Comparison of Primary Stability of Sinus Implants and Standart Implants
Comparison of Primary Stability of Sinus Implants and Standart Implants
Abstract
Background
The BoneTrust® Sinus implant (BTSI) enables optimal primary stability by its special design with reduced thread section in
cases of reduced vertical bone availability, thus allowing in many cases a one-step operative procedure even if less than 5mm
of the bone level is available in the sinus region. The aim of this in vitro study was to analyze the primary stability of BoneTrust®
Sinus implant in comparison with standart implants.
In the years 2015-2017, partially edentulous patients were consecutively provided with implant-supported fixed restorations
with the use of 11 BoneTrust® Sinus implants of the Medical Instinct® System (Medical Instinct Production GmbH, Bovenden,
Germany) (Group A) and the 11 standard OXY implants of Biomec System (Biomec system Italy) (Group B) at Baskent University,
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.In this study, measurements were conducted with the Resonance Frequency
Analysis method by using Osstell device on 11 BoneTrust® Sinus implants of the Medical Instinct® System (Medical Instinct
Production GmbH, Bovenden, Germany) and 11 standart OXY implants of Biomec System (Biomec system Italy).
Results
Primary and secondary ISQ values implants were compared and there was no statistically significant difference between these
two groups in terms of these parameters.No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of bone loss
after 6 months.
Conclusion
This present study did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference, between the primary and 6th-month ISQ values of
the standard implants group and sinus implants group.
___
- 1. Morand M, Irinakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in
theposterior maxilla: providing a rationale for the use of
short implants.J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:257–266
- 2. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, et al. Qualitative and
Altıparmak N. et al. 14-20 Page 20 Eurasia J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019 Dec;1(1):
quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-yearretrospective analysis of the brånemark implant. Int
J Oral MaxillofacImplants.1997;12:504–514
- 3. Yun-Ho K, Na-Rae C, Yong-Deok K. The factors that
influence postoperative stability of the dental implants
inposterior edentulous maxilla. Maxillofacial Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery 2017; 39:2
- 4. Stefan L, Johannes YL, Detlef A, et al. Influence of Implant
Geometry on Primary Insertion Stability and Simulated
Peri-implant Bone Loss:An In Vitro Study Using Resonance
FrequencyAnalysis and Damping Capacity Assessment.Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:347-55.
- 5. Lachmann S, Jager B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, et al.
Resonance frequency analysis and dampening capacity
assessment. Part 1: an in vitro study on measurement
reliability and a method of comparison in the determination
of primary implant stability. Clinical Oral Implants
Research. 2006;17:75–79.
- 6. Aydin G, Mustafa A, Hakan G, et al. A. In vitro assessment
of primary stability of Bone trust® sinus implant design:
An in-vitro study. International Journal of Periodontics &
Restorative Dentistry. 2016;36:731-735.
7. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success,
survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral
Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference.
Implant Dent 2008;17:5-15.
- 8. Kutsuyama H, Jensen SS, Chen S, et al. Treatment options
for sinus floor elevation. In: ITI treatment guide volume 5:
Sinus floor elevation procedures. Chicago: Quintessence
Publishing Co. Ltd 2011:33-57.
- 9. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor
with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;
38:613-616.
- 10. Soydan SS, Cubuk S, Bayrak B et al. Comparative
evaluation of simultaneous maxillary sinus floor elevation
and implant placement with residual bone heights greater
or less than 5 mm. International Journal of Oral Maxillofac
Implants. 2015;30:179-83.
- 11. Solar P, Geyerhofer U, Traxler H, et al. Blood supplyto
the maxillary sinus relevant to sinus floor elevation
procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:34-44.
- 12. Vercellotti T. Technological characteristics and clinical
indications of piezoelectricbone surgery. Minerva
Stomatol. 2004;5:207-214
- 13. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, et al. Resonance frequency
measurements of implant stability in vivo. A crosssectional
and longitudinal study of resonance frequency
measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially
dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants. 1997;8:226–233.
- 14. Herrero-Climent M, Albertini M, Rios-Santos JV, et
al. Resonance frequency analysis-reliability in third
generation instruments: Osstell mentor®. Med Oral Patol
Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:801–806.