___

• Adar T. ve Delice E. (2019). New integrated approaches based on MC-HFLTS for healthcare waste treatment technology selection, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32 (4), 688-711. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2018-0235
• Adem, A., Kaya, B. Y. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2021) Analyzing The OHS Risks Emerged in Transportation of Medical Materials in The Covid-19 Pandemic. 19th International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress, 348-358, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
• Adem, A., Yilmaz Kaya, B. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2022). Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Aviation 4.0. Studies in Systems: Decision and control technology analysis for Logistics 4.0 applications: Criteria affecting UAV performances. Springer, Cham. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75067-1_21
• Adriaensen, A., Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G. ve Patriarca, R. (2022). Teaming with industrial cobots: A socio‐technical perspective on safety analysis. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 32(2), 173-198. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20939 .
• Al-Hamouz, S. O. El-Omari, N. K. ve Al-Naimat, A. M. (2019) An ISO compliant safety system for human workers in human-robot interaction work environment, 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE). 9-14, Kazan, Rusya, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/DeSE.2019.00012
• Ashtiani, M. ve Azgomi, M. A. (2016). A hesitant fuzzy model of computational trust considering hesitancy, vagueness and uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing, 42, 18-37. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.023.
• Ayyıldız, E. (2021). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based green supply chain resilience evaluation methodology in post COVID-19 era. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 42476–42494. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16972-y
• Borboni, A., Elamvazuthi, I. ve Cusano, N. (2022). EEG-Based Empathic Safe Cobot. Machines, 10(8), 603. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10080603
• Bortolini, M., Faccio, M., Gamberi, M ve Pilati, F. (2020). Motion Analysis System (MAS) for production and ergonomics assessment in the manufacturing processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 105485. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.046
• Bortolini, M., Ferrari, E., Gamberi, M., Pilati, F. ve Faccio, M. (2017). Assembly system design in the Industry 4.0 era: a general framework. Ifac-Papersonline, 50(1), 5700-5705. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1121
• Bozkuş, E., Kaya, İ ve Yakut, M. (2022). A fuzzy based model proposal on risk analysis for human-robot interactive systems. International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA). 1-6. IEEE. Erişim adresi: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/ stamp.jsp?arnumber=9799820.
• Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O. ve Göçer, F. (2018). Selection of sustainable urban transportation alternatives using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 58, 186-207. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.005
• Can G. F. ve Delice E. (2018). A Task-Based Fuzzy İntegrated Mcdm Approach For Shopping Mall Selection Considering Universal Design Criteria. Soft Computing, 22(22), 7377-7397. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3074-4
• Can, G. F. (2018). An intutionistic approach based on failure mode and effect analysis for prioritizing corrective and preventive strategies. Human Factors And Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28(3), 130-147. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20729
• Caterino, M., Rinaldi, M., & Fera, M. (2023). Digital ergonomics: an evaluation framework for the ergonomic risk assessment of heterogeneous workers. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 36(2), 239-259. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2022.2090023
• Chander, G. P. ve Das, S. (2023). Hesitant T-spherical fuzzy linear regression model based decision making approach using gradient descent method. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 122, 106074. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106074
• Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M. ve Chakraborty, S. (2010). Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26(5), 483–489. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.007
• Chromjakova, F., Trentesaux, D. ve Kwarteng, M. A. (2021). Human and cobot cooperation ethics: The process management concept of the production workplace. Journal of Competitiveness. 13(3), 21-38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.03.02
• Cohen, Y. Naseraldin, H. Chaudhuri, A. ve Pilati, F. (2019). Assembly systems in Industry 4.0 era: a road map to understand Assembly 4.0, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 105, 4037–4054, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04203-1.
• Colgate, J. E., Wannasuphoprasit, W. ve Peshkin, M. A. (1996). Cobots: Robots for collaboration with human operators. ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. 55, 433-439, Atlanta. Erişim adresi: https://peshkin.mech.northwestern.edu/publications/1996_Colgate_CobotsRobotsCollaboration.pdf.
