İşgörenlerin çok yönlü ve sınırsız karyer tutumları: Hizmet sektöründe bir araştırma

Bu çalışma, işgörenlerin çok yönlü ve sınırsız kariyer tutumlarını tespit etme ve bu tutumların işgörenlerin özelliklerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini belirleme amacını taşımaktadır. Araştırmanın evrenini Nevşehir ili merkezindeki dört hizmet sektöründe (turizm, finans, eğitim, sağlık) çalışanlar oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veriler anket tekniği ile toplanmış ve araştırma sonunda 308 adet kullanılabilir anket elde edilmiştir. Çok yönlü ve sınırsız kariyer boyutlarının, işgörenlerin özellikleri itibariyle farklılık göste rip göstermediğini tespit etmek amacıyla tek yönlü Anova ve bağımsız t-testi uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonunda, çok yönlü kariyerin kendi kendini yönetme boyutuna ilişkin tutumların, işgörenlerin çocuk sayısı, meslek ve gelir açısından; değerlerine göre hareket etme boyutuna ilişkin tutumların ise meslek, gelir ve işletmedeki konumu açısından farklılık gösterdiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Sınırsız kariyerin psikolojik hareketlilik boyutuna ilişkin tutumlar, işgörenlerin çalıştıkları sektör açısından farklılaşırken; fiziksel hareketlilik boyutuna ilişkin tutumlar ise,yaşları ve mesleklerine göre farklılık göstermek- tedir.

Protean and boundaryless career attitudes of employees: a study in service sector

The study is carried out to identify protean and boundaryless career attitudes of employees and determine whether the attitudes differ in terms of employees features. The universe consists of the employees in four service sectors (tourism, finance, education and health) in Nevsehir. Questionnaire technique is used in the study and 308 applicable questionnaire forms are gath- ered.In order to determine whether the attitudes of protean and boundaryless career differ in terms of employees features, one-way Anova and independent-samples t-test are used. After the analyses; while the attitudes of self- directed dimension of protean career differ in terms of number of children, occupation and income, those of values-driven dimension differ in terms of occupation, income and status Moreover, while the attitudes of psychological mobility dimension of boundaryless career differ in terms of sector, those of physical mobility dimension differ in terms of age and occupation.

