Risk Factors for Postoperative Neck Complaints After Robot-Assisted Surgery. A Systematic Literature Review

Risk Factors for Postoperative Neck Complaints After Robot-Assisted Surgery. A Systematic Literature Review

Background: Robot-assisted and image-guided surgery have become increasingly important because it outperforms human dexterity. For procedures on sub-millimetric level, fixing the patient’s head firmly is crucial. Although the neck is not the target organ of the operation, it may be at risk of postoperative complaints due to positioning or fixation. The incidence of postoperative symptoms after head and neck surgery with fixation is hardly reported and probably underestimated, in regards to the lifethreatening cranial pathologies for which the surgery was required. Methods: To identify papers on risk factors for postoperative complaints after head and neck surgery, we performed a systematic review. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using predefined in- and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses and reviews were excluded. Postoperative complaints concerned pain, quality of life, discomfort, neuropraxia, and musculoskeletal problems. This review is reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: Seven eligible studies were identified, only 2 concerned surgery requiring head fixation. The significant risk factors resulting from our analysis were preoperative pain (odds ratio = 2.19), expected pain (odds ratio = 2.15), short-term fear (odds ratio = 1.42), age between 45 and 59 years old (odds ratio = 1.40), pain catastrophizing (odds ratio = 1.21), and female gender (odds ratio = 0.74). Conclusion: Six significant risk factors for iatrogenic postoperative complaints after head and neck surgery have been identified. These risk factors should be considered as possible confounding factors in future research. Little literature could be found. Upcoming robotic surgeries in the head and neck area pose a clinical need for more specific studies on postoperative iatrogenic complaints.

___

  • 1. Center RhaNS. Robotic Head and Neck Surgery Center. http: //www .otol aryng ology .pitt .edu/ cente rs-ex celle nce/r oboti c-hea d-and -neck -surg ery-c enter .
  • 2. Rangarajan S, Hachem RA, Ozer E, Beer-Furlan A, Prevedello D, Carrau RL. Robotics in sinus and skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017;50(3):633-641. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Zamorano L, Li Q, Jain S, Kaur G. Robotics in neurosurgery: state of the art and future technological challenges. Int J Med Robot. 2004;1(1):7-22. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009;146(6):1048- 1055. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Serpell JW, Grodski SF, O'Donell C. Does neck extension elevate the thyroid gland cephalad to potentially improve access during thyroidectomy? ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(11):887-889. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Abergel A, Fliss DM, Margalit N, Gil Z. A prospective evaluation of short-term health-related quality of life in patients undergoing anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base. 2010;20(1):27-33. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Shah JP. Quality of life after skull base surgery: the Patient's predicament. Skull Base. 2010;20(1):3-4. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Ausman JI. A revolution in skull base surgery: the quality of life matters! Surg Neurol. 2006;65(6):635-636. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, et al. Quality of life following surgery for anterior skull base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(12):1303-1309. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Shabtai E, Khafif A, Fliss DM. Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(5):813-819. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Castelnuovo P, Lepera D, Turri-Zanoni M, et al. Quality of life following endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior skull base cancers. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(6):1401-1409. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Cavel O, Abergel A, Margalit N, Fliss DM, Gil Z. Quality of life following endoscopic resection of skull base tumors. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2012;73(2):112-116. [CrossRef]
  • 13. de Almeida JR, Vescan AD, Witterick IJ, et al. Changes experienced in quality of life for skull base surgical patients: a qualitative case study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(2):129-144. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Nikolopoulos TP, Johnson I, O'Donoghue GM. Quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(9):1382-1385. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLOS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Sataloff RT, Myers DL, Roberts BR. Pain following surgery of the skull base. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1984;17(3):613-625.
  • 18. Scholten RJPM, Offringa M, Assendelft WJJ. Inleiding in Evidence- Based Medicine [Klinisch handelen gebaseerd op bewijsmateriaal]. Houten : Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 2014.
  • 19. Fregoli L, Materazzi G, Miccoli M, et al. Postoperative pain evaluation after robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(2):146-150. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Lang BH, Ng SH, Wong KP. Pain and surgical outcomes with and without neck extension in standard open thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Head Neck. 2015;37(3):407-412. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Ryu HR, Lee J, Park JH, et al. A comparison of postoperative pain after conventional open thyroidectomy and transaxillary singleincision robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(7):2279-2284. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Song CM, Ji YB, Sung ES, Kim DS, Koo HR, Tae K. Comparison of Robotic versus Conventional Selective Neck Dissection and Total thyroidectomy for Papillary thyroid Carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(6):1005-1013. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Klimek M, Ubben JF, Ammann J, Borner U, Klein J, Verbrugge SJ. Pain in neurosurgically treated patients: a prospective observational study. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(3):350-359. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Sommer M, de Rijke JM, van Kleef M, et al. Predictors of acute postoperative pain after elective surgery. Clin J Pain. 2010;26(2):87-94. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Wattier JM, Caïazzo R, Andrieu G, Kipnis E, Pattou F, Lebuffe G. Chronic post-thyroidectomy pain: incidence, typology, and risk factors. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016;35(3):197-201. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2021. Available at: http: //www .ohri .ca/p rogra ms/cl inica l_epi demio logy/ oxfor d.asp .
  • 28. McPheeters ML, Kripalani S, Peterson NB, et al. Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 3: quality improvement interventions to address health disparities). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012;208(208):1-475.
  • 29. Brandsborg B, Dueholm M, Nikolajsen L, Kehlet H, Jensen TS. A prospective study of risk factors for pain persisting 4 months after hysterectomy. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(4):263-268. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Daccache G, Caspersen E, Pegoix M, et al. A targeted remifentanil administration protocol based on the analgesia nociception index during vascular surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(4):229- 232. [CrossRef]
  • 31. Lee JY, Kim HC, Huh JW, et al. Incidence and risk factors for rectal pain after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(2):781-791. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Khatib Y, Madan A, Naylor JM, Harris IA. Do psychological factors predict poor outcome in patients undergoing TKA? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(8):2630-2638. [CrossRef]
  • 33. Rosenberger PH, Jokl P, Ickovics J. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(7):397-405. [CrossRef]
  • 34. Granot M, Ferber SG. The roles of pain catastrophizing and anxiety in the prediction of postoperative pain intensity: a prospective study. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(5):439-445. [CrossRef]
  • 35. Ruscheweyh R, Viehoff A, Tio J, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Psychophysical and psychological predictors of acute pain after breast surgery differ in patients with and without pre-existing chronic pain. Pain. 2017;158(6):1030-1038. [CrossRef]
  • 36. Wright D, Hoang M, Sofine A, Silva JP, Schwarzkopf R. Pain catastrophizing as a predictor for postoperative pain and opiate consumption in total joint arthroplasty patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137(12):1623-1629. [CrossRef]
  • 37. Potter MQ, Wylie JD, Greis PE, Burks RT, Tashjian RZ. Psychological distress negatively affects self-assessment of shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3926-3932. [CrossRef]
  • 38. Rice DA, Kluger MT, McNair PJ, et al. Persistent postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study of potential risk factors. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(4):804-812. [CrossRef]
  • 39. Hah JM, Cramer E, Hilmoe H, et al. Factors associated With acute pain estimation, postoperative pain resolution, opioid cessation, and recovery: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(3):e190168. [CrossRef]
  • 40. Kampe S, Wendland M, Welter S, et al. Independent predictors for higher postoperative pain intensity during recovery after open thoracic surgery: a retrospective analysis in 621 patients. Pain Med. 2018;19(8):1667-1673. [CrossRef]
  • 41. Liu SS, Buvanendran A, Rathmell JP, et al. Predictors for moderate to severe acute postoperative pain after total hip and knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2012;36(11):2261-2267. [CrossRef]
  • 42. Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(3):657-677. [CrossRef]
  • 43. Gagliese L, Gauthier LR, Macpherson AK, Jovellanos M, Chan VW. Correlates of postoperative pain and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia use in younger and older surgical patients. Pain Med. 2008;9(3):299-314. [CrossRef]
  • 44. Loriga B, Di Filippo A, Tofani L, et al. Postoperative pain after vitreoretinal surgery is influenced by surgery duration and anesthesia conduction. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(7):731-737. [CrossRef]
  • 45. Dahmani S, Dupont H, Mantz J, Desmonts JM, Keita H. Predictive factors of early morphine requirements in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(3):385-389. [CrossRef]
  • 46. Nikolajsen L, Sørensen HC, Jensen TS, Kehlet H. Chronic pain following Caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(1):111-116. [CrossRef]
  • 47. Andreae MH, Andreae DA. Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia for preventing chronic pain after surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD007105. [CrossRef]
  • 48. Ghoneim MM, O'Hara MW. Depression and postoperative complications: an overview. BMC Surg. 2016;16:5. [CrossRef]
  • 49. Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:359-363
ENT Updates-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-7109
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Prof.Dr.Murat Demir
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Analysis of 79 Hospitalized Severe Epistaxis Patients and Review of Literature

