araştırmaları Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Diaphragmatic hernia as an unusual cause of respiratory distress in postopertive-postpartum period

Ahmet Cantug CALISKAN, Serkan BODUR, Hakan AYTAN, İsmet GUN, Berat ACU

Computed tomography coronary angiography as initial work-up for stable angina.

George KOULAOUZİDİS, Allison POWELL, Tony MCARTHUR, Paul JENKİNS, David BRENNAND-ROPER

Clinical results after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

M Hafit GÜR, Köksal YUCA, Adnan CİNAL, A.faruk KIROĞLU, Hakan ÇANKAYA, Y Kursad Varsak

Impact of weight loss on psychological well being and biochemical modulation in obese patients : A comparison of two treatment protocols.

Shehab Mahmoud Abd EL-KADER, Doaa Ahmed KHALİFA

Dental treatment of a xeroderma pigmentosum patient

Zeynep Başak ÖKTEM, Efsun SONGÜR, Firdevs Tulga ÖZ

Lactate clearance is a prognostic factor in patients on shock state.

Alvaro MONTİEL-JARQUİN, İrai LASCAREZ-LAGUNAS, Carlos SANCHEZ-GASCA, Laura LASCAREZ-LAGUNAS, Eugenio GARCİA-CANO, Eduardo GOMEZ-CONDE, Mario GARCİA-CARRASCO, Aurelio LOPEZ-COLOMBO, María Eugenia Guerrero-Fernández

A case of chronic tophaceous gout treated mistakenly as rheumatoid arthritis for one year

Hasan ULUSOY, Gurkan AKGOL, Arif GULKESEN, Ayhan KAMANLİ

Type 1 second degree AV block in acute rheumatic fever: A rare presentation.

Muzafar NAİK, Tariq BHAT, Mubaraq NAQASH, İrfan YAQOOB

Comparison of local anaesthetic mixtures with tramadol or fentanyl for axillary plexus block in orthopaedic upper extremity surgery

Şükran GEZE, Hülya ULUSOY, Engin ERTÜRK, Bahanur ÇEKİC, Cevahir ARDUC