Veri zarflama analizi ile Kapadokya Bölgesindeki Belediyelerin etkinlik ölçümü: 2004 ve 2008 yıllarına ilişkin bir karşılaştırma

ölçülmüş, etkin olan ve olmayan belediyeler belirlenmiş ve etkin olmayan belediyeler için iyileştirmeye yönelik birtakım öneriler geliştirilmiştir. Etkinlik ölçümü dört spesifik model kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu modeller; çöp hizmetleri modeli, imar hizmetleri modeli, mali model ve su hizmetleri modelidir. Etkinlik ölçümleri 2004 ve 2008 yılları için ayrı ayrı yapılmış ve böylelikle her iki dönem bakımından bu 14 belediyenin etkinlik düzeyleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre çöp hizmetleri modelinde hem 2004 hem de 2008 yılında 5; imar hizmetleri modelinde 2004 yılında 5, 2008 yılında 6; mali modelde 2004 yılında 6, 2008 yılında 9; su hizmetleri modelinde ise 2004 yılında 5, 2008 yılında 9 belediyenin etkin olduğu görülmüştür.

Measuring the efficiency of municipalities in the Cappadocia region using data envelopment analysis: A comparison of 2004 and 2008

In this paper relative efficiency of municipalities in the Cappadocia region were evaluated using Data Envelopment Analysis. Efficient and inefficient municipalities were determined and in order to make improvements some suggestions were developed for the inefficient municipalities. Efficiency measurement was conducted using four specific models. These models are garbage collection services model, reconstruction services model, financial model and water services model. Efficiency measurements were made for both 2004 and 2008; efficiency levels of 14 municipalities could be compared in these two periods. According to the results of analysis; in garbage collection services model 5 municipalities were found to be efficient for both 2004 and 2008. In reconstruction services model numbers of efficient municipalities were 5 and 6 for 2004 and 2008, respectively. 6 municipalities were efficient in 2004 and 9 were efficient in 2008 in the financial model. Finally in the water services model 5 of the municipalities were efficient in 2004 and 9 of them in 2008.

PDF

___

ADLER, Nicole; Lea FRIEDMAN ve Zilla SINUANY-STERN; (2002), “Review of Ranking Methods in the Data Envelopment Analysis Context”, European Journal of Operational Research, 140, ss. 249– 265.
AFONSO, Antonio ve Sonia FERNANDES; (2008), “Assessing and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Local Government”, The Journal of Socio- Economics, 37, ss. 1946–1979.
AKAL, Zühal; (2002), İşletmelerde Performans Ölçüm ve Denetimi: Çok Yönlü Performans Göstergeleri, MPM Yayınları, Yayın No: 473, Ankara, 368s.
AYDEMİR, Birol; (2000), “Belediyelerin Gelir Kaynakları ve Gelirlerinin Analizi”, Yerel Yönetim ve Denetim Dergisi, 5(2), ss. 42–52.
BALAGUER-COLL, Maria T.; Diego PRIOR ve Emili TORTOSA-AUSINA; (2007), “On the Determinants of Local Government Performance: A Two-Stage Nonparametric Approach”, European Economic Review, Vol. 51, ss. 425–451.
BANKER, Rajiv D.; William W. COOPER; Lawrence M. SEIFORD; Robert M. THRALL ve Joe ZHU;; (2004), “Returns to Scale in Different DEA Models”, European Journal of Operational Research, 154, ss. 345– 362.
BESEN, F. B.; (1994), Performans Yönetim Sistemi ve Veri Zarflama Analizinin Sağlık Sektöründe Uygulanması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İ.T.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
BOWLIN, William F.; (1998), “Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)”, The Journal of Cost Analysis, Fall 1998, ss.3–27.
COOPER, William W.; Lawrence M. SEIFORD ve Joe ZHU; (2004), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 592s.
COOPER, William W.; Shanling LI; Lawrence M. SEIFORD; Kaoru TONE; Robert M. THRALL ve Joe ZHU; (2001), “Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA: Some Recent Developments”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15, ss.217–246.
ÇAĞLAR, Atalay; (2003), Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Belediyelerin Etkinlik Ölçümü, Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 170s.
DE BORGER, Bruno ve Kristiaan KERSTENS; (1996), “Cost Efficiency of Belgian Local Governments: A Comparative Analysis of FDH, DEA and Econometric Approaches”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(2), ss.145–170.
ERDUMLU, Güngör; (1995), “Performance Measurement in Municipalities”, New Visions and Strategies for the Next Century: People, Technology and Productivity, Ninth World Productivity Congress, June 4–7 1995, İstanbul, l, ss.632–643.
GÜNER, Ayşe; (2004), “Belediyelerin Öz Gelirleri”, Vergi Dünyası, 274, ss.146–151.
GÜNEŞ, İsmail ve Melek AKDOĞAN; (2007), “Büyükşehir Belediye Hizmetlerinin Göreli Etkinlik Analizi”, Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 16(4), ss.39–66.
GÜRAN, M. Cahit ve Selçuk CİNGİ; (2002), “Devletin Ekonomik Müdahalelerinin Etkinliği”, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 3, ss. 56–89.
HASLEM, John A.; Carl A. SCHERAGA ve James P. BEDINGFIELD; (1999), “DEA Efficiency Profiles of U.S. Banks Operating Internationally”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 8, ss.165–182.
HSIAO, Ching-Kai; Chung-Te TING ve Yi-Hsing LIN; (2004), “The Performance Analysis of Adopting Information System by Agricultural Groups in Taiwan”, Afita/Wcca Joint Congress on it in Agriculture.
KAPLAN, Muhittin; Tuncay ÇELİK ve Recep TEKELİ; (2006), “Türkiye’de Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Performanslarının Ampirik Analizi, 2002– 2004”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, 5. Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı, Cilt 2, 3–5 Kasım 2006, Kocaeli , ss.679–692
KUMAR, U. Dinesh; Haritha SARANGA; Jose E. RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ ve David NOWICKI; (2007), “Six Sigma Project Selection Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, The TQM Magazine, 19(5), ss.419–441.
LEITNER, Karl H.; Michaela S. LINZATTI; Rainer STOWASSER ve Karin WAGNER; (2004), “Revealing the True Story Behind Statistical Information: A Data Envelopment Approach (DEA) to Analyse Austria's University’s Research Performance”, Data Envelopment Analysis and Performance Management, 4th International Symposium of DEA, Aston University, 5–6 September 2004, ss.332– 338.
MAHALLİ İDARELER GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ, Belediyelerde Performans Ölçümü Projesi (BEPER), İnternet Adresi: http://www.beper.gov.tr/, Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2009.
MAHALLİ İDARELER GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ, Yerel Yönetimler Bilgi Tabanı Projesi (Yerel Bilgi), İnternet Adresi: http://www.yerelbilgi.gov.tr, Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2006.
ÖZGÜVEN, CEMAL; (2008), Doğrusal Programlama ve Uzantıları: Model Kurma Örnekleri, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
PRIETO, Angel M. ve Jose L. ZOFIO; (2001), “Evaluating Effectiveness in Public Provision of Infrastructure and Equipment: The Case of Spanish Municipalities”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15, ss.41–58.
RAMANATHAN, Ramakrishnan; (2006), “Data Envelopment Analysis for Weight Derivation and Aggregation in the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Computers & Operations Research, 33, ss.1289–1307.
SAMPAIO DE SOUSA, Maria C. ve Borko STOSIC; (2005), “Technical Efficiency of the Brazilian Municipalities: Correcting Nonparametric Frontier Measurements for Outliers”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24, ss.157–181.
SCHEEL, Holger; “Efficiency Measurement System (EMS)”, Holger Scheel’s DEA Page, İnternet Adresi: http://www.wiso.uni-dortmund.de/lsfg/or/ scheel/ems/, Erişim Tarihi: 26.06.2005.
TANGEN, Stefan; (2005), “Demystifying Productivity and Performance”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(1), ss.34–46.
TORLAK, Ömer; (1999), Belediyelerde Hizmet Yönetimi ve Pazarlama, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 173s.
TUPPER, Henrique Cesar ve Marcelo RESENDE; (2004), “Efficiency and Regulatory Issues in the Brazilian Water and Sewage Sector: An Empirical Study”, Utilities Policy, Vol. 12, ss.29–40.
WOODBURY, Kim ve Brian DOLLERY; (2004), “Efficiency Measurement in Australian Local Government: The Case of New South Wales Municipal Water Services”, Review of Policy Research, 21(5), ss.615– 636.
YOLALAN, Reha; (1993), İşletmelerarası Göreli Etkinlik Ölçümü, MPM Yayınları, Yayın No. 483, Ankara, 96s.
YUN, Ye Boon; Hirotaka NAKAYAMA ve Tetsuzo TANINO; (2004), “A Generalized Model for Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 157, ss.87–105