The Effect of Body Shape Type on Differentiability of Traditional and Geometric Morphometric Methods: A Case Study of Channa gachua (Hamilton, 1822)
The Effect of Body Shape Type on Differentiability of Traditional and Geometric Morphometric Methods: A Case Study of Channa gachua (Hamilton, 1822)
Objective: The morphological differences of two populations of the Dwarf snakehead, Channa gachua (Hamilton, 1822)from Sarbaz (Makran basin) and Halil (Hamun-e Jaz Murian basin) rivers were studied using geometric and traditionalmorphometrics (GM and TM) methods to test the hypothesis that the type of body shape can produce different results.Materials and Methods: A total of 16 landmark-points and 12 distance measurements were defined to analyse the bodyshape differences and the extracted data were analyzed using GM and TM methods.Results: Our findings reject the hypothesis, and the results revealed that GM is more effective in detecting meticulousmorphological differences.Conclusion: In addition, the results suggest selecting a proper method i.e. GM or TM, based on the degree of accuracyneeded i.e. if we need to find small shape differences within its signification, GM is a superior technique, or to show the typeof differences, then we can use TM.
___
- 1. Ambrosio PP, Costa C, Sánchez P, Flos R. Stocking density and its
influence on shape of Senegalese sole adults. Aqua Inter 2008;
16(4): 333.
- 2. Jalili P, Eagderi S, Keivany Y. Body shape comparison of Kura bleak
(Alburnus filippii) in Aras and Ahar-Chai rivers using geometric
morphometric approach. Res Zool 2015; 5(1): 20-4.
- 3. Karpouzi VS, Stergiou KI. The relationships between mouth size
and shape and body length for 18 species of marine fishes and
their trophic implications. J fish biol 2003; 62(6): 1353-65.
- 4. Loy A, Cataudella S, Corti M. Shape changes during the growth
of the sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax (Teleostea: Perciformes),
in relation to different rearing conditions. In Advances in
morphometrics (1996; 399-405). Springer, Boston, MA.
- 5. Smith TB, Skulason S. Evolutionary significance of resource
polymorphisms in fishes, amphibians, and birds. Annu Rev Ecol
Syst 1996, 111-33.
- 6. Webb PW. Locomotor patterns in theevolution of actinopterygian
fishes. Am Zool 1982; 22: 329-42.
- 7. Mouludi Saleh A, Keivany Y, Jalali SAH. Biometry of Chub (Squalius
namak Khaefi et al., 2016) in rivers of Namak Basin. J Experiment
Anim Biol 2018; 7(1): 107-18.
- 8. Radkhah A, Poorbagher H, Eagderi S. Investigation of
morphological differences of Capoeta capoeta populations in
the upstream and downstream of Zarinerood River in Urmia Lake
Basin. J Anim Env 2016; 8(3): 167-74.
- 9. Salehinia D, Eagderi S, Khorasani NA, Zamani-Faradonbeh M.
Impact of Sangban Dam on the morphologicl chaactrestics of
Siah mahi (Capoeta gracilis, keyserling, 1864) populations using
traditional and geometric morphometrics techniques. J Anim Env
2016; 8(2): 97-104.
- 10. Eagderi S, Esmaeilzadegan E, Madah A, Body shape variation in
riffle minnows (Alburnoides eichwaldii De Filippii, 1863) populations
of Caspian Sea basin. J Biosystem Taxon 2013; 5(14): 1-8.
- 11. Eagderi S, Esmaeilzadegan E, Pirbeigi A. Morphological responses
of Capoeta gracilis and Alburnoides eichwaldii populations
(Cyprinidae) fragmented due to Tarik Dam (Sefidrud River, Caspian
Sea basin, Iran). Iranian J Ichthyol 2014; 1(2): 114-20.
- 12. Mouludi-Saleh A, Keivany Y. Morphological diversity in three
species of Chubs (Squalius spp.) populations in Iranian Basins.
Nova Biol Reperta 2018a; 5(2): 192-204.
- 13. Mouludi-Saleh A, Keivany Y. Morphometric analysis of Squalius
namak Khaefi et al. 2016 in Khaznagh and Ghare-Chai rivers. Sri
Lanka J Aqua Sci 2018b; 23(2): 173-8.
- 14. Nasri M, Eagderi S, Farahmand H, Segherloo IH, Body shape
comparison of Cyprinion macrostomum (Heckel, 1843) and
Cyprinion watsoni (Day, 1872) using geometric morphometric
method. Inter J Aqua Biol 2013; 1(5): 240-4.
- 15. Nasri M, Eagderi S, Keivany Y, Farahmand H, Dorafshan S,
Nezhadheydari H. Morphological diversity of Cyprinion Heckel,
1843 species (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in Iran. Iranian J Ichthyol 2018;
5(2): 96-108.
- 16. Razavipour P, Eagderi S, Poorbagher H, Javanshir Khooi A, Keivany
Y. Comparative study of morphological characteristics of Tuini
fish (Capoeta damascina) in inland water of Iran using geometic
morphometric method. J Fish 2015; 8(1): 79-90.
- 17. Zamani Faradonbeh M, Eagderi S, Nasri M. Geometrics
morphometric comparison of populations of waspi Cabdio morar
(Hamilton, 1822) in Mashkil and Mokran basins. Iranian Sci Fish J
2014; 23(2): 57-67.
- 18. Coad BW, Freshwater Fishes of Iran (Available at http://www.
briancoad.com) (accessed on 4 March 2019).
- 19. Elliott NG, K. Haskard JA. Koslow. Morphometric analysis of orange
roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) off the continental slope of
southern Australia. J Fish Biol 1995; 46:202-20.
- 20. Zamani Faradonbe M, Eagderi S, Moradi M. Patterns of Body Shape
Variation in Capoeta gracilis (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Relation to
Environmental Variables in Sefidrud River Basin, Iran. J Appl Biol
Sci 2015; 9(1): 36-42.
- 21. Langerhans RB, Layman CA, Langerhans AK, DeWitt TJ. Habitatassociated
morphological divergence in two Neotropical fish
species. Biol J Linn Soc 2003; 80: 689-98.
- 22. Kassen B, Bell G. Experimental evolution in Chlamydomonas. IV.
Selection in Environments that vary through time at different
scales. Heredity 1998; 80:732-41.