___

  • Arıkan, R. (1995), Araştırma Teknikleri ve Rapor Yazma, Ankara: Tutibay Yayınları.
  • Arthur, M. (1994), “The Boundaryless Career: A New Perspective for Organizational Inquiry”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 295-306.
  • Arthur, M. B. ve D. M. Rousseau (1996), “Introducti on: The Boundaryless Career as a New Employment Principle”, Ed. M. B. Arthur ve D. M. Rousseau, The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, New York: Oxford University, 3-20
  • Arthur, M. B., D. T Hall ve B. C. Lawrence (1989), “Generating New Directions in Career Theory: The Case for A Transdisciplinary Approach”, Ed. M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall ve B.C. Lawrence, The Handbook of Career Theory, New York: Cambridge University, 7-25
  • Arthur, M. B., K. Inkson, ve J. K. Pringle (1999), The New Careers: Individual Action and Economic Change, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Baruch Y. ve E. Rosenstein (1992), “Human Resource Management in Israeli Firms:Planning and Managing Careers in High-Technology Or ganizations”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(3), 477-495
  • Baruch, Y. (2006), “Career Development in Organizations and Beyond: Balancing Traditional and Contemporary Viewpoints”, Human Resource Management Review 16, 125–138
  • Briscoe, J. P. ve D. T. Hall (2006a), “Special Section on Boundaryless and Protean Careers: Next Steps in Conceptualizing and Measuring Boundaryless and Protean Careers”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 1–3.
  • Briscoe, J. P. ve D. T. Hall (2006b), “The Interplay of Boundaryless and Protean Careers: Combinations and Implications”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 4–18.
  • Briscoe, J. P. ve L. M. Finkelstein (2009), “The “New Career” and Organizational Commitment Do Boundaryless and Protean Attitudes Make a Difference?”, Career Development International,14(3), 242-260
  • Briscoe, J. P., D. T. Hall ve R. L. F. DeMuth (2006), “Protean and Boundaryless Careers: An Empirical Exploration”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 30–47.
  • Brislin, R.W., W. J. Lonner ve R.M. Thorndike (1973), Cross-Cultural Research Methods, New York: John Wiley &Sons Production.
  • Buelens, M. ve H. Van den Broeck (2007), “An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation Between Public and Private Sector Organizations”, Public Administration Review, 67(1), 65–74.
  • Clarke, M. (2009), “Plodders, Pragmatists, Visionaries and Opportunists: Career Patterns and Employability”, Career Development International,14(1), 8-28 Crant, J. M.(2000), “Proactive Behavior in Organizations”, Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462
  • Currie, G., S. Tempest ve K. Starkey (2006), “New Careers for Old? Organizational and Individual Responses to Changing Boundaries”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17 (4), 755-74.
  • DeFillippi, R. J. ve M. B. Arthur (1996), “Boundaryless Contexts and Careers: A Competency-Based Perspective”, Ed. M. B. Arthur ve D. M. Rousseau, The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, New York: Oxford University, 116-131
  • Eby, L. T., M. Butts ve A. Lockwood (2003), “Predictors of Success in the Era of the Boundaryless Career”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 689–708. Erdoğmuş, N. (2004), “Career Orientations of Salaried Professionals: The Case of Turkey”, Career Development International, 9(2), 153-175
  • Gunz, H., M Evans ve M. Jalland (2000), “Career Boundaries in a Boundaryless World”, Ed. M. Peiperl, M. Arthur, R. Goffee ve T. Morris, Career Frontiers: New Conceptions of Working Lives, Oxford: Oxford University, 24-53
  • Hall, D. T. ve D. E. Chandler, (2005), “Psychological Success: When the Career is A Calling”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 155–176.
  • Hall, D. T. (1996), “Protean Careers of the 21st Century”, Academy of Management Executive, 10, 8–16.
  • Hall, D. T. (2002), Careers in and out of Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hall, D. T. (2004), “The Protean Career: A Quarter-century Journey”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 1–13.
  • Hall, D. T. ve J. E. Moss, (1998), “The New Protean Career Contract: Helping Organizations and Employees Adapt”, Organizational Dynamics, 26(3), 22–37
  • Houston, D. J. (2000), “Public Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713–727.
  • Inceoglu, I., J. Segers, D. Bartram ve D. Vloeberghs (2008), “Age Differences in Work Motivation”, 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco.
  • Inkson, K. (2006), “Protean and Boundaryless Career as Metaphors”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 69(1), 48-63.
  • King, Z. (2004), “Career Self-Management: Its Nature, Causes and Consequences”, Journal of Vocational Behavior 65, 112–133
  • McDonald, P., K. Brown ve L. Bradley (2005), “Have Traditional Career Paths Given Way to Protean Ones? Evidence from Senior Managers in The Australian Public Sector”, Career Development International,10(2), 10 9-129
  • Miner, A. S. ve D. F. Robinson (1994), “Organizational and Population Level Learning as Engines for Career Transitions”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 345–364.
  • Mirvis, P. H. ve D. T. Hall (1994), “Psychological Success and The Boundaryless Career”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 365-380
  • Segers, J., I. Inceoglu, D. Vloeberghs, D. Bartram ve E. Henderickx (2008), “Protean and Boundaryless Careers: A Study on Potential Motivators”, Journal of Vocational Behavior 73(2), 212–230.
  • Seibert, S. E., M. L. Kraimer ve J. M. Crant (2001), “What Do Proactive People Do? A Longitudinal Model Unking Proactive Personality and Career Success”, Personnel Psychology, 54, 845-874
  • Sullivan, S. E. (1999) “The Changing Nature of Careers: A Review and Research Agenda”, Journal of Management, 25, 457–484.
  • Sullivan, S. E. ve M. B. Arthur (2006), “The Evolution of The Boundaryless Career Concept: Examining Physical and Psychological Mobility”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 19–29.
  • Sullivan, S. E., W. A. Carden ve D. F. Martin (1998), “Careers in The Next Millennium: Directions for Future Research”, Human Resource Management Review, 8, 165–185.
  • Valcour, M. ve J. J. Ladge (2008), “Family and Career Path Characteristics as Predictors of Women’s Objective and Subjective Career Success: Integrating Traditional and Protean Career Explanations”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73,300–30.
Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1306-6730
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi