Doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının kurumlar vergisi gelirleri üzerindeki etkisinin ekonometrik analizi

Bu çalışmada, doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının (DYSY) ev sahibi ülkedeki kurumlar vergisi hâsılatına etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaçla 21 OECD ülkesinin 1981 2008 yılı verileri kullanarak panel regresyon ekonometrik yöntemiyle yaptığımız çalışmada DYSY gerçekleştirildikten 1 ve 2 yıl sonra ev sahibi ülkenin kurumlar vergisi hâsılatı üzerinde olumlu etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüştür. 21 ülke içinde DYSYnin kurumlar vergisi hâsılatını en çok artırdığı ülke Norveç, en az ise Türkiyedir. Bu ayrışmaya kurumlar vergisi oranları, harcamaları, etkinliği gibi konularda ülkeler arasındaki farklılıkların neden olabileceği düşünülmektedir.

The econometric analysis of the effects of foreign direct investment on corporate income tax

In this study, it is aimed to examine of effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) on corporate tax revenue in host country. To that end, in this study we use the data which belongs to 21 OECD countries between 1981 to 2008 years and we found that after 1 and 2 years performed FDI which positive contribution to corporate tax revenue of host countries. Norway within the 21 countries is the most contribution of FDI on corporate tax revenue to a country but Turkey is least. It is thought of such as corporate tax rates, corporate tax expenditures, efficiency in tax system are the reasons of these differences between the countries.

