TURKISH PREP CLASS STUDENTS’ VIEWS ON AUTONOMOUS LEARNING AFTER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH
This paper is focused on two issues, learner autonomy and blended learning, in language
education by presenting an empirical study. The study aims to investigate university-
level students’ beliefs about their autonomous learning just after the implementation of
a blended learning approach. In order to set up this approach, the study integrated the
practice of both activities from a course management system and online journal writings
into an English writing course for academic purposes in a Turkish state university. Data
collection took place in December 2019. Among course takers, 21 voluntarily filled out
a survey asking about their views on their learning, particularly autonomous language
learning. Afterwards, five of them agreed to attend a semi-structured interviewing
process. Data from both research instruments indicated that Turkish prep class students
had positive feelings about autonomous language learning. The findings also showed
that the combination of classroom learning with online learning facilitated their learning
of the current course and their adaptable skills for future learning environments.
Accordingly, the study makes some recommendations for course designers, policymakers
and researchers to consider designing a blended learning environment consistent with the
classroom curriculum and learning outcomes.
___
- Adjagbodjou, P. (2015). Aligning sales promotion strategies with buying attitudes in a
recession. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. USA: Walden University.
- Alonazi, S. M. (2017). The role of teachers in promoting learner autonomy in secondary
schools in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 183-202.
- Arfae, A. M. (2017). Language learner autonomy in Ontario's ESL context. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation. Canada: The University of Western Ontario.
- Aspers, P. and Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative
Sociology, 42(2), 139-160.
- Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing students’ language skills through blended
learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 223-232.
- Barillaro, F. (2011). Teacher perspectives of learner autonomy in language learning.
Unpublished master’s thesis. UK: Sheffield Hallam University.
- Begum, J. (2019). Learner autonomy in EFL/ESL classrooms in Bangladesh: Teachers'
perceptions and practices. International Journal of Language Education, 3(1),
12-21.
- Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. London:
Routledge.
- Benson, P. and Chik,A. (2010). New literacies and autonomy in foreign language learning.
In M. J. Luzon, M. N. Ruiz-Madrid and M. L. Villanueva (Eds.), Digital Genres,
New Literacies and Autonomy in Language Learning (63–80). Newcastle:
Cambridge Scholars.
- Benson, P. and Cooker, L. (2013). The social and the individual in Applied Linguistics
research. In P. Benson and L. Cooker (Eds.), The Applied Linguistic Individual:
Sociocultural Approaches to Identity, Agency and Autonomy (1-16). Sheffield,
UK: Equinox.
- Bodsworth, H. and Goodyear, V. A. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to using digital
technologies in the Cooperative Learning model in physical education. Physical
Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(6), 563-579.
- Bree, R. T. and Gallagher, G. (2016). Using Microsoft Excel to code and thematically
analyse qualitative data: A simple, cost-effective approach. All Ireland Journal
of Higher Education, 8(2), 2811-2824.
- Chik, A. (2014). Digital gaming and language learning: Autonomy and
community. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 85-100.
- Council of Europe (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages:
Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method
Approaches, 4th edition. London: SAGE Publications.
- Dam, L. (2003). Developing learner autonomy: The teacher’s responsibility. Learner
autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and
assessment, 126-150.
- De Metz, N. and Bezuidenhout, A. (2018). An importance–competence analysis of the
roles and competencies of e-tutors at an open distance learning institution.
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5). 27-43.
- Dooly, M. (2017). Telecollaboration. In C.A. Chapelle and S. Sauro (Eds.), The Handbook
of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (169-183). London,
UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative,
and mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Everhard, C. J. and Murphy, L. (2015). Assessment and autonomy in language
learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Fabela-Cárdenas, M. A. (2012). The impact of teacher training for autonomous learning.
Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(3), 215-236.
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Autonomous language learning. Language Learning &
Technology, 15(3), 4-11.
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Riding the digital wilds: Learner autonomy and informal
language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 8–25.
- Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In C. R. Graham and C. J. Bonk
(Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs
(3-21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
- Gunes, S. (2019). What are the perceptions of the students about asynchronous distance
learning and blended learning? World Journal on Educational Technology:
Current Issues. 11(4), 230–237.
- Ha, T. T. N. (2019). English language learner autonomy in the Vietnamese higher
education context: Enabling factors and barriers arising from assessment
practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Philippines: The University of
Adelaide.
- Hafner, C. A. and Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for
science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning
environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68-86.
- Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon
Press.
- Inal, M. and Korkmaz, Ö. (2019). The effect of web based blended learning on students’
academic achievement and attitudes towards English course. Education and
Information Technologies, 24(4), 2603-2619.
- Isti'anah, A. (2017). The effect of blended learning to the students’ achievement in
grammar class. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 4(1), 16-30.
