Gülser KÖKSAL, A. Sermet ANAGÜN, Aktar Ezgi DEMİRTAŞ

185

Mutfak armatürü tasarımının kullanıcıların görsel algılarına göre lojistik regresyon yoluyla belirlenmesi

Yapılan çalışmada, mutfak armatürü tasarımında kullanıcı hislerini analiz ederek tasarım sürecine dahil etmek ve kullanıcıların görsel algılarına göre tasarım niteliklerinin düzeylerini eniyilemek üzere iki aşamalı bir yaklaşım önerilmiş ve uygulanmıştır. İlk aşamada kullanıcıların 38 farklı mutfak armatürünü, görsel algıları ölçmede kullanılan 11 kansei sözcüğüne göre bir anlamsal farklılıklar ölçeğinde değerlendirmeleri istenmiştir. Elde edilen verilerden hareketle kullanıcıların genel tercih puanları ile kansei sözcük puanları arasındaki ilişki Doğrusal Regresyon ve Sıralı Lojistik Regresyon (SLOGREG) kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. İkinci aşamada, kullanıcıların genel tercih puanlarını enbüyükleyen tasarım düzeyleri SLOGREG ile belirlenerek doğrulama çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Yapılan çalışma; kullanıcı odaklı ürün tasarımında kullanabilecek etkili bir yaklaşım önermekte ve bu yaklaşımı mutfak armatürlerinin tasarımı üzerinde göstermektedir.

Sink mixer design for visual perceptions of users by logistic regression

In this study; a two-stage integrated approach is proposed and implemented to explore user senses about sink mixers and optimization of design levels for visual perceptions. At the first stage, users have been asked to judge 38 different mixer designs by using a semantic differential (SD) scale for 11 image (kansei) words about their visual perceptions. Then the relationships between general preference and kansei scores of users are investigated by Linear Regression and Ordinal Logistic Regression (OLOGREG). At the second stage; the best design parameter levels for visual perceptions are determined to maximize general preference scores by OLOGREG, and the results are validated. This study proposes an approach that can be used for user centered product design in general and demonstrates it for the design of sink mixers.
PDF

___

  • 1. Chuang, M.C., Chang, C.C., Hsu, S. H. 2001. “Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 247-258.
  • 2. Chuang, M.C., Mab Y.C. 2001. “Expressing the expected product images in product design of micro-electronic products”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 233-245.
  • 3. Creusen, M.E.H., Schoormans, J.P.L. 2005. “The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 63-81.
  • 4. Erdural, S. 2006. A Method for Robust Design of Products or Processes with Categorical Response, METU, Ankara.
  • 5. Han, S.H., Yun, M.H., Kim, K.J., Kwank, J. 2000. “Evaluation of product usability: development and validation of usability dimensions and design elements based on empirical models”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26 (4), 477-488.
  • 6. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression (2nd edition), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • 7. Hsiao, K.A., Chen, L.L. 2006. “Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 553-564.
  • 8. Hsiao, S.W., Huang, H.C. 2002. “A neural network based approach for product form design”, Design Studies, 23, 67-84.
  • 9. Hsiao, S.W., Tsai, H.C. 2005. “Applying a hybrid approach based on fuzzy neural network and genetic algorithm to product form design”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35 (5), 411-428.
  • 10. Hsu, S.H., Chuang, M.C., Chang, C.C. 2000. “A semantic diferential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25, 375-391.
  • 11. Jindo, T., Hirasago, K. 1997. “Application studies to car interior of Kansei engineering”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 105-114.
  • 12. Karlsson, B.S.A., Aronsson, N., Sevensson, K.A. 2003. “Using semantic environment description as a tool to evaluate car interiors”, Ergonomics, 46 (13-14), 1408- 1422.
  • 13. Khalid, H.M., Helander, M.G. 2004. “A framework for affective customer needs in product design”, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics, 5 (1), 27-42.
  • 14. Khalid, H.M., Helander, M.G. 2006. “Customer emotional needs in product design”, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application, 14 (3), 197-206.
  • 15. Kim, J., Lee, J., Choi, D. 2003. “Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotianal dimensions”, International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 59, 899-940.
  • 16. Kish, L. 1995. Survey Sampling, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • 17. Kwon, K.S. 1999. “Human sensibility ergonomics in product design”, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3 (1), 51-62. “
  • 18. Lai, H.H., Lin, Y.C., Yeh, C.H. 2005. “Form design of product image using grey relational analysis and neural network models”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 32, 2689-2711.
  • 19. Lai, H.H., Lin, Y.C., Yeh, C.H., Wei, C.H. 2006. “User- oriented design for the optimal combination on product design”, International Journal of Production Economics, 100 (2), 253-267.
  • 20. Liu, Y. 2003. “Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: theoritical foundations and dual process research methodology”, Ergonomics, 46 (13-14), 1273- 1292.
  • 21. Malhotra, N.K. 1996. Marketing Research, An Applied Orientation, Prentice Hall International, Georgia Institute of Technology.
  • 22. Nagamachi, M. 1995. “Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 3-11.
  • 23. Nakada, K. 1997. “Kansei engineering research on the design of construction machinery”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 129-146.
  • 24. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning, Champagne, University of Ilinois Press.
  • 25. Özdamar, K. 2005. Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi (Çok Değişkenli Analizler), 5. Basım, Etam A.Ş., Eskişehir.
  • 26. Phadke, M. 1989. Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  • 27. Shütte, S. 2002. Integrating Kansei Engineering Methodology in Product Development, Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Sweden.
  • 28. Yun, M.H., Han, S.H., Kim, K.J., Han, S. 1999. “Measuring customer perceptions on product usability: development of image and impression attributes of consumer electronic products”, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Texas, 486-490.
  • 29. Zhang, L., Shen, W. 1999. Sensory Evaluation of Commercial Truck Interiors, SAE Technical Paper Series, Michigan.
Endüstri Mühendisliği-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-3410
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1989
  • Yayıncı: TMMOB MAKİNA MÜHENDİSLERİ ODASI
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Mutfak armatürü tasarımının kullanıcıların görsel algılarına göre lojistik regresyon yoluyla belirlenmesi

Gülser KÖKSAL, A. Sermet ANAGÜN, Aktar Ezgi DEMİRTAŞ

Güneş enerjisi ve led ile etkin enerji kullanımı: Yol aydınlatmalarına yönelik bir uygulama

Tayfun ÇAYLAN, Türsel Deniz ELİİYİ