Demet YAZICI, Gülali OCAR, Orhan GÖRGÜLÜ

A Diagnostic Challenge: Risk Factors and Surgical Treatment of Laryngeal Chondroradionecrosis

Bora BAŞARAN, Berkay ÇAYTEMEL, Cömert ŞEN, İsmet ASLAN, Can DORUK, Selin ÜNSALER

Woakes’ Syndrome; Rare Manifestation of Nasal Polyposis: Experience of Seven Patients

Çağlar GÜNEBAKAN, Selçuk KUZU, Erhan BOZKURT, İhsan CANBEK, Fatih YÜCEDAĞ

Group A Streptococcal Tonsillopharyngitis: The Diagnostic Power of the Centor and McIsaac Clinical Prediction Models at Different Pre-probability

Melda DİBEK BÜYÜKDİNÇ, Hatice Sema BAŞAK, Elif ÇELİK, Mücahit AVCİL, Murat TELLİ, Mevlüt TÜRE, Okay BAŞAK

Risk Factors for Postoperative Neck Complaints After Robot-Assisted Surgery. A Systematic Literature Review

Ellis ROMMERS, Laura JACXSENS, Naomi Van BRUSSEL, Willem De HERTOGH, Vedat TOPSAKAL

Tympanoplasty with Boomerang-Shaped Chondoperichondrial Graft: Long-Term Results

Tarık YAĞCI, Rıza DÜNDAR, Ahmet YÜKKALDIRAN

The Correlation Between Sleep Efficiency During Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Titration Polysomnography and Epworth Sleepiness Scale Score in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

José Fernando POLANSKI, Giovanna Santos PIEDADE, Cynthia Fontoura KLAS, Miryan Priscilla Santos Bona FORTE, Maurício BUSCHLE

Endoscopic Treatment of Juvenile Angiofibromas: Experience of a Tertiary Center from 1993 to 2020

Laure POELS, Laura Van GERVEN, Mark JORISSEN

Chest Image Staging and Prevalence of Current Smoking Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Turkey

Sinan EROĞLU, İmran AYDOĞDU, Şule Nurdan YOLUÇ, Eren ŞAHİN, Yasemin EROĞLU