___

• 1. Abdula N, Macharia J, Motsoaledi A, Swaminathan S, Vijay Ragha-van K. National action for global gains in antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 2016; 387: 3-5. google scholar
• 2. Fuqua C, Greenberg EP. Self-perception in bacteria: quorum sens-ing with acylated homoserine lactones. Curr Opin Microbiol 1998; 2: 183-9. google scholar
• 3. Theodora NA, Dominika V, Waturangi DE. Screening and quantifi-cation of anti-quorum sensing and antibiofilm activities of phyllo-sphere bacteria against biofilm forming bacteria. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12(1): 732. google scholar
• 4. Zhao X, Yu Z, Ding T. Quorum-sensing regulation of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Microorganisms 2020; 8(3): 425. google scholar
• 5. Barzegari A, Kheyrolahzadeh K, Khatibi SMH, Sharifi S, Memar MY, Vahed SZ. The battle of probiotics and their derivatives against biofilms. Infect Drug Resist 2020; 13: 659-72. google scholar
• 6. KrzyzekP.Challenges and limitations ofanti-quorum sensing therapies. Front Microbiol 2019; 31(10): 2473. google scholar
• 7. Hawver LA, Jung S A, Ng WL. Specificity and complexity in bacterial quorum-sensing systems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2016; 40(5): 738-52. google scholar
• 8. Liu L, Wu R, Zhang J, Shang N, Li P. D-Ribose interferes with quo-rum sensing to inhibit biofilm formation of Lactobacillus paraplan-tarum L-ZS9. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 1860. google scholar
• 9. Jiang Q, Chen J, Yang C, Yin Y, Yao K. Quorum Sensing: A prospec-tive therapeutic target for bacterial diseases. Biomed Res Int 2019; 2015978. google scholar
• 10. Kiray E, Kariptas E, Dagli SS. Evaluation of vaginal lactobacilli with potential probiotic properties and biotherapeutic effects isolated from healthy Turkish women. Fresenius Environ Bull 2020; 29424052. google scholar
• 11. Sharma V, Harjai K, Shukla G. Effect of bacteriocin and exopoly-saccharides isolated from probiotic on P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. Folia Microbiol 2018; 63: 181-90. google scholar
• 12. Kiray E, Kariptas E, Azarkan SA. Evaluation of vaginal lactobacilli with potential probiotic properties and biotherapeutic effects iso-lated from healthy Turkish women. PSM Micro 2019; 4(3): 56-70. google scholar
• 13. Abudoleh SM, Mahasneh AM. Anti-quorum sensing activity of substances isolated from wild berry associated bacteria. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 2017; 9(1): 23-30. google scholar
• 14. Younis KM, Usup G, Ahmad A. Secondary metabolites produced by marine streptomyces as antibiofilm and anti-quorum sensing inhibitor of uropathogen Proteus mirabilis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2015; 23(5): 4756-67. google scholar
• 15. Tabbouche SA, Gurgen A, Yildiz S, Kilic AO, Sokmen M. Antimicro-bial and antiquorum sensing activity of some wild mushrooms collected from Turkey. MSU J Sci 2017; 5(2): 453-7. google scholar
• 16. Han MSA, Zahin M, Hasan S, Husain FM, Ahmad I. Inhibition of quo-rum sensing regulated bacterial functionsby plant essential oils with special reference to clove oil. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009; 49(3): 354-60. google scholar
• 17. Vissers YM, Snel J, Zuurendonk PF, Smit BA, Wichers HJ, Savelkoul HFJ. Differential effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacil-lus plantarum strains on cytokine induction in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010; 59(1): 60-70. google scholar
• 18. Forsberg MM, Björkander S, Pang Y, Lundqvist L, Ndi M, Ott M, et al. Extracellular membrane vesicles from lactobacilli dampen IFN-y responses in a monocyte-dependent Manner Sci Rep 2019; 9: 17109. google scholar
• 19. Jamal M, Ahmad W, Andleeb S, Jalil F, Imran M, Nawaz MA, et al. Bacterial biofilm and associated infections. JCMA 2018; 81(1): 7-11. google scholar
• 20. Onbas T, Osmanagaoglu O, Kiran F. Potential properties of Lacto-bacillus plantarum F-10 as a bio-control strategy for wound infec-tions. Probiotics Antimicro 2019; 11(4): 1110- 23. google scholar
• 21. Garcia-Contreras R, Nunez-Lopez L, Jasso-Chavez R. Quorum sens-ing enhancement of the stress response promotes resistance to quorum quenching and prevents social cheating. ISME J 2015; 9(1): 115-25. google scholar