- Istifci,I.(2017).Perceptions ofTurkishEFLstudents on online language learning platforms
and blended language learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 113-
121.
- Jiang, X. (2008). Constructing concepts of learner autonomy in language education in the
Chinese context: A narrative-based inquiry into university students' conceptions
of successful English language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. UK:
University of Warwick.
- Joshi, K. R. (2011). Learner perceptions and teacher beliefs about learner autonomy in
language learning. Journal of NELTA, 16(1-2), 12-29.
- Kostina, M. (2011). Exploration of student perceptions of autonomy, student-instructor
dialogue and satisfaction in a web-based distance learning classroom.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation. USA: The University of Iowa.
- Lai, C. (2017). Autonomous language learning with technology: Beyond the classroom.
London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Larsen, L. J. (2012). Teacher and student perspectives on a blended learning intensive
English program writing course. Graduate thesis and dissertation. USA: Iowa
State University.
- Leidner, D. E. and Kayworth, T. (2006). A review of culture in information systems
research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS
quarterly, 357-399.
- Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on
teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181.
- Little, D. (2000). Learner autonomy and human interdependence: Some theoretical and
practical consequences of a social interactive view of cognition, learning, and
language. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy,
teacher autonomy: Future directions (15-23). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
- Ma, Z. and Ma, R. (2012). Motivating Chinese students by fostering learner autonomy in
language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 838-842.
- Meri-Yilan, S. (2020). Humanization of English language teaching through computer-
assisted language learning in Turkish tertiary level English preparatory classes.
- In E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger and M. S. Makhanya (Eds.), International
Perspectives on the Role of Technology in Humanizing Higher Education
(Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 33) (131–148).
Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
- Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. and Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A
methods sourcebook, 3rd edition. London: Sage.
- Motschnig-Pitrik, R. and Holzinger, A. (2002). Student-centered teaching meets
new media: Concept and case study. Journal of Educational Technology &
Society, 5(4), 160-172.
- Murray, G. (2017). Autonomy in the time of complexity: Lessons from beyond the
classroom. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 8(2), 116-134.
- Myartawan, I. P. N. W., Latief, M. A. and Suharmanto, S. (2013). The correlation
between learner autonomy and English proficiency of Indonesian EFL college
learners. Teflin Journal, 24(1), 63-81.
- Nelson-Gray, R. O., Haas, J. R., Romano, B., Herbert, J. D. and Herbert, D. L. (1989).
Effects of Open-Ended versus Close-Ended Questions on Interviewees’Problem-
Related Statements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69(3-1), 903-911.
- Orakci, S. and Gelisli, Y., 2017. Learner autonomy scale: A scale development
study. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), pp. 25-35.
- Raja, R. and Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in
education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 33-35.
- Reinders, H. and White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have
we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–
154.
- Rungwaraphong, P. (2012). The promotion of learner autonomy in Thailand tertiary
education: Lecturers’ perspectives and practices. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation. New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.
- Sadaghian, S., Marandi, S. S. and Iravani, H. (2020). Autonomous language learning in a
work-cycle: Learners’ perceptions, beliefs and behaviors. Studies in Self-Access
Learning Journal, 11(2), 67–85
- Schwienhorst, K. (2007). Learner autonomy and CALL environments. New York:
Routledge.
- Shen, J. (2011). Autonomy in EFL education. Canadian Social Science, 7(5), 27-32.
- Smith, M., Bell, K., Bennett, D. and McAlpine, A. (2018). Employability in a global
context: Evolving policy and practice in employability, work integrated learning,
and career development learning. Wollongong, Australia: Graduate Careers
Australia.
- Smith, R., Kuchah, K. and Lamb, M. (2018). Learner autonomy in developing countries.
In A. Chik, N. Aoki and R. Smith (Eds.), Autonomy in Language Learning and
Teaching (7-27). London: Palgrave Pivot.
- Snodin, N. S. (2013). The effects of blended learning with a CMS on the development of
autonomous learning: A case study of different degrees of autonomy achieved by
individual learners. Computers & Education, 61, 209-216.
- Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
- Soliman, N. A. (2014). Using e-learning to develop EFL students’ language skills and
activate their independent learning. Creative Education, 5, 752-757.
- Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary
enhancement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641-647.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural
perspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
- Wagman, P. and Hakansson,C.(2014).Introducing the occupational balance questionnaire
(OBQ). Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21(3), 227-231.
- Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Wright, B. M. (2017). Blended learning: Student perception of face-to-face and online
EFL lessons. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 64-71.
- Yasmin, M. and Sohail, A. (2018). A creative alliance between learner autonomy and
English language learning: Pakistani university teachers’ beliefs. Creativity
Studies, 11(1), 1-9.