Mustafa ÇOLAK, İsmet BAYRAMOĞLU, Hakan TUTAR, Şenay ALTINYAY

Benefits on language development and auditory perception performance of using a contralateral hearing aid in cochlear implanted children

Objective: To evaluate the benefits of a contralateral hearing aid on expressive and receptive language development and auditory perception performance over a 36-month post-surgical period in children implanted on a single side with a cochlear device for bilateral pre-lingual profound sensorineural hearing loss. Methods: Seventy-five patients with idiopathic profound sensorineural hearing loss were included. The cases were divided into two groups: cochlear implant users (50 patients, “CI group”) and cochlear implant plus hearing aid users (25 patients, “CI+HA group”). Language development and auditory performance were compared in the two groups during the first 3 years following cochlear implant surgery. The Pre-school Language Scale-4 was used to assess language development and the LittlEars® Auditory Survey, Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale were employed to assess auditory perception performance. Results: Language development in the CI+HA group was superior to that in the CI group at 6 months post-surgery, in terms of receptive and expressive language development; auditory perception performance was also superior in the CI+HA group, compared to the CI group. Conclusion: The use of a contralateral hearing aid in cochlear implanted children with prelingual sensorineural hearing loss positively contributes to language devel-opment and auditory perception performance.

PDF

___

1. Paludetti G, Conti G, DI Nardo W, et al. Infant hearing loss: from diagnosis to therapy Official Report of XXI Conference of Italian Society of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2012;32:34770.

2. Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Davis AC, Bamford JM. Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study. BMJ 2001;323:536-40.

3. Paradise JL, Dollaghan CA, Campbell TF, et al. Language, Speech Sound Production, and Cognition in Three-Year-Old Children in Relation to Otitis Media in Their First Three Years of Life. Pediatrics 2000;105:111930.

4. Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Osberger MJ, Ertmer D. Speech intelligibility of implanted children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:399-401.

5. Nelson PB, Jin SH. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:2286-94.

6. Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;116:1081-91.

7. Stickney GS, Nie K, Zeng FG. Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118:2412-20.

8. Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, et al. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: A 6-month comparative study. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:596-606.

9. Warren SE, Dunbar MN. Bimodal Hearing in Individuals with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: Benefits, Challenges, and Management. Semin Hear 2018;39:405-13.

10. Ching TY, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear 2001;22:365-80.

11. Yalçınkaya F, Bayoglu B, Saraçbaşl O, Belgin E. Turkish adaptation of speech and language disorders test: Preschool Language Scale, fourth edition: PLS-4. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2007;11:87.

12. Tsiakpini V, Weichbold H, Kuehn-Inacker F, Coninx E, D’Haese P, Almadin S. LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire. Innsbruck: MED-EL Corp.; 2004.

13. Robbins AM, Renshaw JJ, Berry SW. Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otol 1991;12:14450.

14. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2003;24:485-500.

15. Sarant J, Harris D, Bennet L, Bant S. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: a study of spoken language outcomes. Ear Hear 2014;35:396-409.

16. Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar SP. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children. Int J Audiol 2006;45:78-91.

17. Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:668-80.

18. Luntz M, Shpak T, Weiss H. Binaural-bimodal hearing: concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:863-9.

19. Dorman MF, Gifford RH, Spahr AJ, McKarns SA. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiol Neurotol 2008;13:105-12.

20. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, McKarns SA, Spahr AJ. Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007;50:835-43.

21. Zhang T, Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Saoji A. Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit. Ear Hear 2013;34:133-41.

22. Ching TY, Day J, Van Buynder P, et al. Language and speech perception of young children with bimodal fitting or bilateral cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2014;15:43-6.

23. Nittrouer S, Chapman C. The Effects of Bilateral Electric and Bimodal Electric–Acoustic Stimulation on Language Development. Trends Amplif 2009;13:190-205.

24. Iwasaki S, Nishio S, Moteki H, et al. Language development in Japanese children who receive cochlear implant and/or hearing aid. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:433-8.

25. Allum JH, Greisiger R, Straubhaar S, Carpenter MG. Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol. Br J Audiol 2000;34:293-303.

26. McConkey Robbins A, Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kishon-Rabin L. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:570-4.

27. Di Nardo W, Giannantonio S, Di Giuda D, De Corso E, Schinaia L, Paludetti G. Role of auditory brain function assessment by SPECT in cochlear implant side selection. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013;33:23–8.

28. Marsella P, Giannantonio S, Scorpecci A, Pianesi F, Micardi M, Resca A. Role of bimodal stimulation for auditory-perceptual skills development in children with a unilateral cochlear implant. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2015;35:442-8.

29. De Raeve L, Vermeulen A, Snik A. Verbal cognition in deaf children using cochlear implants: Effect of unilateral and bilateral stimulation. Audiol Neurootol 2015;20:261-6.

30. Ching TY, van Wanrooy E, Dillon H. Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review. Trends Amplif 2007;11:161-92

31. Beijen JW, Mylanus EA, Leeuw AR, Snik AF. Should a hearing aid in the contralateral ear be recommended for children with a unilateral cochlear implant? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008;117:397-403.