• 22. Kim NN, Kim WJ, Kang SSJFC. Antibiofilm effect of crude bacterio-cin derived from Lactobacillus brevis DF01 on Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Food Control 2019; 98: 274-80. google scholar
• 23. Kaur S, Sharma P, Kalia N, Singh J, Kaur S. Antibiofilm properties of the fecal probiotic lactobacilli against vibrio spp. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018; 8: 120. google scholar
• 24. Iannitti T, Palmieri B. Therapeutical use of probiotic formulations in clinical practice. Clin Nutr 2010; 29(6): 701-25. google scholar
• 25. Shokri D, Khorasgani MR, Mohkam M, Fatemi SM, Ghasemi Y, Ta-heri-Kafrani A. The inhibition effect of lactobacilli against growth and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Probiotics An-timicrobe Proteins 2018; 10(1): 34-42. google scholar
• 26. Lee D, Kim BS, Kang SS. Bacteriocin of Pediococcus acidilactici HW01 inhibits biofilm formation and virulence factor production by Pseu-domonas aeruginosa. Probiotics Antimicro 2020; 12(1): 73-81. google scholar
• 27. Wasfi R, Abd El-Rahman OA, Zafer MM, Ashour HM. Probiotic Lac-tobacillus sp. inhibit growth, biofilm formation and gene expres-sion of caries-inducing Streptococcus mutans. J Cell Mol Med 2018; 22(3): 1972-83. google scholar
• 28. James KM, MacDonald KW, Chanyi RM, Cadieux PA, Burton JP. In-hibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation and modulation of gene expression by probiotic cells and supernatant. J Med Micro-biol 2016; 65(4): 328-36. google scholar
• 29. Kiymaci ME, Altanlar N, Gumustas M, Ozkan SA, Akin A. Quorum sensing signals and related virulence inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a potential probiotic strain’s organic acid. Microb Pathog 2018; 121: 190-7. google scholar
• 30. Gömez NC, Ramiro JM, Quecan BX, de Melo Franco BD. Use of po-tential probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) biofilms for the control of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhimurium, and Escherich-ia coli O157: H7 biofilms formation. Front Microbiol 2016; 7: 863. google scholar
• 31. Qichuang Li, Yonglong Pan, Linxian Ding, Huachang Hong, Shuxia Yan, Binbin Wu, et al. draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus bre-vis Strain 3M004, a probiotic with potential quorum-sensing regu-lation. Genome Announc 2017; 5(36): e00675-17. google scholar
• 32. Merghni A, Dallel I, Noumi E. Antioxidant and antiproliferative po-tential of biosurfactants isolated from Lactobacillus casei and their antibiofilm effect in oral Staphylococcus aureus strains. Microb Pat-hog 2017; 104: 84-9. google scholar
• 33. Yan X, Gu S, Cui X. Antimicrobial, anti-adhesive and antibiofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from Pediococcus acidilac-tici and Lactobacillus plantarum against Staphylococcus aureus CMCC26003. Microb Pathog 2019; 127: 12-20. google scholar
• 34. Rana S, Bhawal S, Kumari A, Kapila S, Kapila R. pH-dependent inhi-bition of AHL-mediated quorum sensing by cell-free supernatant of lactic acid bacteria in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microb Pathog 2020; 28; 142: 104105. google scholar
• 35. Sturme MHJ, Francke C, Siezen RJ, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. Making sense of quorum sensing in lactobacilli: a special focus on Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Microbiology 2007; 153: 3939-47. google scholar
• 36. Yılmaz-Yıldıran H, Karahan AG, Başyiğit-Kılıç G. Quorum sensing mechanism in lactic acid bacteria. Turk J Hygiene Exper Bio 2015; 72(1): 79-90. google scholar
• 37. Tabasco R, de Palencia PF, Fontecha Pelaez C, Requena T. Compe-tition mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria: fer-mentative metabolism and colonization. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2014; 55: 680-4. google scholar
• 38. Aldunate M, Srbinovski D, Hearps AC, Latham CF, Ramsland PA, Gu-gasyan R, Cone RA, Tachedjian G. Antimicrobial and immune mod-ulatory effects of lactic acid and short chain fatty acids produced by vaginal microbiota associated with eubiosis and bacterial vagi-nosis. Front Physiol 2015; 6: 164. google scholar