Demet BAYRAKTAR, A. Mesut KOCAMAN, M. Esat MUTLU, M. Özgür ARAZ

4821

Oecd ülkelerinin sağlık sistemlerinin etkinlik analizi

OECD üye ülkelerinin Gayri Safi Yurt İçi Hasılalarının (GSYİH) ortalama olarak %9,8’ini harcadıkları sağlık hizmetleri ve sistemlerinin yönetiminde, kaynakların etkin kullanımı kilit rol oynamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, kapsamlı bir literatür araştırmasıyla girdi ve çıktı değişkenleri belirlendikten sonra, en güncel sağlık verileri kullanılarak Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) ile OECD üyesi 34 ülkenin sağlık alanındaki etkinlikleri değerlendirilmiştir. Değerlendirilmelerde yaşanabilecek eksik yorumlamaların önüne geçebilmek için Pierce Kriteri kullanılarak yapılan eleme süreciyle ülke sayısı 22’ye indirilmiş ve bu ülkeler tekrar değerlendirilmiştir. 34 ülke arasından 10 ülke etkin olarak kaydedilirken, yeni değerlendirmede 22 ülke içinden sadece yedi ülke etkin olarak belirlenmiştir. Son olarak, değerlendirilmelerde dikkat edilmesi gereken noktalar ve ileriye dönük olarak yapılabilecek iyileştirmeler tartışılmıştır.

Health care sytem efficiency analysis of oecd countries

Efficient use of resources plays a key role in health sector management and health care costs in Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) member countries account approximately for 9.8% of their GDP. In this paper, after determining the input and output variables from an extensive literature study and using the most recent health care data available, health care efficiency of 34 OECD members are evaluated via Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In order to avoid any missing interpretation during the evaluation process, number of countries is initially reduced to 22 based on an elimination process by using Pierce's Criterion, and these countries are re-evaluated. 10 countries out of 34 are listed as efficient, while only seven states in 22 were found efficient in the re-evaluation process. Lastly, points of interest on reviews and prospective improvements are stated.
PDF

___

  • 1. Afonso, A., Aubyn, M. 2005. “Non-Parametric Approaches to Education and Health Efficiency in OECD Count- ries,” Journal of Applied Economics, 8 (3), 227-246.
  • 2. Afonso, A., Aubyn, M., 2006. “Relative Efficiency of Health Provision: A DEA Approach With Non-Discretionary Inputs”, Working Papers, Department of Economics At The School Of Economics And Management (ISEG), Technical University of Lisbon.
  • 3. Al-Shammari, M., 1999. “A Multi-Criteria Data Envelop- ment Analysis Model for Measuring The Productive Efficiency of Hospitals,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19 (9), 879-890.
  • 4. Banker, R.D., Thrall, R.M. 1992. “Estimation of Returns to Scale Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 62 (2), 74-84.
  • 5. Bhagavath, V. 2002. “Technical Efficiency Measurement By Data Envelopment Analysis: an Application in Trans- portation,” Alliance Journal of Business Research, 2 (1), 60-72.
  • 6. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G., Thanassoulis, E. 1991. “Applied Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal Of Operational Research, 52 (1), 1-15.
  • 7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhones, E. 1978. “Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” Europan Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
  • 8. Chu Ng, Y. 2008. “The Productive Efficiency of The Health Care Sector of China,” The Review of Regional Studies, 38 (3), 381-393.
  • 9. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L., Tone, K. 2007. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References and DEA Solver Software, Springer, New York.
  • 10. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L., Zhu, J. 2004. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Springer, New York.
  • 11. Gonçalves, A., Noronha, C., Lins, M., Almeida, R. 2007. “Data Envelopment Analysis For Evaluating Public Hospitals İn Brazilian State Capitals,” Rev Saúde Pública,41 (3), 1-8.
  • 12. Mirmirani, S., Lippmann, M. 2003. “Health Care System Efficiency Analysis of G12 Countries,” International Business & Economics Research Journal, 3 (5), 35-42.
  • 13. OECD, 2001. OECD Strategies for Sustainable Development, France.
  • 14. Ray, S.C. 2004. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research, Cambridge University Press, UK.
  • 15. Ross, S.M. 2003. “Peirce’s Criterion for The Elimination of Suspect Experimental Data,” Journal of Engineering Technolog, 20 (2), 1-12.
  • 16. Spinks, J., Hollingsworth, B. 2005. “Health Production And The Socioeconomic Determinants of Health in OECD Countries: The Use of Efficiency Models,” Working Paper, Centre For Health Economics, Monash University.
  • 17. Tandon, A. 2005. Measuring Efficiency of Macro Systems: An Application to Millennium Development Goal Attainment, Asian Development Bank, Phillippines.
  • 18. Tandon, A., Evans, D.B., Murray, C.J., Lauer, J.A. 2001. “The Comparative Efficiency of National Health Systems in Producing Health: An Analysis of 191 Countries,” Global Programme On Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper No:29, World Health Organization.
  • 19. Thanassoulis, E. 2001. Introduction to The Theory And Application pf Data Envelopment Analysis, Springer.
  • 20. UNPFA, 2011. The State of World Population 2011, New York, USA.
  • 21. WHO, 2000. The World Health Report 2000 Health Systems: Improving Performance, France.
  • 22. WHO, 2011. World Health Statistics 2011, France.
  • 23. Zhang, N., Hu, A., Zheng, J. 2007. “Using Data Envelopment Analysis Approach To Estimate The Health Production Efficiencies İn China,” Frontiers of Economics in China, 2 (1), 1-23.
Endüstri Mühendisliği-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-3410
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1989
  • Yayıncı: TMMOB MAKİNA MÜHENDİSLERİ ODASI
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

An analytical comparison of random and exhaustive search of an expandıng ares with binary sensors

Mümtaz KARATAŞ

Oecd ülkelerinin sağlık sistemlerinin etkinlik analizi

Demet BAYRAKTAR, A. Mesut KOCAMAN, M. Esat MUTLU, M. Özgür ARAZ

Türkiye’de yöneylem araştırması: Sistem bilimleri araştırma enstitüsü (SİBAREN)

Haldun SÜRAL, Halim DOĞRUSÖZ