• Dalay, M. ve Sarı, K. (2022). Tedarikçi Seçiminde Yeşil Kriterin Öneminin Araştırılması: Türk Gıda Sektörü Örneği. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 33 (3) , 500-513 . Doi: https://doi.org/10.46465/endustrimuhendisligi.1152540
• de Man, J. C. ve Strandhagen, J. O. (2017). An Industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models. Procedia CIRP, 63, 721-726. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.315
• Dede, G. Mitropoulou, P. Nikolaidou, M. Kamalakis T. ve Michalakelis, C. (2020). Safety requirements for symbiotic human–robot collaboration systems in smart factories: a pairwise comparison approach to explore requirements dependencies. Requirements Engineering. 26(1), 115-141. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-020-00337-x
• Dekker, F., Salomons, A. ve Waal, J. V. D. (2017). Fear of robots at work: the role of economic self-interest. Socio-Economic Review, 15(3), 539-562. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx005
• Delice E. ve Zegerek S. (2016). Ranking occupational risk levels of emergency departments using a new fuzzy mcdm model: A case study in Turkey, Applied Mathematics And Information Sciences.10(6), 2345-2356. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/100638
• Deng, X., Li, W. ve Liu, Y. (2022). Hesitant fuzzy portfolio selection model with score and novel hesitant semi-variance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 164, 107879. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107879
• Devi, K. (2011). Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection.Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14163-14168. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.227
• Dilibal, S. ve Şahin, H. (2018). İşbirlikçi endüstriyel robotlar ve dijital endüstri. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 2(1), 86-96. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/435679.
• Djuric, A. M., Urbanic, R. J. ve Rickli, J. L. (2016). A framework for collaborative robot (CoBot) integration in advanced manufacturing systems. SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 9(2), 457-464. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0337
• Dong, M., Li, S. ve Zhang, H. (2015). Approaches to group decision making with incomplete information based on power geometric operators and triangular fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7846-7857. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.007
• Eski, Ö. ve Uzun Araz, Ö. (2021). İyileştirme Projelerinin Bulanık Vikor Yöntemi İle Değerlendirilmesi. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 32 (3), 473-495. Erişim adresi : Https://Dergipark.Org.Tr/Tr/Pub/Endustrimuhendisligi/İssue/66238/955025
• Fang, B. (2023). Some uncertainty measures for probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. Information Sciences. 625, 255-276, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.12.101
• Fast-Berglund, Å. Palmkvist, F. Nyqvist, P. Ekered S. ve Åkerman, M. (2016) Evaluating cobots for final assembly, Procedia CIRP. 44, 175–180, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.114
• Fournier, É., Kilgus, D., Landry, A., Hmedan, B., Pellier, D., Fiorino, H. ve Jeoffrion, C. (2022). The impacts of human-cobot collaboration on perceived cognitive load and usability during an industrial task: an exploratory experiment. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 10(2), 83-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2022.2072021
• Garg, K., Pawar, P., Gosavi, J., Sharan N. ve More J. (2021). Industry 4.0 Integration with Industrial Engineering. 1st Indian International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bangalore, India. Erişim adresi: https://www.ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2021india/215.pdf.
• Ghorabaee, M. K. (2016). Developing an MCDM method for robot selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 37, 221-232. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.04.007
• Gil-Vilda, F., Sune, A., Yagüe-Fabra, J. A., Crespo, C. ve Serrano, H. (2017). Integration of a collaborative robot in a U-shaped production line: a real case study. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 109-115. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.015
• Guiochet, J., Machin, M. ve Waeselynck, H. (2017). Safety-critical advanced robots: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 94, 43-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.04.004
• Guleria, A. ve Bajaj, R. K. (2020). T-spherical fuzzy graphs: operations and applications in various selection processes. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(3), 2177-2193. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04107-y
• Gül, S. (2021). Fermatean fuzzy set extensions of SAW, ARAS, and VIKOR with applications in COVID‐19 testing laboratory selection problem. Expert Systems, 38(8), e12769. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12769.
