Hilal KARABULUT, Gül ŞENDİL

153

ANNELİK BEKÇİLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN (ABÖ) TÜRKÇE’YE UYARLANMASI

Bu çalışmanın amacı, çocuklarının babalarına erişimini kısıtlayan anneleri değerlendirebilmek için Fagan ve Barnett (2003) tarafından geliştirilen Annelik Bekçiliği Ölçeği'nin (ABÖ) Türkçe'ye uyarlanmasıdır. Orijinal çalışmanın katılımcıları, 3-16 yaş aralığında en az bir çocuğu olan, çocuğu annesiyle ya da hem annesi hem de babasıyla birlikte yaşayan ailelerdeki annelerden oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın katılımcıları ise, lise birinci ya da ikinci sınıfa devam eden 136 çocuğun babasıdır. Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 45.5'tir (SS=5.9). Çalışmanın geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri, uyarlanan Annelik Bekçiliği Ölçeği'nin (ABÖ) yeterli düzeyde psikometrik özelliklere sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Katılımcıların ABÖ puan ortalamaları, bazı demografik değişkenlere göre de (anne-baba eğitim düzeyi, ekonomik durum, anne-baba çalışma biçimi, çocuk cinsiyeti, anne yaşı) incelenmiştir

TURKISH ADAPTATION OF THE MATERNAL GATEKEEPING SCALE

The purpose of the present study was to make the adaptation of the Maternal Gatekeeping Scale for use in Turkey, which was developed by Fagan and Barnett (2003) to assess that mothers restricting access of their children to the fathers. The participants of the original study had at least one child who was between the ages of 3 and 16 years living with the mother or with the mother and father. But the participants of this study are 136 fathers who have first or second grade high school children. Participant’s mean of age was 45.5 (SD=5.9). The validity and reliability analyses in this study showed that adaptation of Maternal Gatekeeping Scale has sufficient level of psychometric properties. Participants’ mean of Maternal Gatekeeping Scale scores were also investigated according to some demographic characteristics (parents’ educational level, economic condition, parents’ way of work, sex of children, age of mother)
PDF

