Using Inquiry-Based Laboratory Instruction to Improve Critical Thinking and Scientific Process Skills among Preservice Elementary Teachers
Using Inquiry-Based Laboratory Instruction to Improve Critical Thinking and Scientific Process Skills among Preservice Elementary Teachers
Purpose: Although critical thinking skills (CTS) andscientific process skills (SPS) are the beneficial skillsneeded in the 21 st century learning, the fact is that theacquisition of these two skills is still low. Researchwith a focus on improving these skills by using inquiry-based approach is also limited. Therefore, this quasi-experimental study aimed to enhance preservice elementary teachers’ CTS and SPS by using Inquiry-Based Laboratory Instruction (IBLI). Method: A pretest-posttest control group design wasexecuted. A total of 43 students who attendedTeaching Science in Elementary School-II LaboratoryCourse at the Muhammadiyah University of Ponorogo were divided into two groups usingcluster random sampling. The experimental group (n=21) was taught by using IBLI, while thecontrol group (n=22) was taught by using traditional laboratory method. The Oliver-HoyoRubric for Critical Thinking (OHRCT) and the Observation Checklist for SPS (OCSPS) wereadministered. The data were then analyzed by using normalized gain score and Mann-Whitney U test at significance level .05.Findings: There was a significant difference in terms of CTS and SPS between control andexperimental groups in favor of experimental group students. It was found out that gainedCTS score of control and experimental group students was .58 and .80, while gained SPS scorewas .60 and .81, respectively. It can be highlighted that IBLI had a significant effect onpreservice elementary teachers’ performance compared to the conventional group.Implications for Research and Practice: The findings suggest that IBLI is considered as theeffective method to foster CTS and SPS of preservice elementary teachers. According to results,it is recommended that preservice teachers need to be given opportunities to develop hands-on and minds-on experiences in the science laboratory activities. The lecturers should utilizeIBLI to develop students’ various lifelong learning skills.
___
- Abdullah, S., & Shariff, A. (2008). The effects of inquiry-based computer simulation
with cooperative learning on scientific thinking and conceptual understanding
of gas laws. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(4),
387–398.
- Ahrari, S., Samah, B. A., Hassan, M. S., Wahat, N. W., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2016).
Deepening critical thinking skills through civic engagement in Malaysian higher
education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 121–128.
- Akben, N. (2015). Improving science process skills in science and technology course
activities using the inquiry method. Education and Science, 40(179), 111–132.
- Akınoglu, O., & Tandoğan, R. Ö. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning
in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept
learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 71–
81.
- Aktas, G. S., & Ünlü, M. (2013). Critical thinking skills of teacher candidates of
elementary mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 831–835.
- Allen, M. (2008). Promoting critical thinking skills in online ınformation literacy ınstruction using a constructivist approach. College & Undergraduate Libraries,
15(1-2), 21–38.
- Arabacioglu, S., & Unver, A. O. (2016). Supporting inquiry based with mobile learning
to enhance students’ process skills in science education. Journal of Baltic Science
Education, 15(2), 216–231.
- Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2016). The effectiveness of the
three levels of inquiry in improving teacher training students’ science process
skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 908–919.
- Avsec, S., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). The effect of the use of an inquiry-based approach in
an open learning middle school hydraulic turbine optimisation course. World
Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 12(3), 329–337.
- Aydogdu, B. (2017). A study on basic process skills of Turkish primary school students.
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 67, 51–69.
- Azar, A. (2010). The effect of critical thinking dispositions on students achievement in
selection and placement exam for university in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science
Education, 7(1), 61–73.
- Baser, M., & Durmuş, S. (2010). The effectiveness of computer supported versus real
laboratory inquiry learning environments on the understanding of direct current
electricity among pre-service elementary school teachers. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 47–61.
- Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
California: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Boa, E. A., Wattanatorn, A., & Tagong, K. (2018). The development and validation of
the blended socratic method of teaching (BSMT): An instructional model to
enhance critical thinking skills of undergraduate business students. Kasetsart
Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 81–89.
- Brahler, C. J., Quitadamo, I. J., & Johnson, E. C. (2002). Student critical thinking is
enhanced by developing exercise prescriptions using online learning modules.
Advances in Physiology Education, 26(3), 210–221.
- Budsankom, P., Sawangboon, T., Damrongpanit, S., & Chuensirimongkol, J. (2015).
Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic
structural equation modeling study. Educational Research and Review, 10(19),
2639–2652.
- Canziani, B., & Tullar, W. L. (2017). Developing critical thinking through student
consulting projects. Journal of Education for Business, 92(6), 271–279.
- Casem, M. L. (2006). Student perspectives on curricular change: Lessons from an
undergraduate lower-division biology core. CBE - Life Science Education, 5, 65–
75.
