Farzad HABIBI, Farshad KHOSRAVI, Saeed KHARRATI, Shahram KARIMI

Utilizing RDPSO Algorithm for Economic-Environmental Load Dispatch Modeling Considering Distributed Energy Resources

There are many factors such as long construction time, high investment cost, and low competition between energy providers to justify penetrating the distributed energy resources (DERs) such as wind turbines (WTs) and demand response programs (DRPs) in power systems. The uncertainties about WTs’ power output have increased the complexity of the economic-environmental load dispatch (EELD) problem. Because it is very difficult to predict the output power of wind farms, additional costs are imposed to the EELD problem. The mean amount of wind energy density has been used to define the storage and additional costs in the developed model. In addition, the DRPs have been facing the problem in reduction of cost. Demand response programs have been considered in two approaches; in the first approach, a certain percentage of the buses’ load determines the maximum amount of participation of the DRPs and in the second one, a certain capacity of these programs determines the maximum amount of their participation. The efficiency of the developed model has been analyzed by simulation results on multi-area IEEE 118 bus test system. The operational constraints in the test system, including lines limit, supply–demand balance and the generation limit of generators, WTs, and DRPs have been considered in the EELD problem. Multi-objective Random Drift Particle Swarm Optimization (MORDPSO) has been used in this study to analyze the model. The effects of DERs have been analyzed on power loss, voltage profile, and static voltage stability of the test system.