___

  • Allen, S. M. ve Hawkins, A. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 199-212.
  • Austin, W. G., Fieldstone, L. ve Pruett, M. K. (2013). Bench book for assessing parental gatekeeping in parenting disputes: understanding the dynamics of gate closing and opening for the best interests of children. Journal of Child Custody, 10, 1-16.4.
  • Cabrera, N., Fitzgerald, H., E., Bradley, R. H., & Roggman, L. (2007). Modeling the dynamics of paternal influences on children over the life course. Applied Development Science, 11(4), 185-189.
  • Cowan, C. P. ve Cowan, P. A. (1987). Men’s involvement in parenthood: identifying the antecedents and understanding the barriers. Phyllis W. Berman ve Frank A. Pedersan (Eds.), Men’s Transitions to Parenthood: Longitudinal Studies of Early Family Experience içinde (s. 145-174). Hillsdalei, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • DeLuccie, M. F. (1995). Mothers as gatekeepers: a model of maternal mediators of father involvement. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156(1), 115-131.
  • Downer, J., Campos, R., McWayne, C., & Gartner, T. (2008). Father involvement and children’s early learning: a critical review of published empirical work from the past 15 years. Marriage & Family Review, 43(1/2), 67-108.
  • Fagan, J. ve Barnett, M. (2003). The relationship between maternal gatekeeping, paternal competence, mothers’ attitudes about the father role, and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 24(8), 1020-1043.
  • Gaunt, R. (2008). Maternal gatekeeping: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Family Issues, 29(3), 373-395.
  • Hauser, O. (2012). Pushing daddy away? A qualitative study of maternal gatekeeping. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8(1), 35-59.
  • Hawkins, A. J. ve Dollahite, D. C. (1997). Beyond the role-inadequacy perspective of fathering. Alan J. Hawkins ve David C. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives içinde (s. 3-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Herzog, M. J., Umana-Taylor, A. J., Madden-Derdich, D. A. ve Leonard, S. A. (2007). Adolescent mothers’ perceptions of fathers’ parental involvement: satisfaction and desire for involvement. Family Relations, 56, 244-257.
  • Kulik, L. ve Sadeh, I. (2015). Explaining fathers’ involvement in childcare: an ecological approach. Community, Work & Family, 18(1), 19-40.
  • Kulik, L. ve Tsoref, H. (2010). The entrance to the maternal garden: environmental and personal variables that explain maternal gatekeeping. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(3), 263-277.
  • Makusha, T. ve Richter, L. (2016). Gatekeeping and its impact on father involvement among black south africans in rural kwazulu-natal. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(3), 308-320.
  • McBride, B. A., Brown, G. L., Bost, K. K., Shin, N., Vaughn, B. ve Korth B. (2005). Paternal identity, maternal gatekeeping, and father involvement. Family Relations, 54(3), 360-372.
  • McBride, B. A., Schoppe, S. J., Ho, M. H., & Rane, T. R. (2004). Multiple determinants of father involvement: an exploratory analysis using the PSID-CDS data set. Randal. D. Day ve Michael E. Lamb (Eds.), Conceptualizing and Measuring Father Involvement içinde (s. 321-340). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Parke, R. D. (1995). Fathers and families. Marc H. Bornstein, (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting Volume 3 Status and Social Conditions of Parenting içinde (s. 27-63). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Parke, R. D. (2000). ‘Father Involvement: A Developmental Psychological Perspective. Marriage & Family Review, 29(2/3), 43-58.
  • Parke, R. D., Coltrane, S., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Powers, J., Adams, M., Fabricius, W., Braver, S. ve Saenz, D. (2004). Assessing father involvement in Mexican-American families.
  • Randal. D. Day ve Michael E. Lamb (Eds.), Conceptualizing And Measuring Father Involvement içinde (s. 17-38). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Pedersen, F. A., Zaslow, M. J., Cain R. L., Suwalsky, J. T. D. ve Rabinovich, B. (1987). Fatherinfant interaction among men who had contrasting affective responses during early infancy: Follow-up observations at 1 year. Phyllis W. Berman ve Frank A. Pedersan (Eds.), Men’s Transitions to Parenthood: Longitudinal Studies of Early Family Experience içinde (s. 65-87). Hillsdalei, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Puhlman, D. J. ve Pasley, K. (2013). Rethinking maternal gatekeeping. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 176-193.
  • Shoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Altenburger, L. E., Lee, M. A., Bower, D. J. ve Dush, C. M. K. (2015). Who are the gatekeepers? Predictors of maternal gatekeeping. Parenting: Science and Practice, 15, 166-186.
  • Schope-Sullivan, S. J., Brown, G. L., Cannon, E. A., Mangelsdorf, S. C. ve Sokolowski, M. S. (2008). Maternal gatekeeping, coparenting quality, and fathering behavior in families with infants. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 389-398.
  • Trinder, L. (2008). Maternal gate closing and gate opening in postdivorce families. Journal of Family Issues, 29(10), 1298-1324.
  • Tu, Y. C., Chang, J. C. ve Kao, T. F. (2014). A study on the relationships between maternal gatekeeping and paternal involvement in taiwan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 319-328.
Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik)-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Cahit AYDEMİR
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ANNELİK BEKÇİLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN (ABÖ) TÜRKÇE’YE UYARLANMASI

Hilal KARABULUT, Gül ŞENDİL

PRESCHOOL CHILDREN'S VERBAL COMMUNICATION WITHIN TWO DIFFERENT CLASSROOM SETTING1

Zübeyde DOĞAN ALTUN, Ithel JONES

LOJİSTİK REGRESYON YÖNTEMİ İLE AYVALIĞI TURİZM AMAÇLI TERCİH ETMEDE ÖNEMLİ RİSK FAKTÖRLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Orhan ŞAHİN

DISTANCE LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES FOR POSTGRADUATE STUDIES OF SEAFARING OFFICERS

Ergün DEMIREL