• Gül, S. (2021). Hastane Yeri Seçiminde Nesnel Ağırlıklandırmalı Sezgisel Bulanık Vıkor Yöntemi. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 32(2), 177-200. Doi: https://doi.org/10.46465/endustrimuhendisligi.795479
• Hanna, A. Bengtsson, K. Götvall P. -L. ve Ekström, M. (2020). Towards safe human robot collaboration - Risk assessment of intelligent automation, 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), 424-431, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA46521.2020.9212127
• Hata, A., Inam, R., Raizer, K., Wang, S. ve Cao, E. (2019). AI-based safety analysis for collaborative mobile robots. 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). 1722-1729. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869263
• Hentout, A. Aouache, M. Maoudj, A. ve Akli, (2019). I. Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017, Adv. Robot. 33, (15–16), 1–36, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/08/19/1903451/0/en/Digital-Transformation-in-Manufacturing-Market-to-hit-642-35-billion-by-2025-Analysis-by-Technology-and-Innovation-Landscape-Key-Initiatives-Case-Studies-and-Vendor-Outlook-Adroit-.html : “Technology and Innovation Landscape, Key Initiatives, Case Studies and Vendor Outlook: Adroit Market Research”
• ISO 10218 “Robots and robotic devices – Safety requirements for industrial robots”, with parts 1 (“Robots”) and 2 (“Robot systems and integration”), ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, 2011.
• ISO/TS 15066, “Robots and robotic devices - Collaborative robots,” 2016.
• URL:https://www.sis.se/en/produkter/manufacturing-engineering/industrial-automation-systems/industrial-robots-manipulators/isots150662016 .
• Jiao, H. (2020). Selection of resettlement site in reservoir construction using Pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA multi-criteria decision-making method. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 502-505. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI115-138.1
• Johansson, A., Christiernin, L. G. ve Pejryd, L. (2016). Manufacturing system design for business value, a holistic design approach. Procedia CIRP, 50, 659-664. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.140
• Kasap, S. S. , Şahin, Y. ve Çınar, T. (2020). Bulanık Tabanlı Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri İle Demirçelik Endüstrisinde En Uygun Yatırım Seçeneğinin Belirlenmesi. Endüstri Mühendisliği, I.EİM Kongresi, 59-71. Erişim adresi : https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/endustrimuhendisligi/issue/52861/641077
• Keršuliené, V., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243-258. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem. 2010.12
• Kim, W. Peternel, L. Lorenzini, M. Babič J. ve Ajoudani, A. (2021). A Human-Robot Collaboration Framework for Improving Ergonomics During Dexterous Operation of Power Tools, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 68, 102084, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102084
• Koch, P. J., van Amstel, M. K., Dębska, P., Thormann, M. A., Tetzlaff, A. J., Bøgh, S. ve Chrysostomou, D. (2017). A Skill-based Robot Co-worker for Industrial Maintenance Tasks. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 83-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.141
• Komenda, T., Schmidbauer, C., Kames, D. ve Schlund, S. (2021). Learning to share-teaching the impact of flexible task allocation in human-cobot teams. Conference on Learning Factories (CLF). Graz, Avusturya. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3869551
• Kopp, T. Baumgartner, M. ve Kinkel, S. (2021) Success factors for introducing industrial human–robot interaction in practice: an empirically driven framework, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 112, 685–704, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06398-0
• Lee, H. J., Kim, J. S. ve Kim, H. W. (2019). Analysis of artificial intelligence technology based on the requirements of collaborative robots through patent analysis. ICIC Express Letters, 13(6), 521-527. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24507/icicel.13.06.521.
• Liu, B., Fu, W., Wang, W., Li, R., Gao, Z., Peng, L. ve Du, H. (2022) Cobot Motion Planning Algorithm for Ensuring Human Safety Based on Behavioral Dynamics. Sensors, 22, 4376. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124376.
• Liu, Z., Wang, X., Cai, Y., Xu, W., Liu, Q., Zhou, Z. ve Pham, D. T. (2020). Dynamic risk assessment and active response strategy for industrial human-robot collaboration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 141, 106302. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106302
• Ly, P. T. M., Lai, W. H., Hsu, C. W. ve Shih, F. Y. (2018). Fuzzy AHP analysis of Internet of Things (IoT) in enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(C), 1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.016
• Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006.
