Radiomorfometric Analysis of Dental and Trabeculae Bone Changes in Bruxism Patients

Purpose: The aim of the study is to analyze the changes detected in panoramic radiographs due to bruxism with qualitative and quantitative scales. Materials & Methods: 173 panoramic radiographs of 93 healthy and 80 bruxist individuals were included. Maxillary and mandibular teeth were classified as anterior and posterior on radiographs; loss of the lamina dura (LD), widening of the periodontal ligament (PDL) space, attrition, presence of pulp stones, and pulpal sclerosis were scored. Fractal dimension (FD) analyses were calculated in 10 regions of interest (ROI) including bilateral condylar region, gonial region, ramus, apical areas between the 1st molar -2nd premolar, and the 1st premolar and the canine. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, independent sample t-test, Kruskal–Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests. Results: 98 women and 75 men were included. There was no statistically significant difference between the genders (p>0.05). The incidence of LD loss, widening of the PDL space, attrition, and pulpal sclerosis was significantly higher in bruxist patients than in the control group (p<0.001). The incidence of widening of the PDL space (p=0.004), pulpal sclerosis (p<0.001), and the presence of pulp stones (p<0.001) were significantly higher in the posterior regions. The mean FD of the condyle was 1.18 ±0.16 in the healthy group and 1.20 ±0.11 in the bruxist group. Conclusion: The incidence of LD loss, widening of the PDL space, attrition, and pulpal sclerosis is higher in bruxists. FD didn’t demonstrate significant differences in the mandibular trabecular structures of bruxist and healthy individuals.

Keywords:

Bruxism, clenching, fractal dimension. panoramic radiograph, radiomorphometric analysis,

PDF

___

References: 1. Murali RV, Priyadarshni R, and Anjana M. Bruxism: Conceptual discussion and review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015; 7: 265.
2. Koyano K, Tsukiyama Y, Ichiki R, Kuwata T. Assessment of bruxism in the clinic. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35(7): 495-508.
3. Gulec M, Tassoker M, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Evaluation of the mandibular trabecular bone in patients with bruxism using fractal analysis. Oral Radiol 2021: 37(1): 36-45.
4. Veiga N, Angelo T, Ribeiro O, Baptista A. Bruxism–literature review. IJDOH 2015; 15(5).
5. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bruxism and dental implants: A meta-analysis. Implant Dent 2015; 24(5): 505-516.
6. Türp JC, Simonek M, Dagassan D. Bone apposition at the mandibular angles as a radiological sign of bruxism: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 2021; 21(1): 1-5.
7. Eninanç İ, Yeler DY, Çınar Z. Investigation of mandibular fractal dimension on digital panoramic radiographs in bruxist individuals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021; 131(5): 600-609.
8. Palinkas M, De Luca Canto G, Rodrigues LAM, Bataglion C, Siéssere S, et al. Comparative capabilities of clinical assessment, diagnostic criteria, and polysomnography in detecting sleep bruxism. J Clin Sleep Med 2015; 11(11): 1319-1325.
9. Kato CN, Barra SG, Tavares NP, Amaral TM, Brasileiro CB, et al. Use of fractal analysis in dental images: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2020; 49(2): 20180457.
10. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International classification of sleep disorders, revised: Diagnostic and coding manual. Chicago, Illinois: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2001.
11. White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999: 88; 628-35.
12. Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ. Assessment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 123(3): 382-391
13. Nishigawa K, Bando E, Nakano M. Quantitative study of bite force during sleep associated bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28(5): 485-491.
14. Ispas, A, Crăciun A, Kui A, Lascu L, Constantiniuc M. Effects of occlusal trauma on the periodontium, alveolar bone, temporomandibular joint and central nervous system. Hum Vet Med 2018; 10(3); 158-162.
15. Fan J, Caton JG. Occlusal trauma and excessive occlusal forces: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol, 2018; 89: 214-S222.
16. Beddis H, Pemberton M, Davies S. Sleep bruxism: an overview for clinicians. Br Dent J 2018; 225(6): 497-501.
17. Kapagiannidou D, Koutris M, Wetselaar P, Visscher CM, van der Zaag J, et al. Association between polysomnographic parameters of sleep bruxism and attrition-type tooth wear. J Oral Rehabil 2021; 48(6): 687-691.
18. Wetselaar P, Lobbezoo F. The tooth wear evaluation system: a modular clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management planning of worn dentitions. J Oral Rehabil 2016; 43(1): 69-80.
19. Tassoker M. Evaluation of the relationship between sleep bruxism and pulpal calcifications in young women: A clinico-radiological study. Imaging Sci Dent 2018; 48(4): 277-281.
20. Lam EWN. Dental Anomalies. White SC and Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. Missouri, USA. Elsevier. 2014. p. 607-608.
21. Kumagai H, Suzuki T, Hamada T, Sondang P, Fujitani M, et al. Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26(12): 932-935.
22. Kolcakoglu K, Amuk M, Sirin Sarıbal G. Evaluation of mandibular trabecular bone by fractal analysis on panoramic radiograph in paediatric patients with sleep bruxism. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Feb 7.
23. Yasar F, Akgünlü F. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34(5): 261-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/85149245.
24. Coşgunarslan A, Soydan Çabuk D, Canger EM. Effect of total edentulism on the internal bone structure of mandibular condyle: a preliminary study. Oral Radiol 2021; 37(2): 268-275.