Evaluation of the Problems Encountered in Public Education Centers

Evaluation of the Problems Encountered in Public Education Centers

Purpose: Public Education Centers are important educational institutions where the knowledge and skills that the adults need are gained. The purpose of this research is to determine the problems encountered in Public Education Centers. Research Methods: A qualitative research method has been used in this research. The working group of the study is composed of 20 teachers, 46 qualified instructors and 45 trainees who attended courses in Diyarbakır Public Education Centers during the 2016–2017 academic year. The data of the study were collected by a semi-structured interview technique among the interview technique types. Descriptive and content analysis techniques were used in the analysis of the data obtained from the interview. Findings: According to research findings, the teachers, the qualified instructors and the trainees stated that they had problems due to a "material shortage" in Public Education Centers in general. It was observed that the teachers faced problems related to trainees who registered for the courses but did not come to class regularly and a lack of guidance services. The fact that the qualified instructors are required to work for additional tuition fees without a permanent staff position and that they have problems in finding trainees for courses are among the problems mentioned in the research findings. Implications for Research and Practice: The findings of the research show that there is a material shortage in Public Education Centers. The budget allocated to the Public Education Centers needs to be increased to meet the materials needed in the courses.

___

  • Alabay, N. (2003). Kirikkale ilinde halk egitim merkezinde gorev yapan ogretmen ve usta ogreticilerin mezun olduklari kaynaklari ve halk egitim merkezi icerisindeki sorunlari. [Graduation sources of teachers and qualified instructors serving in public education center in kirikkale and their problems in public education center] (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi University. Ankara.
  • Asir, S.K. (2011). Mamak halk egitim merkezinde acilan kurslara katilan kadinlarin egitim egitime katilma ve terk nedenleri. [The reasons for the participation and abandonment of the female trainees in the courses opened at mamak public education center] (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Ankara University. Ankara.
  • Ata, E. (2016). Baskent halk egitim merkezindeki mesleki kurslara yetiskinlerin katilim oruntuleri. [Adult participation patterns in vocational courses in the baskent public education center]. (Unpublished master thesis). Ankara University. Ankara.
  • Bilir, M. (2004). Kentlesme sürecinde yetiskinlerin egitim gereksinimi: Ankara mamak ilcesi, tuzlucayır semti, ege mahallesi ornegi. [Training needs of adults in urbanization process: Ankara mamak district, tuzlucayır district, ege neighborhood sample]. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 98-121.
  • Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E K.., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Yayincilik.
  • Celep, C. (2003). Halk egitimi. [Public education]. Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
  • Cercone, K. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning Design. AACE Journal, 16(2), 137-159.
  • Christensen, L.B., Johnson, R.B., & Turner, L.A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis. Ahmet Aypay (Translated). Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
  • Edwars, R. & Usher, R. (2001).Lifelong learning: A postmodern condition of education?American Association for Adult and Continuing Education, 51(4), 273-287.
  • Ekiz, D. (2009). Bilimsel arastirma yöntemleri. [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
  • Elustu, A. (2007). Yetiskinlerin egitim ihtiyaclari ve halk egitimi ile ilgili farkindalik duzeylerinin belirlenmesi. [Determination of education needs and awareness level of the adults for public education]. (Unpublished master thesis). Marmara University. Istanbul.
  • Geray, C. (1978). Halk egitimi. [Public education]. Ankara: Ankara Universitesi.
  • Gunes, F. (1996). Yetiskin egitimi (Halk egitimi). [Adult education (Public education)].Ankara: Ocak Yayinlari.
