“Small Protected Areas” for Conservation Priorities in South Anatolia (Başkonuş Mountain-Kahramanmaraş)

Objective: The Başkonuş Mountain (Kahramanmaraş) is located in the transition zone of Irano-Turan and Mediterraneanplant geographical regions and in the southern part of the Anatolian Diagonal. A specific region in the East Mediterraneanbasin consists of an area that holds great biological importance and is a world hotspot. In this study, the small protected areasof the Başkonuş Mountain were determined.Materials and Methods: A total of 17 endemic and 9 rare taxa were selected based on their IUCN statutes, altitudes, andhabitats. Their GPS coordinates were loaded on a computer and digitized in a map projection system. Distributions of theselected taxa were marked on a topographic map in the scale of 1/25.000. The 26 maps were overlapped so that the areas ofplant biodiversity could be observed on the map.Results: Six small protected areas were defined on the Başkonuş Mountain. Several threats and conservation suggestionswere presented in this study.Conclusion: Local data about biodiversity sources are limited. Thus, conservation biologists and government offices shouldplay active roles in formal educational settings and employ alternative methods to the community in Kahramanmaraş.

PDF

___

1. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000; 403(6772): 853-8.
2. Médail F, Quézel P. Biodiversity Hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting Global Conservation Priorities. Conserv Biol 1999; 13(6): 1510-3.
3. Sekercioglu CH, Anderson A, Akcay E, Bilgin R, Can OE, Semiz G, et al. Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biol Conserv 2011; 144: 2752-69.
4. Abdulmalak D, Al Khader I, Al Jbour S, Arcos J, Ataol M, Azafzaf H, et al. Mediterranean Basin Biodiversity Hotspot. Ankara: Doğa Derneği; 2010.
5. Özhatay N. Important Plant Areas along the BTC Pipeline in Turkey. Istanbul; BTC Şirketi; 2006.
6. Ekim T. Türkiye’nin bitkileri. In: Eken G, Bozdogan M, Isfendiyaroglu S, Kılıc, DT, Lise Y. Eds.), Türkiye’nin Önemli Doğa Alanları. Ankara, Turkey, Doğa Derneği (in Turkish); 2006. pp. 47-8.
7. Özhatay N, Byfield A, Atay S. Important Plant Areas in Turkey: 122 Key Turkish Botanical Sties. İstanbul; WWF-Turkey; 2005. p. 442.
8. Aytac Z, Duman H. The steppic flora of high mounts Ahir, Öksüs and Binboğa (Kahramanmaraş- Kayseri-Turkey). Fl Med 2005; 15: 121-78.
9. Yıldız B. Kahramanmaraş. In: Özhatay N, (Ed.). Important Plant Areas along the BTC Pipeline in Turkey. Istanbul, Turkey; BTC Şirketi; 2006. pp. 241-264.
10. Ozhatay N, İlcim A, Ok, T. Ahır Dağı’ nın sessiz güzelleri “200 Yabani Çiçek”. İstanbul; Kahramanmaraş Valiliği İl Çevre ve Orman Müdürlüğü; 2009.
11. Ozhatay N, Ok T. Doğanın penceresinden Kahramanmaraş. İstanbul; Kahramanmaraş Valiliği İl Çevre ve Orman Müdürlüğü; 2008.
12. Demirci S, Ozhatay N. An ethnobotanical study in Kahramanmaraş (Turkey); Wild Plants Used For Medicinal Purpose in Andırın, Kahramanmaraş. Turk J Pharm Sci 2012; 9(1): 75-92.
13. Varol O, Tatlı A. The Vegetation of Çimen Mountain (K.Maraş). Turk J Bot 2001; 25(5): 335-58.
14. Varol O, Tatlı A. Çimen Dağı (Kahramanmaraş) Florası. Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi 2003; 12(46): 17-28.
15. Varol O, Ketenoglu O, Bingol U, Geven F, Guney K. A Phytosociological research on the coniferous forests of Başkonuş Mountain, Anti-Taurus, Turkey. Acta Botanica Hungarica 2006; 48(1-2): 195-211.
16. Varol O. Phytosociological research on maquis and steppe vegetation of Başkonuş Mountain (Kahramanmaraş-Turkey). Thaiszia Journal of Botany 2003; 13(1): 77-88.
17. Varol O, Kara C, İlcim A. New Floristic Records for C6 Grid Square. Turk J Bot 1998; 22: 299-301.
18. Varol O. Flora of Baskonus Mountain. Turk J Bot 2003; 25: 63-102.
19. Ekim T, Koyuncu M, Vural M, Duman H, Aytac Z, Adiguzel N. Red Data Book of Turkish Plants (Pteridophyta & Spermatophyta). Ankara; Turkiye Tabiatini Koruma Dernegi & Van Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi; 2000.
20. Casazza G, Barberis G, Minuto L. Ecological characteristics and raraity of endemic plants of Italian Maritime Alps. Biol Conserv 2005; 123: 361-71.
21. Nowak A, Nowak S, Nobis M. Distribution pattern, ecological characteristic and conservation status of endemic plants of Tadzhikistan-A global hotspot of diversity. J Nat Conserv 2011; 19: 296-305.
22. Favarger C. Endemism in the montane floras of Europe. In: Valentine, D.H. (Ed.), Taxonomy, Phytogeography and Evolution. London and New York; Academic Press; 1972. pp. 191-204.
23. Iatrou G. Contribution to the study of endemism of the flora of Peloponnisos. – Ph. D. thesis, Patras [in Greek with an English summary]; 1986.
24. Villar L, Garcia B. Verse une banque de donne´e`s des plantes vasculaires ende´miques des Pyre´ne´es. Acta Biol Mont 1989; 9: 261- 74.
25. Jones KR, Venter O, Fuller RA, Allan JR, Maxwell SL, Negret PJ, Watson JEM. One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 2018; 360: 788-91.
26. Piekielek NB, Hansen AJ. Extent of fragmentation of coarse-scale habitats in and around U.S. National Parks. Biol Conserv 2012; 155: 13-22.
27. Mendenhall CD, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. Improving estimates of biodiversity loss. Biol Conserv 2012; 151: 32-4.
28. Edwards DP, Laurance SG. Green labeling, sustainability and the expansion of tropical agriculture: Critical issues for certification schemes. Biol Conserv 2012; 151: 60-4.
29. Bladt J, Strange N, Abildtrup J, Svenning JC, Skov F. Conservation efficiency of geopolitical coordination in the EU. J Nat Conserv 2009; 17: 72-86.
30. Maes J, Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Dunbar MB, Alkemade R. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol Conserv 2012; 155: 1-12.
31. Brito D, Moreira DO, Coutinho BR, Oprea M. Ill nature: Disease hotspots as threats to biodiversity. J Nat Conserv 2012; 20(2): 72-5.