Tenis eğitiminde kort ve duvar çalışmalarının karşılaştırılması

Bu çalışmanın amacı, duvar ve kort çalışmalarının tenis eğitimi üzerineetkisini karşılaştırmaktır. Araştırma, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulundaöğrenim gören 24 erkek gönüllünün katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Duvar ve kortçalışması yapmak için denekler rastgele iki ayrı gruba ayrılarak 10 hafta süresincetenis eğitimi verildi. Çalışma sonrası deneklerin tenis öğrenim becerileri UluslararasıTenis Numarası (UTN) ve Revize Dyer Duvar (RDD) testi ile tespit edildi. Verilerinanalizlerinde, gruplar arası karşılaştırma için t testi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanınsonucunda; UTN (duvar: 141.38±9.6 (UTN:8), kort: 117.71±11.2 (UTN:9)) ve RDD(duvar: 61±12.4, kort: 49.16±8) testlerinde anlamlı fark tespit edilmiştir (p˂0.05).Duvarda çalışan grup daha yüksek test skoru elde etmiştir. Bu sonuçlar ikiantrenman yönteminin de tenis becerisinin arttırmak için kullanılabileceğinigöstermektedir. Buna ek olarak, başlangıç seviyesinde eğitim verilirken tenisbecerisinin daha fazla arttırmak için duvar antrenmanlarının tercih edilmesiönerilmektedir.

The comparison of the wall and court training on tennis practices

The aim of this study was to compare the wall and court training on tennis practices. Twenty-four male students who educate School of Physical Education and Sports participated tennis training intervention. Participants randomly divided into two groups: Court group and the wall group and trained in 10-week. International Tennis Number (ITN) and Revised Dyer Test Wall (RDTW) results was registered at before and after 10-week training intervention. T-test was performed to compare differences between the Court and wall group results in this study. As a result of the study; there was a significant difference between the ITN (wall: 141.38 ± 9.6 (ITN:8), court: 117.71 ± 11.2 (ITN:9)) and the RDTW (wall: 61 ± 12.4, courts: 49.16 ± 8). Working group who trained with wall achieved higher test scores compared the other group. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that both training program could be used for improvement tennis skills. In addition, it should prefer wall training for more tennis skills improvement during beginner training.

PDF

___

Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Reid, M., & Masters, R. S. (2014). Modifying equipment in early skill development: A tennis perspective. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 85(2), 218-225.
Cannon, J.A. (1967). A test of predict ability for the beginning tenis player, Master’s thesis, The Graduate Faculty of Texas Technological College.
Coldwells, A., Hare, M. E. (1994). The transfer of skill from short tennis to lawn tennis, Ergonomics,37:1, 17–21.
Davids, K. W., Button, C., & Bennett, S. J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics.
Declercq, L. (2010). 10 and under competitive frame work in belgium, ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 51(18):9–10.
Dyer, J. T. (1938). Revision of the backboard test of tennis ability. Research Quarterly, 9(1), 25-31.
Elderton, W. (2010). Tactical and technical development considerations for 10 under players, ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 51(18):18–19.
Farrow, D., & Reid, M. (2010). The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(7), 723-732.
Gelen, E. (1998). Tenis motor beceri öğretiminde çift ve tek taraflı öğretim metodlarının karşılaştırılması, yüksek lisans tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
Gillet, E., Leroy, D., Thouvarecq, R., & Stein, J. F. (2009). A notational analysis of elite tennis serve and serve-return strategies on slow surface.The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23(2), 532-539.
ITF tenis rules, (2011). (Erişim tarihi: Mayıs 2012).
ITN Categories, (2016). ˂http://www.tennisplayandstay.com/itn/itn-categories/itn-categories.aspx#> (Erişim tarihi: Kasım 2016).
ITN on court assessment, (2010). (Erişim tarihi: 10 ağustos 2010).
Kachel, K., Buszard, T., & Reid, M. (2015). The effect of ball compression on the match-play characteristics of elite junior tennis players. Journal of sports sciences, 33(3), 320-326.
Kilit, B., Şenel, Ö., Arslan, E., & Can, S. (2016). Physiological responses and match characteristics in professional tennis players during a one-hour simulated tennis match. Journal of Human Kinetics, 50(2), 83-92.
Miley, D. (2010). Serve rally and score the ITF tenis play and stay campaign and tenis 10s, ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 51(18):3-4.
Newman, J. (2010). Why slower balls and smaller courts for 10 and under players? ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 51(18):5–6.
Reid, M., Elliott, B., & Crespo, M. (2013). Mechanics and learning practices associated with the tennis forehand: a review. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 12(2), 225-231.
Schönborn, R. (2000). Advanced technıques for competıtıve tennis, Meyer&meyer sport, Germany, P83–118.
Söğüt, M., Kirazci, S., & Korkusuz, F. (2012). The effects of rhythm training on tennis performance. Journal of human kinetics, 33, 123-132.
Stoebe, H. E. (1976). The relationship of grip strength and tennis ability, Master’s thesis, School of health physical education and recreation, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.
Tenis Antrenörü Eğitim Talimatı, (2006). (Erişim tarihi: 10 Eylül 2012).
Tennis 10s, (2016). (Erişim tarihi: 10 Eylül 2016).
Tsetseli, M., Malliou, V., Zetou, E., Michalopoulou, M., & Kambas, A. (2010). The effect of coordination training program on the development of tennis service technique. Biology of Exercise, 6(1).
Unierzyski, P., Crespo, M. (2007). Review of modern teaching methods for tennis, Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 7(3), 1-10. (Erişim tarihi: 3 Nisan 2010).
Waite, R., (2008). Back To The Board, (Erişim tarihi: 1 Şubat 2012).
Wikipedia, (2012). “Short tennis” (Erişim tarihi: 16 Ocak 2012).