___

  • BISWAS, Romita; (2002), “Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment”, Review of Development Economics, 6 (3), ss. 492–504,
  • DEMEKAS, Dimitri G., Balazs HORVATH, Elina RIBAKOVA ve Yi WU; (2005), Foreign Direct Investment in Southeastern Europe: How (and How Much) Can Policies Help?, IMF Working Paper: WP/05/110.
  • De MOOIJ, Ruud A. ve Sjef EDERVEEN; (November 2003), “Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research”, International Tax and Public Finance, 10 (6), ss. 673–693,
  • De MOOIJ, Ruud A. ve Sjef EDERVEEN; (2005), “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Respond to Taxes? A Meta Analysis”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/shared/shared_levevents/conferences/200 5_Oct_ruud _de_mooij_paper.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 07.02.2010.
  • DEVEREUX, Michael. P. ve Harold FREEMAN; (1995), “The Impact of Tax on Foreign Direct Investment: Empirical Evidence and the Implications for Tax Integration Schemes”, International Tax and Public Finance, 2, ss. 85–106.
  • DEVEREUX, Michael P. ve Rachel GRIFFITH; (2002), “The Impact of Corporate Taxation on the Location of Capital: A Review”, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 9, ss. 79–102,
  • FILIPPOV, Sergey ve Kálmán KALOTAY; (2009), Foreign Direct Investment in Times of Global Economic Crisis: Spotlight on New Europe, UNU-MERIT Working Papers, No: 2009–021.
  • GOLUB, Stephen S.; (2003), Measures of Restrictions on Inward Foreign Direct Investment for OECD Countries, Economics Department Working Papers No. 357.
  • GROPP, Reint ve Kristina KOSTIAL; (2000), The Disappearing Tax Base: Is Foreign Direct Investment Eroding Corporate Income Taxes?, European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No. 31.
  • GRUBERT, Harry ve Jonh MUTTI; (1991), “Taxes, Tariffs and Transfer Pricing in Multinational Corporate Decision Making”, Review of Economics and Statistics 73 (2), ss. 285– 293.
  • HARTMAN, David C.; (1982), Tax Policy And Foreign Direct Investment In The United States, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 967,
  • HINES, James R., Jr.; (1997), “Tax Policy and the Activities of Multinational Corporations”, Fiscal Policy: Lessons from Economic Research, Alan J. AUERBACH (Ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge MA, ss. 401–445.
  • HINES, James R., Jr.; (1999), “Lessons from Behavioural Responses to International Taxation”, National Tax Journal, 54, ss. 305–322.
  • HINES, James R., Jr. ve Eric M. RICE; (1994), “Fiscal Paradise: Foreign tax Havens and American Business”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, ss. 149–182.
  • KPMG; (2006), “KPMG's Corporate Tax Rate Survey: An international Analysis of Corporate Tax Rates from 1993 to 2006”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.bpb.de/files/H7INZU.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2009.
  • KOYAMA, Takeshi ve Stephen GOLUB; (2006), OECD’S FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index: Revision and Extension to More Economies, Economics Department Working Papers No. 525.
  • LANASPA, Luis; Fernando PUEYO ve Fernando SANZ; (June, 2008), “Foreign Direct Investment, Industrial Location and Capital Taxation”, The Annals of Regional Science, 42 (2), s. 413–423.
  • LIU, Chang; (2009), “Financial Crisis and FDI’s Interest in China’s Hinterland: A Quest for Social Infrastructure Factors”, International Conference on The Global Financial Crisis & International, Trade and Financial Architecture, Korea University, Seoul, Korea: November 13, 2009, İnternet Adresi: http://globalisationandeconomicpolicy.com/ shared/ shared_levevents/conferences/Chang_Liu_s__paper_for_ Korean_ workshop.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2010.
  • OECD; “OECD Tax Database”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/ 26/56/33717459.xls, Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2009.
  • OECD; (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment for Development: Maximising
  • Benefits, Minimising Costs”, İnternet Adresi: http://titania.sourceoecd. org/vl=1835591/ cl=25/nw=1/rpsv/cgi-bin/fulltextew.pl?prpsv =/ij/oecdthemes/ 9998007x/v2002n24/s1/p1l.idx, Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2010.
  • OECD; (2008), “OECD Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment, Fourth Edition”, İnternet Adresi: http://browse.oecdbookshop .org/oecd/pdfs/browseit/ 2008031E.PDF, Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010.
  • QUERE; Agnes B., Lionel FONTAGNE ve Amina L. REVIL; (2005), “How Does FDI React to Corporate Taxation?”, International Tax and Public Finance, 12, ss. 583–603.
  • PATTERSON, Neil ve Marie MONTANJEES, John MOTALA ve Colleen CARDILLO; (2004), “Foreign Direct Investment: Trends, Data Availability, Concepts, and Recording Practices”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fdi/2004/fditda.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010.
  • SEDMIHRADSKY, Milan ve Stanislav KLAZAR; (January 2002), Tax Competition for FDI in Central-European Countries, CESifo Working Paper No. 647 (1).
  • TARI, Recep; (2010), Ekonometri, Altıncı Baskı, Umuttepe Yayınları, Kocaeli, 534s.
  • The World Bank the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA);
  • (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment Survey”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.miga.org/ documents/ FDIsurvey.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010.
  • UNCTAD; “Definitions of FDI”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.unctad.org/ Templates/ Page.asp? intItemID=3147&lang=1, Erişim Tarihi: 27.01.2010.
  • UNCTAD; “FDI Stat, Major FDI indicators (WIR 2009)”, İnternet Adresi: http://stats.unctad.org/FDI/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=308 4, Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2009.
  • UNCTAD; (1998), “World Investment Report 1998: Trends and Determinants”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/wir1998_en.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2010.
  • UNCTAD; (1999), “Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI) and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Characteristics, Similarities, Complementarities and Differences, Policy Implications and Development Impact”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/c2em6d2&c1.en.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2010.
  • UNCTAD; (2009), “Assessing the Impact of the Current Financial and Economic Crisis on Global FDI Flows”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.unctad.org/ en/docs/diaeia20093_en.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2010.
  • UNCTAD; (2010), “World Investment Report 2010: Investing in a Low-Carbon Economy”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.unctad.org/ en/docs/wir2010_en.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 31.01.2010.
Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-3688
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1981
  • Yayıncı: -