- Chairam, S., Klahan, N., & Coll, R. K. (2015). Exploring secondary students’
understanding of chemical kinetics through inquiry-based learning activities.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 937–956.
- Chairam, S., Somsook, E., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Enhancing Thai students’ learning of
chemical kinetics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(1), 95–115.
- Chiappetta, E. L. (1997). Inquiry-based science: Strategies and techniques for
encouraging inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher, 64(7), 22–26.
- Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Darus, F. B., & Saat, R. M. (2014). How do primary school students acquire the skill of
making hypothesis. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 2(2), 20–
26.
- Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry
in laboratory instruction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(1), 267–283.
- Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on
student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908.
- Ekahitanond, V. (2013). Promoting university students’ critical thinking skills through
peer feedback activity in an online discussion forum. Alberta Journal of
Educational Research, 59(2), 247–265.
- Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking
dispositions.
Retrieved
from
http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureof
CriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf
- Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA:
Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press.
- Feyzioglu, B., Demirdağ, B., Akyıldız, M., & Altun, E. (2012). Developing a science
process skills test for secondary students: Validity and reliability study.
Educational Science Theory and Practice, 12(3), 1899–1906.
- Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research
in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Gehring, K. M., & Eastman, D. A. (2008). Information fluency for undergraduate
biology majors: Applications of inquiry-based learning in a developmental
biology course. CBE Life Sciences Education, 7, 54–63.
- Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2008). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh (Analyzing
and understanding data). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Greenwald, R. R., & Quitadamo, I. J. (2014). A mind of their own: Using inquiry-based
teaching to build critical thinking skills and intellectual engagement in an
undergraduate neuroanatomy course. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience
Education, 12(2), A100–A106.
- Gultepe, N., & Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development
of scientific process skills in the context of teaching chemistry. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 111–132.
- Gupta, T., Burke, K. A., Mehta, A., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2015). Impact of guided-
inquiry-based instruction with a writing and reflection emphasis on chemistry
students’ critical thinking abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 32–38.
- Hake,
R.
R.
(1999).
Analyzing
change/gain
scores.
Retrieved from
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf
- Hardianti, T., & Kuswanto, H. (2017). Difference among levels of inquiry: Process skills
improvement at senior high school in Indonesia. International Journal of
Instruction, 10(2), 119–130.
- Hsiao, H.-S., Chen, J.-C., Hong, J.-C., Chen, P.-H., Lu, C.-C., & Chen, S. Y. (2017). A
five-stage prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model to
improve students’ learning performance in science courses. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3393–3416.
- Hugerat, M., & Kortam, N. (2014). Improving higher order thinking skills among
freshmen by teaching science through inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 447–454.
- Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018a). A survey analysis of pre-service
chemistry teachers’ critical thinking skills. MIER Journal of Educational Studies,
Trends & Practices, 8(1), 57–73.
- Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018b). Undergraduate students’ science
process skills in terms of some variables: A perspective from Indonesia. Journal
of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 751–764.
- Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018c). The investigation of university
students’ science process skills and chemistry attitudes at the laboratory course.
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(2), [7].
- Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (in press). Analyzing the relationships
between pre-service chemistry teachers’ science process skills and critical
thinking skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education.
- Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., Widjajanti, E., & Suyanta. (2017a). Students’ science process skill
and analytical thinking ability in chemistry learning. In AIP Conference
Proceedings (Vol. 1868, pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995100.
- Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., Widjajanti, E., & Suyanta. (2017b). The development of an
integrated assessment instrument for measuring analytical thinking and science
process skills. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1847, pp. 1–6).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983907.
- Irwanto, Saputro, A. D., Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Promoting critical
thinking and problem solving skills of pre-service elementary teachers through
process-oriented guided-inquiry learning (POGIL). Inte
rnational Journal of
Instruction, 11(4), 777–794.
- Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Hančová, M., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Balogová, B., & Kireš, M. (2016). Efficacy of inquiry-based learning in mathematics, physics and
informatics in relation to the development of students’ inquiry skills. Journal of
Baltic Science Education, 15(5), 559–574.
- Karsli, F., & Şahin, Ç. (2009). Developing worksheet based on science process skills:
Factors affecting solubility. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,
10(1), [15].
- Ketpichainarong, W., Panijpan, B., & Ruenwongsa, P. (2010). Enhanced learning of
biotechnology students by an inquiry-based cellulase laboratory. International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(2), 169–187.
- Koc, Y., Doymus, K., Karacop, A., & Simşek, Ü. (2010). The effects of two cooperative
learning strategies on the teaching and learning of the topics of chemical kinetics.
Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 52–65.
- Konur, K. B., & Yıldırım, N. (2016). Pre-service science and primary school teachers’
identification of scientific process skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research,
4(6), 1273–1281.
- Löfgren, R., Schoultz, J., Hultman, G., & Björklund, L. (2013). Exploratory talk in
science education: Inquiry-based learning and communicative approach in
primary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(4), 482–496.