PDF

___

1. P. Wang, Y. Xiao and Y. Ding, “Nodal market power assessment in electricity markets,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1373–1379, 2004.
2. A. Nourai, V. I. Kogan and C. M. Schafer, "Load leveling reduces T&D line losses," IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2168–2173, 2008.
3. R. Shaw, M. Attree, T. Jackson and M. Kay, "The value of reducing distribution losses bu domestic load shifting: A network perspective," Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 3159–3167, 2009.
4. X. Qi, Z. Ji, H. Wu, J. Zhang and L. Wang, "Short-term reliability assessment of generating systems considering demand response reliability," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 74371–74384, 2020.
5. M. Vahedipour-Dahraie, H. Rashidizadeh-Kermani, A. AnvariMoghaddam and J. M. Guerrero, "Stochastic risk-constrained scheduling of renewable-powered autonomous microgrids with demand response actions: Reliability and economic implications," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 1882–1895, 2020.
6. G. Artac, D. Flynn, B. Kladnik, M. Pantos, A. F. Gubina and R. Golob, "A new method for determination the demand response offer function," Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 100, pp. 55–64, 2013.
7. E. Shayesteh, A. Yousefi and M. P. Moghaddam, "A probabilistic risk based approach for spinning reserve provision using day ahead demand response program," Energy, vol. 35, pp. 1655–1663, 2010.
8. N. I. Nwulu and X. Xia, “Multi-objective dynamic economic emission dispatch of electric power generation integrated with game theory based demand response programs,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 89, pp. 963–974, 2015.
9. M. Alipour, K. Zare and B. M. Ivatloo, “Short-term scheduling of combined heat and power generation units in the presence of demand response programs,” Energy, vol. 71, pp. 289–301, 2014.
10. H. C. Gils, “Assessment of the theoretical demand response potential in Europe,” Energy, vol. 67, pp. 1–18, 2014.
11. D. K. Critz, S. Busche and S. Connors, “Power systems balancing with high penetration renewables: The potential of demand response in Hawaii,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 76, pp. 609–619, 2013.
12. S. Agrawal, et. al., “Modeling and power quality analysis of wind energy generation arrangement with SMR MPPT,” International Conference of Signal Processing and Integrated Networks, 2020.
13. Y. Zhou, Q. Zhai, M. Zhou and X. Li, “Generation scheduling of self-generation power plant in enterprise microgrid with wind power and gateway power bound limits,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 758–770, 2020.
14. N. Nouha and T. Souhir, “Optimal control of wind energy generation system,” Eng. Technol. International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, 2020.
15. S. M. Mousavi and T. Barforoushi, “Strategic wind power investment in competitive electricity markets considering the possibility of participation in intraday market,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 2676–2686, 2020.
16. S. Sayah and K. Zehar, “Economic load dispatch with security constraints of the Algerian power system using successive linear programming method,” Leonardo J. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 73–86, 2006.
17. Y. Z. Cheng, W. P. Xiao, W. J. Lee and M. Yang, “A new approach for missions and security constrained economic dispatch,” Proc. NAPS IEEE Conference Publication, pp. 1–5, 2009.
18. M. A. Abido, “Environmental/economic Power Dispatch Using Multi objective Evolutionary Algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1529–1537, 2003.
19. J. Nanda, D. P. Khotari and K. S. Lingamurthy, “Economic-emission load dispatch through goal programming techniques,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 1988.
20. C. S. Chang, A. C. Liew, J. X. Xu, X. W. Wang and B. Fan, “Dynamic security-constrained multi-objective generation dispatch of longitudinally interconnected power systems using bicriterion global optimization,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1009–1016, 1996.
21. Y. H. Song, G. S. Wang, P. Y. Wang and A. T. Johns, “Environmental/ economic dispatch using fuzzy logic controlled genetic algorithms,” IEEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 377–382, 1997.
22. T. Yalcinoz and H. Altun, “Environmentally constrained economic dispatch via a genetic algorithm with arithmetic crossover,” IEEE Afr. Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 928–938, 2002.
23. T. Thakur, K. Sem, S. Saini and S. Sharma, “Particle swarm optimization solution to NO2 and SO2 emissions for environmentally constrained economic dispatch problem.” IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America, pp. 1–5, 2006.
24. J. Cai, X. Ma, Q. Li, L. Li and H. Peng, “A multi-objective chaotic ant swarm optimization for environmental/economic dispatch, ” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 337–344, 2010.
25. P. K. Hota, A. K. Barisal and R. Chakrabart, “Economic emission load dispatch through fuzzy based bacterial foraging algorithm,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 794–803, 2010.
26. A. Bhattacharya and P. K. Chattopadhyay, “Solving economic emission load dispatch problems using hybrid differential evolution,” Soft Comput., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2526–2537, 2011.
27. K. W. Doty and P. L. McEntire, “An analysis of electric power brokerage systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., vol. PAS–101, no. 2, pp. 389–396, 1982.
28. T. Yalcinoz and M. J. Short, “Neural networks approach for solving economic dispatch problem with transmission capacity constraints,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 307–313, 1998.
29. P. S. Manoharan, P. S. Kannan, S. Baskar and M. W. Iruthayarajan, “Evolutionary algorithm solution and KKT based optimality verification to multi-area economic dispatch,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 31, no. 7–8, pp. 365–373, 2009.
30. H. Sharifzadeh, N. Amjady and H. Zareipour, “Multi-period stochastic security-constrained OPF considering the uncertainty sources of wind power, load demand and equipment unavailability,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 146, pp. 33–42, 2017.
31. A. H. Shahirinia, E. S. Soofi and D. C. Yu, “Probability distributions of outputs of stochastic economic dispatch,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 81, pp. 308–316, 2016.
32. M. Basu, “Quasi-oppositional group search optimization for multiarea dynamic economic dispatch,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 78, pp. 356–367, 2016.
33. J. Sun, V. Palade, X. Wu, W. Fang and Zh. Wang, “Solving the power economic dispatch problem with generator constraints by random drift particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 222–232, 2014.
34. J. Kennedy and Y. Shi, “Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization,” Proceedings of Te 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 84–88, 2000.
35. F. Habibi, F. Khosravi, S. Kharrati and Sh. Karimi, “Simultaneous multi-area economic-environmental load dispatch modeling in presence of wind turbines by MOPSO,” J. Electr. Eng. Technol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1059–1072, 2020.
36. R. Benabid, M. Boudour and M. A. Abido, “Optimal location and setting of SVC and TCSC devices using non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimization,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 1668–1677, 2009.