The Turkish Short Version of the CSpeech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) for Clinical Use: Determining Reliability and Validity for People with and without Hearing Loss on the Basis of SSQ12-A, SSQ12-B, SSQ12-C

The Turkish Short Version of the CSpeech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) for Clinical Use: Determining Reliability and Validity for People with and without Hearing Loss on the Basis of SSQ12-A, SSQ12-B, SSQ12-C

Objective: This study was aimed at analyzing the validity and reliability of a Turkish shortened version of Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing (SSQ) scale for adults using hearing aids and/or cochlear implants. The analysis was based on three forms of the SSQ, namely, SSQ12-A, SSQ12-B, and SSQ12-C. Methods: A total of two hundred and fifty-eight individuals with moderate or moderate- to-severe (n = 98), severe or very severe hearing loss (n = 71) and normal hearing (n = 89) from four centers participated in our study. SSQ12-A was administered to individuals who were suffering from hearing loss, and with normal hearing but were not previously fitted with a hearing aid. SSQ12-B was distributed to individuals who had been using a hearing aid for at least 6 months, and SSQ12-C was administered to individuals who had been using cochlear implants for at least 6 months. SSQ12-A was then re-administered to 27 individuals with hearing loss for the reliability of the questionnaire. Results: The internal consistency and reliability of all the three questionnaires were high (Cronbach’s α = 0.96, α = 0.96, and α = 0.84, respectively). Individuals with moderate hearing loss derived higher scores than did the individuals with severe or very severe hearing in SSQ12-A and SSQ12-B. No statistically significant difference was found between the scores (p > 0.05) of the respondents in the first and second rounds of SSQ12-A administration. Conclusions: The Turkish shortened version of the SSQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing hearing function. The three forms of the SSQ12 are useful for evaluatinghearing impairment and in organizing rehabilitation programs.

___

  • 1. World Health Organisation. 1.1 billion people at risk of hearing loss, 2015. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/ 2015/ear-care/en/. Accessed on 9 August 2020.
  • 2. Granberg S, Swanepoel de W, Englund U, Möller C, Danermark B. The ICF core sets for hearing loss project: international expert survey on functioning and disability of adults with hearing loss using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Int J Audiol. 2014;53(8):497-506. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Ou H, Kim E. Which short version of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale to choose: SSQ5 or SSQ12. J Otorhinolaryngol Disord Treat. 2017;60(6):279-294.
  • 4. Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing aids. Ear Hear. 2009;30(2):203-218. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Gatehouse S, Noble W. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004;43(2):85-99. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Tyler RS, Perreau AE, Ji H. Validation of the spatial hearing questionnaire. Ear Hear. 2009;30(4):466-474. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Hua H, Johansson B, Jönsson R, Magnusson L. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(9):722-732. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Olsen SØ, Hernvig LH, Nielsen LH. Self-reported hearing performance among subjects with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Med. 2012;10(2):83-92. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Noble W, Jensen NS, Naylor G, Bhullar N, Akeroyd MA. A short form of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(6):409-412. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Kießling J, Grugel L, Meister H, et al. SSQ ins Deutsche und deren evaluation. Z Audiol. 2011;50(1):6-16.
  • 11. Jensen N, Akeroyd M, Noble W, Naylor G, editors. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ) as a benefit measure. NCRAR conference on The Ear-Brain System: Approaches to the Study and Treatment of Hearing Loss; 2009.
  • 12. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):141-151. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Miranda-Gonsalez ECd, Almeida Kd. Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial and qualities of HEARing scale (SSQ): pilot study of a short version in Brazilian Portuguese. Audiol Commun Res. 2017;22. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Singh G, Pichora-Fuller K. M. Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(10):733-740.
  • 15. Akeroyd MA, Guy FH, Harrison DL, Suller SL. A factor analysis of the SSQ (speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale). Int J Audiol. 2014;53(2):101-114. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Ou H, Perreau A, Tyler RS. Development of a shortened version of the spatial HEARing questionnaire (SHQ-S) for screening spatial-hearing ability. Am J Audiol. 2017;26(3):293-300. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Cañete OM, Marfull D, Torrente MC, Purdy SC. The Spanish 12-item version of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (sp- SSQ12): adaptation, reliability, and discriminant validity for people with and without hearing loss. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42:1-8.
  • 18. Kılıç N. Speech, spatial and quality of hearing scale (SSQ) for Turkish language and evaluation of adults with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss by SSQ [in Turkish] Gazi University Institute of Health Sciences. Normalization and Adaptation of MSc Thesis; 2017.
ENT Updates-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-7109
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Prof.Dr.Murat Demir
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Effect of Ear Drainage and Middle Ear Inflammation due to Chronic Otitis Media on Infrared Tympanic Temperature Measurement

İlknur HABERAL CAN, Yunus KANTEKİN, Hakan DAĞİSTAN, Ceyhun CENGİZ, Ender ŞAHİN

Comparison of Two Techniques in Pediatric Tonsillectomy: Erbe Unipolar Electrocautery and Thermal Welding System

Seçil Bahar DAL, Ömer Faruk ÜNAL, Suheyla EKEMEN, Teoman DAL

Relationship Between Hemoglobin Glycation and AHI Index in Patients With Non-diabetic OSAS ABSTRACT

Bilal İLANBEY, Yalçın BODUROĞLU, Hacı Mehmet ÇALIŞKAN, Duygu ZORLU

Relationship Between Parathormone and Inflammatory Markers on Complete Blood Count in Parathyroid Adenoma Patients

Güleser SAYLAM, Ömer BAYIR, Mehmet Hakan KORKMAZ, Muhammed Erkam SENCAR, İlknur ÖZTÜRK ÜNSAL, Mehmet Furkan ÇIRAKOĞLU, Volkan YÜCEL

Comparison of Outcomes of Hearing Reconstruction Techniques for Isolated Incus Long Process Defects

Fatih MUTLU, Murat ÖZTÜRK, Kasım DURMUŞ, Hasan Mervan DEĞER

The Turkish Short Version of the CSpeech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) for Clinical Use: Determining Reliability and Validity for People with and without Hearing Loss on the Basis of SSQ12-A, SSQ12-B, SSQ12-C

Suna TOKGÖZ YILMAZ, Bünyamin ÇILDIR, Samet KILIÇ, Başak ÖZKİŞİ

Assessment of Noise Sensitivity in Migraine Patients

Ozan GÖKDOĞAN, Yusuf Kemal KEMALOĞLU, Çağıl GÖKDOĞAN, Bülent CENGİZ

Does Nasal Septum Deviation with Different Locations and Different Angular Features Affect Maxillary Sinus Volumes?

Deniz AVCI, Şaban TİRYAKİ

A Clinicopathological Evaluation of the Patients with Supraclavicular Lymphadenopathy: A Retrospective Analysis

Fatih MUTLU, Büşra Yaprak BAYRAK, Özgür ÇAKIR

The Outcomes in Patients Treated With Intratympanic and Systemic Steroids for Sudden Hearing Loss and Prognostic Factors

Özgür KEMAL, Ayşe BEL ÇEÇEN, Mustafa TAŞTAN, Özlem TERZİ