• McClure, P. K. (2018). “You’re fired,” says the robot: The rise of automation in the workplace, technophobes, and fears of unemployment. Social Science Computer Review, 36(2), 139-156. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317698637.
• Mo, H. (2021). A SWOT method to evaluate safety risks in life cycle of wind turbine extended by D number theory. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(3), 4439-4452. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-201277.
• Nordander, C., Ohlsson, K., Balogh, I., Hansson, G-A ̊, Axmon, A., Persson, R. ve Skerfving, S. (2008). Gender differences in workers with identical repetitive industrial tasks: exposure and musculoskeletal disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81:939–94. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0286-9.
• Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12983-12990. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097 Otto, A. ve Scholl, A. (2013). Reducing ergonomic risks by job rotation scheduling. OR spectrum, 35, 711-733. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-012-0291-6.
• Özcan, S. G. , Yıldızbası, A. ve Eraslan, E. (2019). İnşaat Firmalarının İSG Bağlamında Bulanık Grup Karar Verme Yaklaşımı ile Değerlendirilmesi. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 30(3), 204-219. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/endustrimuhendisligi/issue/50398/606553
• Paliga, M. (2022). Human–cobot interaction fluency and cobot operators’ job performance. The mediating role of work engagement: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 155, 104191. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104191.
• Pant, M. ve Kumar, S. (2022). Particle swarm optimization and intuitionistic fuzzy set-based novel method for fuzzy time series forecasting. Granular Computing, 7(2), 285-303. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00265-3.
• Papetti, A., Ciccarelli, M., Scoccia, C. ve Germani, M. (2021). A multi-criteria method to design the collaboration between humans and robots. Procedia CIRP, 104, 939-944. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.158
• Parameshwaran, R., Kumar, S. P. ve Saravanakumar, K. (2015). An integrated fuzzy MCDM based approach for robot selection considering objective and subjective criteria. Applied Soft Computing, 26, 31-41. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.09.025.
• Park, K. C. ve Shin, D. H. (2017). Security assessment framework for IoT service, Telecommunication Systems, 64(1), 193-209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0168-0 .
• Peng, X. ve Yang, Y. (2015). Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 30(11), 1133-1160. Doi: 10.1002/int.21738.
• Peng, X. ve Yuan, H. (2016). Fundamental properties of Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Fundamenta Informaticae, 147(4), 415-446. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21790 .
• Perçin, S. (2023). Identifying barriers to big data analytics adoption in circular agri-food supply chains: a case study in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-17. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26091-5
• Putz-Anderson, V., Bernard, B. P., Burt, S. E., Cole, L. L., Fairfield-Estill, C., Fine, L. J., Grant, K.A., Gjessing, C., Jenkins, L., Hurrell Jr., J.J., Nelson, N., Pfirman, D., Roberts, R., Stetson, D., Haring-Sweeney, M. ve Tanaka, S. (1997). Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 104, 97-141. Erişim adresi: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/97-141/pdfs/97-141.pdf?id=10.26616/ NIOSHPUB97141.
• Rezagholi, M. ve Bantekas, A. (2015). Making economic social decisions for improving occupational health a predictive cost-benefit analysis. Occupational Medicine & Health Affairs. 3(06), 1000225, Doi: https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6879.1000225.
• Savaş, E. (2016). On Generalized Double Statistical Convergence of Order α in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Normed Spaces. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 21(3), 36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/mca21030036.
• Schou, C., Andersen, R.S., Chrysostomou, D., Bøgh, S. Ve Madsen, O. (2018). Skill-based instruction of collaborative robots in industrial settings, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 53 72–80, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2018.03.008
• Scimmi, L. S., Melchiorre, M., Troise, M., Mauro, S. ve Pastorelli, S. (2021). A practical and effective layout for a safe human-robot collaborative assembly task. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1763. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041763 .
• Sharaf, I. M. ve Khalil, E. A. H. A. (2021). A spherical fuzzy TODIM approach for green occupational health and safety equipment supplier selection. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 16(1), 1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2020.1788467.
• Sriviboon, Y., & Jiamsanguanwong, A. Usability Evaluation and User Acceptance of Cobot: Case Study of Universal Robots CB Series. The International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Istanbul, Türkiye. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420161.
