Kristayulita KRISTAYULITA, Toto NUSANTARA, Abdur Rahman AS’ARI, Cholis SA’DIJAH

Schema of Analogical Reasoning - Thinking Process in Example Analogies Problem

Purpose: Analogical reasoning has been studiedusing a variety of tasks that generally requiredconsideration of the relationship between the objectand its integration to conclude an analog schema. Theaim of this study was to describe the model ofanalogical reasoning schema based on someanalogical problems.Research Method: In this study used a qualitativeresearch approach with design research is the casestudy. Data were taken from 16-year-old high schoolstudents, West Nusa Tenggara Indonesia. Theresearcher selected 4 students who answered twoanalogical problems correctly and used in analyzingqualitative data. Findings: The findings showed that there is a difference in the schema. The first type is thatstudents can directly map between target problem and source problem, followed bystructuring, applying, and verifying. The second type is that the student can not directly mapbetween the target problem with the source problem, but the student needs to do arepresentation of the target problem so as to find a form of problem that has similarities withthe source problem. Then the student can map between target problem with source problem,followed by doing the process as the first schema type.The Implication for Research and Practice: Findings of this study may have an impact on theway teachers teach mathematics on the analogical problems they use. Teachers can considermathematical problems used in learning so that students easily understand the theory fromthe concepts being taught. And then, teachers need to develop an analogical problem that candevelop critical and creative thinking to enhance the creativity of high school students withtheir analogical reasoning

PDF

___

Amir-Mofidi, S., Amiripour, P., & Bijan-Zadeh, M. H. (2012). Instruction of mathematical concepts through analogical reasoning skills. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6), 2916–2922. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2012/v5i6.12
Assmus, D., Forster, F., & Fritzlar, T. (2014). Analogizing during mathematical problem solving-theoretical and empirical considerations. In Proceeding of the Joint Meeting of PME (Vol. 38, pp. 73–80). Retrieved from https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1620514/285455/PME38- 2014%20Vancouver%202.pdf#page=83
Bassok, M. (2001). Semantic alignments in mathematical word problems. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, 401–433.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2001). Analogical Problem Construction and Transfer in Mathematical Problem Solving. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 137–150. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020043841
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=EbogAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd& pg=PP1&dq=Reseach+Design:+Qualitative,+Quantitative,+and+Mixed+Meth ods+Approaches.&ots=cbaQvRMzE3&sig=noU93mpCThgY41T49ShXjBVvou o
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263–287. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GCqRAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd &pg=PP1&dq=Mathematical+and+analogical+reasoning+of+young+learners &ots=oXoAt3Ad_U&sig=DVbtiQwggdS6COnnz916j6iqZF4
Eveleth, D. M. (2016). Analogical reasoning: When a non-expert reasons like an expert. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 1(1), 28-40. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ca d=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjk55T9jvTqAhWZFzQIHa2rDegQFjANegQIBh AB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fjbam.scholasticahq.com%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fattachm ents%2F1959%2Fdownload&usg=AOvVaw31bXCwTjRSPP7Z6UUOiPWj
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709c0g0702_3
Gentner, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Reasoning and learning by analogy: Introduction. American Psychologist, 52, 32–34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.52.1.32
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.). (2001). The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J. (2002). Relational language and relational thought. Amsel, Eric (Ed); Byrnes, James P. (Ed). Language, Literacy, and Cognitive Development: The Development and Consequences of Symbolic Communication, 87–120, Erlbaum. Retrieved from https://loewenstein.web.illinois.edu/papers/GentnerLoewenstein02.pdf
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.52.1.45
Gust, H., Krumnack, U., Kühnberger, K.-U., & Schwering, A. (2008). Analogical Reasoning: A Core of Cognition. KI, 22(1), 8–12. Retrieved from http://schwering.staff.ifgi.de/gust_KIThemenheft.pdf
Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2001). Toward an understanding of analogy within a biological symbol system. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (161–195). The MIT Press.
Krawczyk, D. C. (2012). The cognition and neuroscience of relational reasoning. Brain Research, 1428, 13–23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.080
Kristayulita, K., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2018). Identification of Students Errors in Solving Indirect Analogical Problems Based on Analogical Reasoning Components. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012154. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012154
Magdas, I. (2015). Analogical Reasoning in Geometry Education. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(1), 57–65. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1064450.pdf
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2000). Structure mapping in the comparison process. The American Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 501. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/1423470
Saleh, K., Yuwono, I., As’ ari, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2017). Errors analysis solving problems analogies by Newman procedure using analogical reasoning. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 17-26. Retrieved from https://ijhss.net/index.php/ijhss/article/view/253/89
Thagard, P. (2005). Mind: introduction to cognitive science (2nd ed). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Trench, M., Oberholzer, N., & Minervino, R. (2009). Dissolving the analogical paradox: Retrieval under a production paradigm is highly constrained by superficial similarity. New Frontiers in Analogy Research, 443–452. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215991952_Dissolving_the_analo gical_paradox_retrieval_under_a_production_paradigm_is_highly_constraine d_by_superficial_similarity/link/0deec5263081c8c74f000000/download
Voskoglou, M. G. (2012). Mathematizing the Process of Analogical Reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(7), 58–69. Retrieved from https://proxy.furb.br/ojs/index.php/modelling/article/view/2836/2204