  • Guven, I. (2015). Turk egitim tarihi. [History of Turkish education]. Ankara: Pegem Yayincilik.
  • Kaya, E. (2015). Turkiye’de halk egitimi merkezleri. [Public education centers in Turkey]. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport (IntJSCS), 3, 268-277.
  • Kiziltepe, Z. (2015). Icerik analizi. Nitel arastırma yontem, teknik, analiz ve yaklasimlari [Content analysis. Qualitative research method, technique, analysis and approaches.] F. N. Seggie & Y.Bayyurt (Ed.). Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
  • Knowles, M. (1996). Adult earners: A neglected species. (S .Ayhan Translated). Ankara: Ankara University.
  • Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2015). Adult education. Okhan Gunduz (Translated). Istanbul: Kaknus Yayinlari.
  • Kurt, I. (2014). Yetiskin egitimi. [Adult education]. Ankara: Akçag Yayinlari.
  • MNE (2010). Yaygin egitim kurumlari yonetmeligi. [Regulation on non - formal education institutions]. Official Newspaper.
  • MNE (2011). Halk egitimi faaliyetlerinin uygulanmasina dair yonerge (2645 Sayili). [Guideline on the implementation of public education activities (No. 2645)]. Magazine of papers, 74.
  • Merriam, S.B. (2013). A guide for qualitative research design and implementation (S. Turan Translated). Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand oaks,CA: Sage.
  • Miser, R. (2013). Training of local communities. In A. Yıldız & M. Uysal (Ed.), Adult education (pp. 273-285). Istanbul: Kalkedon Yayinlari.
  • Okcabol, R. (2006). Halk egitimi. [Public education]. Ankara: Utopya Yayinlari.
  • Patton, M.Q.(2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand oaks, calif: Sage.
  • Robson, C. (2015). Real world research. (S. Cinkir & N. D. Kasimoglu Translated). Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
  • Rith, E. (2008). Redefining tradition: adult learners and higher education. Adult Learning, 19(1-2), 12-16.
  • Smith, C.S. (2010). The great dilemma of improving teacher quality in adult learning and literacy. Adult Basic Education and Literacy. 4(2), 67.
  • Tanir, M. (2006). Turkiye’de halk egitim hizmetlerinin yonetimi ve halk egitim merkezlerinin etkiligi uzerine alan arastirmasi. [A survey on the management of public education services and the impact of public education centers in Turkey]. (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi Universitesi. Ankara.
  • Tasdemirci, E. (2010). Türk egitim tarihi. [History of turkish education]. Ankara: Gunduz Yayincilik.
  • Temiz, M. (2009). Halk egitim merkezlerinde gorevli mesleki - teknik ve sosyal- kulturelkurslari ogretmenlerinin oz yeterlilik duzeylerinin incelenmesi. [Examination of self-sufficiency levels of teachers at vocational-technical and social-cultural courses in public training centers]. (Unpublished master thesis). Marmara Universitesi. Istanbul.
  • Tezcan, F. (2012). Halk egitimi merkezi kurslarina katilan yetiksin ogrenenlerin guduselyonelimleri (Mugla ili merkez ilce halk egitimi merkezi kurslar ornegi). [Motivational orientations of adult learners participating in public education center courses (Mugla provincial center for public education courses)]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Ankara Universitesi. Ankara.
  • Turkoglu, A., & Uca, S. (2011). Turkiye’de halk egitimi: tarihsel gelisimi, sorunlari ve cozum onerileri. [Public education in Turkey: historical development, problems and solution suggestions]. Adnan Menderes Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2, 48-62.
  • Ural, O. (2013). Yetiskin egitiminde program alanlari. In A. Yildiz & M.Uysal (Ed.), Adult education (pp. 177-198)]. Istanbul: Kalkedon Yayinlari.
  • Yancar, M. (2014). Halk egitim merkezlerinde duzenlenen mesleki ve teknik kurslara devam eden yetiskinlerin bu kurslari tercih etme nedenleri ve kursa iliskin beklentileri (Menemen ornegi). [Reasons of adults for choosing vocational and technical courses in public education centers and their expectations of the courses (Menemen's case)]. (Unpublished master thesis). Okan University. Istanbul.
  • Yayla, D. (2002). Ucretli usta ogreticilerin yetiskin egitimi acısından yeterlik duzyleri. [Qualifying levels of paid qualified instructors in terms of adult education]. (Unpublished master thesis). Ankara Universitesi. Ankara.
  • Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.