• Sumrit, D. (2020). Supplier selection for vendor-managed inventory in healthcare using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Decision Science Letters, 9, 233–256. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2019.10.002.
• Sun, C. C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert systems with applications, 37(12), 7745-7754. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066 .
• Veza, I., Mladineo, M., Kutlesa, M., Gjeldum, N., Bilic, B., Crnjac Zizic, M., Alinovic, A. ve Basic, A. (2022). Selection of the Cobot Workstation for the Learning Factory by using the Multi-Criteria Analysis. 12th Conference on Learning Factories, CLF2022, Singapur. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072387
• Virgillito, M. E. (2017). Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future, Labor History, 58(2), 240-242.
• Vitolo, F., Rega, A., Di Marino, C., Pasquariello, A., Zanella, A. ve Patalano, S. (2022). Mobile Robots and Cobots Integration: A Preliminary Design of a Mechatronic Interface by Using MBSE Approach. Applied Sciences, 12(1), 419. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010419.
• Vysocky, A. ve Novak, P. (2016). Human-robot collaboration in industry. MM Science Journal, 9(2), 903-906. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2016_06_201611
• Yener, Y. ve Can, G. F. (2021). A FMEA based novel intuitionistic fuzzy approach proposal: Intuitionistic fuzzy advance MCDM and mathematical modeling integration. Expert Systems with Applications, 183, 115413. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115413.
• Yılmaz, B. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2010) Comparative analysis of PROMETHEE and fuzzy PROMETHEE methods in equipment selection problem. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 25(4). Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gazimmfd/issue/6686/88606.
• Yılmaz, B. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2011). A combined approach for equipment selection: F-PROMETHEE method and zero–one goal programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11641-11650. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.043.
• Yılmaz Kaya, B. (2022). Human factors engineerıng on the edge of Industry 4.0: Analysis for IoT-Aided technologies. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 33(1), 1-21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.46465/endustrimuhendisligi.1025701.
• Yılmaz Kaya, B. (2022). Contemplation and analysis of pandemic impacts on accommodation industry and a system reformulation proposal with Kano model: Turkey case. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(8), 1226-1241. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.2007860
• Yılmaz Kaya, B. (2022). Minimizing OHS Risks with Spherical Fuzzy Sets as a Verdict to Inventory Management: A Case Regarding Energy Companies. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 9511339. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9511339.
• Yılmaz Kaya, B. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2016). Selecting occupational safety equipment by MCDM approach considering universal design principles. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(2), 224-242. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20625
• Yılmaz Kaya, B. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2017) A fuzzy marketing strategy benchmarking analysis in service sector. The 5th International Fuzzy Systems Symposium, TOBB-ETU, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Yılmaz Kaya, B. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2019). A guiding analysis to accomplish the challenges for implementation of Industry 4.0. 10th International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Service Systems, 738-746, Sakarya, Türkiye.
• Yılmaz Kaya, B., Adem, A. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2018). A human centered multi-criteria decision making approach proposition for priorization of ergonomic factors in terms of working productivity. The 12th International Conference on New Challenges in Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Yılmaz Kaya, B., Adem, A. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2021). A Multi-criteria Approach to Usability Research for Digital Platforms in Fuzzy Environment. INFUS 2021 Conference, August 24-26, 2021. 417-425, İstanbul, Türkiye.
• Yılmaz Kaya, B., Adem, A. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2022). Dijital ergonomi, akıllı fabrikalar ve işbirlikçi robot uygulamaları. 28. Ulusal Ergonomi Kongresi, 14-16 Ekim, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
• Yücesan, M. ve Gül, M. (2020). Hospital service quality evaluation: An integrated model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Soft Computing, 24(5), 3237-3255. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04084-2.
• Zacharaki, A., Kostavelis, I., Gasteratos, A. ve Dokas, I. (2020). Safety bounds in human robot interaction: A survey. Safety science, 127, 104667. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104667.
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
• Zhang, Z. (2016). Some hesitant multiplicative aggregation operators and their application in group decision making with hesitant multiplicative preference relations. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 18(2), 177-197. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0158-0.