Environment by Genotype Interaction and Stability of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions in Trakia Region
Environment by Genotype Interaction and Stability of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions in Trakia Region
The study was conducted in the Trakya region, Turkey at five environments during the 2015-2016 growing cycles. Grain yield were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), the additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype and genotype-by-environment (GGE) biplot analyses. ANOVA and AMMI analysis showed highly significant (p < 0.01) differences among environments (E). Environment was responsible for the greatest part of the variation, followed by genotype and its interaction effects. Average yield across five environments varied from the highest 6673 kg ha-1 to the lowest 5008 kg ha-1. Across five environment Genotypes G7 and G12 had highest grain yield. Burgaz was found near the ideal test environment of the average environment coordination. Therefore, this location should be used as the most suitable to select widely adapted genotypes. For grain yield, cultivars Gelibolu, and G17, G8, and G12 lines were well adaptable to all environmental conditions. The graphical result showed that the first principal component PC1 explained 44.71% of the interaction sum of the square while the second principal component, PC2 explained 22.57% of some of the square interaction. The result of PCA revealed that the 2 principal components contributed 67.27% of the total variability. In the study, genotypes G12 and G17 selected in 2016 and then were released in 2019 named Anafarta and Abide, respectively.
___
- Ajay BC, Aravind J, Bera SK, Singh AL, Narendra K,
Gangadhar K and Kona P, (2020). Evaluation
of GEI and yield stability analysis in peanut
under phosphorus stress condition using stability
parameter of AMMI model. Agric Res 9: 477-486
- Alwala S, Kwolek T, McPherson M, Pellow J and
Meyer D, (2010). A comprehensive comparison
between Eberhart and Russell joint regression
and GGE biplot analyses to identify stable and
high yielding maize hybrids. Field Crops Res.
119:225-230. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.010
- Cooper M and Byth DE, (1996). Understanding plant
adaptation to achieve systematic applied crop
improvement - a fundamental challenge. Plant
adaptation and crop improvement. Edited by M.
Cooper and G. L. Hammer. Wallingford, United
Kingdom: CAB International. 5-23
- Dehghani H, Ebadi A and Yousefi A, (2006). Biplot
analysis of genotype by environment interaction
for barley yield in Iran. Agron. J. 98:388-393.
doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0310
Eberhart SA and Russell WA, (1966). Stability
parameters for comparing varieties. Crop.
Sci.6:36-40
- Eberhart SA and Russell WA, (1969). Yield stability for
a 10-line diallel of single-cross and double-cross
maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 9, 357-361
- Finlay KW and Wilkinson GN, (1963). The analysis of
adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust.
J. Agric. Res., 14:742-754
- Gauch HG, (1992). Statistical analysis of regional
yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs.
Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA, (1984). Statistical
Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed.
John Willey and Sons, Inc. New York. 641.
- Letta T, (2009). Genotype environment interactions and
correlation among stability parameters yield in
durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf) genotypes
grown in south east Ethiopia. African Crop
Science Proceedings, 8:693-698
- Maredia MK and Byerlee D, (eds.) (1999). The
global wheat improvement system: Prospect
for enhancing efficiency in the presence of
spillovers. CIMMYT Research Report No. 5.
Mexico D.F:CIMMY
- Moldovan V, Moldovan M and Kadar R, (2000).
Phenotypic stability for yield in chickpea.
Pakistan of Science Research, 30:455-465
- Naik A, Wani SH, Rafiqee S, Sofi M, Sofi NR, Shikari
AB, Hussain A, Mohiddin F, Jehangir IA, Khan
GH, Sofi MA, Sheikh FA, Bhat MA, Khan MN,
Dar ZA and Rahimi M, (2022). Deciphering
genotype × environment interaction by AMMI
and GGE biplot analysis among elite wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes of himalayan
region. Ekin J. 8(1):41-52
- Öztürk İ, (2021). Genotypes × environment interaction
and stability of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum
L.) cultivar under rainfed conditions. International
Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural
Research 2021, 5(3):257-268. doi:10.29329/
ijiaar.2021.378.1
- Öztürk İ and Korkut ZK, (2018). Evaluation of drought
tolerance indices and relationship with yield in
bread wheat genotypes under different drought
stress conditions. Journal of International
Scientific Publications. Agriculture & Food.
6:359-367
- Öztürk İ and Korkut KZ, (2020). Genotype x
environment interaction analysis of Triticum
aestivum L. for yield components. Agricultural
Science and Technology, 12(1):6-12, (online).
http://www.agriscitech.eu (Accessed 10
December 2021)
- Petersen RG, (1994). Agricultural field experiments:
Design and analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York.
NY
- Peterson CJ, Graybosch RA, Shelton DR and Baenziger
PS, (1998). Baking quality of hard red winter
wheat: Response of cultivars to environments in
the Great Plains. Euphytica 100 (1-3):157-162
- Pfeiffer WH and Braun HJ, (1989). Yield stability in
bread wheat. In J. Anderson and PB Hazel eds.
Variability in Grain Yields. Washington DC:
John Hopkins Univ. and the Int. Food Policy
Res. Inst.
8(2):118-127, 2022
- Sharma RC, Morgounov AI, Braun HJ, Akin B,
Keser M, Bedoshvili D, Bagcı A, Martius C
and van Ginkel M, (2010). Identifying high
yielding stable winter wheat genotypes for
irrigated environments in Central and West Asia.
Euphytica 171:53-64
- Solomon T, Shewaye Y, Zegeye H, Asnake D, Tadesse
Z and Girma B, (2018). Performance evaluation
of advanced bread wheat genotypes for yield
stability using the AMMI stability model. J. Agri.
Res. 2018, 3(4): 000168. P:1-7.
- Tai GCC, (1971). Genotypic stability analysis and its
application to potato regional trials. Crop Sci.
11:184-190
- Tsenov N, Atanasova D and Gubatov T, (2016).
Influence of environments on the amount and
stability of grain yield in the modern winter
wheat cultivars II. evaluation of each variety.
Ekin J. 2(1):57-73
- Tsenov N, Gubatov T and Yanchev I, (2020).
Correlations between grain yield and related traits
in winter wheat under multi-environmental Traits.
Agricultural Science and Technology, 12(4):295-
300, doi:10.15547/ast.2020.04.047
- Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q and Szlavnics Z, (2000).
Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment
investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop
Sci. 40:597-605
- Yan W and Kang MS, (2002). GGE biplot analysis:
A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and
agronomists. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press.
- Yan W and Rajcan IR, (2002). Biplot analysis of test
sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario.
Canadian Journal of Plant Science 42:11-20
- Yan W and Tinker NA, (2005). An integrated biplot
analysis system for displaying, interpreting and
exploring genotype × environment interaction.
Crop Science 45(3):1004−1016
- Yan W and Tinker NA, (2006). Biplot analysis of
multi-environment trial data: Principles and
applications. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86:623−645
- Yan W, (2002). Singular value partitioning in biplot
analysis of multi-environment trial data. Agron.
J. 94:990−996
- Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S and Cornelius
PL, (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of
genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47:
643-653