- Lord, T., & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction
in a science laboratory. American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342–345.
- Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). Too much teaching, not enough learning: What is
the solution? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(1), 17–22.
- Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Bahri, A., & Dinnurriya, M. S. (2016). Improving students’
critical thinking skills through remap NHT in biology classroom. Asia-Pacific
Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), [11].
- Maxwell, D. O., Lambeth, D. T., & Cox, J. T. (2015). Effects of using inquiry-based
learning on science achievement for fifth-grade students. Asia-Pacific Forum on
Science Learning and Teaching, 16(1), [2].
- Molefe, L., Stears, M., & Hobden, S. (2016). Exploring student teachers’ views of
science process skills in their initial teacher education programmes. South African
Journal of Education, 36(3), 1–12.
- Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2016). Improving critical thinking
skills of college students through RMS model for learning basic concepts in
science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), [12].
- Mutlu, A., & Acar-Şeşen, B. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ understanding of
chemistry: A factorial design study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &
Technology Education, 14(7), 2817–2837.
- National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking [NCECT]. (2013). Critical thinking.
Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/thenational-council-
for-excellence-in-critical-thinking/406.
- Oliver-Hoyo, M. T. (2003). Designing a written assignment to promote the use of
critical thinking skills in an introductory chemistry course. Journal of Chemical
Education, 80(8), 899–903.
- Ongowo, R. O. (2017). Secondary school students’ mastery of integrated science
process skills in Siaya county, Kenya. Creative Education, 8, 1941–1956.
- Osman, K., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). Fostering science process skills and improving
achievement through the use of multiple media. Journal of Baltic Science
Education, 12(2), 191–204.
- Ozdem-Yilmaz, Y., & Cavas, B. (2016). Pedagogically desirable science education:
Views on inquiry-based science education in Turkey. Journal of Baltic Science
Education, 15(4), 506–522.
- Ozgür, S. D., & Yilmaz, A. (2017). The effect of inquiry-based learning on gifted and
talented students’ understanding of acids-bases concepts and motivation.
Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 994–1008.
- Padilla, M. J. (1990). Science process skills. National association of research in science
teaching publication: Research matters - to the science teacher (9004). Retrieved
from http://www.narst.org/publications/research/skill.cfm.
- Pradina, L. P., & Suyatna, A. (2018). Atom core interactive electronic book to develop
self efficacy and critical thinking skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology, 17(1), 17–23.
- Quitadamo, I. J., Faiola, C. L., Johnson, J. E., & Kurtz, M. J. (2008). Community-based
inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology. CBE Life Sciences
Education, 7, 327–337.
- Rissing, S. W., & Cogan, J. G. (2009). Can an inquiry approach improve college student
learning in a teaching laboratory? CBE Life Sciences Education, 8, 55–61.
- Sağlam, M. K., & Şahin, M. (2017). Inquiry-based Professional Development Practices
for Science Teachers. Inquiry-Based Professional Development Practices for Science
Teachers, 14(4), 66–76.
- Sari, S. A., Jasmidi, Kembaren, A., & Sudrajat, A. (2018). The impacts of chemopoly-
edutainment to learning activities and responses. Journal of Education and
Learning, 12(2), 311–318.
- Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (1987). Defining critical thinking. In The 8th Annual International
Conference on Critical Thinking and Education Reform. Retrieved from
http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
- Sen, C., & Vekli, G. S. (2016). The impact of inquiry based instruction on science process
skills and self-efficacy perceptions of pre-service science teachers at a university
level biology laboratory. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 603–612.
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-
experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin
Company.
- Škoda, J., Doulík, P., Bílek, M., & Šimonová, I. (2015). The effectiveness of inquiry based
science education in relation to the learners’ motivation types. Journal of Baltic
Science Education, 14(6), 791–803.
- Tatar, N. (2012). Inquiry-based science laboratories: An analysis of preservice teachers’
beliefs about learning science through inquiry and their performances. Journal of
Baltic Science Education, 11(3), 248–267.
- Wang, C.-H. (1993). Improving chemistry experimental learning through process-
mapping-hydrolysis of p-nitroacetanilide-. Bull. Nat’l Taiwan Nor. Univ., 38, 157–
173.
- Wartono, W., Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2018). How are the physics critical
thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through
empirical and theorethical overview? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education, 14(2), 691–697.
- Yakar, Z., & Baykara, H. (2014). Inquiry-based laboratory practices in a science teacher
training program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education, 10(2), 173–183.
- Yang, H., & Park, J. (2017). Identifying and applying factors considered important in
students’ experimental design in scientific open inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science
Education, 16(6), 932–945.
- Žoldošová, K., & Matejovičová, I. (2010). Finding out how the elementary school
children manipulate with empirical material and how they process the obtained
information. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 327–347.