EKONOMİ EĞİTİMİNİN SOSYAL VE POLİTİK DEĞERLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Çok sayıda çalışma, iktisat ve işletme eğitiminin diğer disiplinlere göre insanları daha bencil yaptığını bulmuşlardır. Özellikle küresel finansal kriz, iktisat ve işletme eğitiminin sosyal ve politik değerler üzerinde olumsuz etkilerinin olduğu hakkında ciddi endişelere yol açmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, iktisat ve işletme eğitiminin sosyal ve politik değer, inanç ve tutumlar üzerinde bir etkisinin olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu çalışmada, iktisat ve işletme çalışmanın etkilerini analiz etmek için bir anket çalışması tasarlandı. Anket, Kütahya’daki Dumlupınar üniversitesindeki beş farklı bölümünde öğrenim gören 435 öğrenciye uygulanan bazı sorular içermektedir: iktisat, işletme, uygulamalı bilimler, sosyıoloji ve ilahiyat. Çalışma, sonuç olarak, ekonomi bölümleri ile diğerleri arasında bazı anlamlı farklılıklara ulaşmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

İktisat Eğitimi, Sosyal ve Politik Değerler, Anket Çalışması

THE EFFECTS OF EDUCATION OF ECONOMICS ON SOCIAL AND POLITICAL VALUES

Many studies have found that education of economics and management makes people more selfish than other disciplines. Especially, the global financial crisis has raised serious concerns about that economics and mangement studying has negative effects on social and political values. The aim of paper is to examine whether or not education of economics and management has an effect on social and political values, believes and attitudes. In the paper, it was designed a survey to analyse social and political effects of economics and management studying. The survey includes some questions with 435 students from five different departments at Dumlupınar University in Kutahya: Economics, business administratinon, applied sciences, sociology and theology. As a result, the paper has reached some significant differences between economy deparments and others.

Keywords:

Education of Economics, Social and Political Values, A Survey,

PDF

___

Bauman, Y. ve Rose, E. (2011). “Selection or indoctrination: Why do economics students donate less than the rest?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 79, 318-327.
Benz, M. ve Meier, S. (2008). “Do people behave in experiments as in the ﬁeld? Evidence from donations. Experimental Economics” Working Paper 11, 268-281.
Carter, J. ve Irons, M. (1991). “Are economists different, and if so, why?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 171-177.
Cipriani G.P., Lubian D., ve Zago, A. (2009). “Natural born economists?”, Journal of Economic Psychology 30, 455-468.
Cox, S. R., (1998). “Are business and economics students taught to be noncooperative?”, Journal of Education for Business, 74, 69-74.
Faravelli, M. (2007), “How context matters: A survey based experiment on distributive justice”, Journal of Public Economics 91, 1399-1422.
Frank, B. ve Schulze, G. G. (2000). “Does Economics make citizens corrupt?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 43, 101-13.
Frank, R., Gilovich, T. ve Regan, D. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, 159-71.
Frank, R., Gilovich, T., ve Regan, D. (1996). “Do economists make bad citizens?”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, 187-92.
Frey, B.S. ve Meier, S. (2004), “Pro-social behavior in a natural setting.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54, 65-88.
Frey, B.S., ve Pommerehne, W.W., (1993). “On the fairness of pricing –an empirical survey among the general population”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 20, 295-307.
Haucap, J., ve Just, T. (2003). “Not guilty? Another look at the nature and nurture of economics students”. University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg Department of Economics (Discussion Paper No. 8).
Hole, A.D., (2013). “How do economists differ from others in distributive situations?” Nordic Journal of Political Economy 38(4).
Yoshio, I., ve Oda, S.（2011） "Does cconomics education make bad citizens? The effect of economics education in Japan", Journal of Education for Business, Vol.86, 234-239.
Jones, T. M., Thomas, T.. Agle, B., ve Ehreth. J. (1990). “Graduate business education and the moral development of MBA students: Theory and preliminary results”. Paper presented at the annual meeting to the International Association for Business and Society. San Diego, CA.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. ve Thaler, R. (1986). “Fairness and the assumptions of economics”, Journal of Business 59, 286-300.”
Kirchgassner, G., (2014). “On self-interest and greed”, Journal of Business Economics 84, 1191-1209.
Laband, D.N. ve Beil, R. O. (1999). “Are economists more selﬁsh than other social scientists?”, Public Choice, Vol. 100, 85-101.
Lopes, J.C., Graça, J. C., ve Correia, R. G. (2015). “Effects of economic education on social and political values, beliefs and attitudes: Results from a survey in Portugal”, Procedia Economics and Finance 30, 468-475.
Marwell, G. ve Ames, R. (1981). “Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods”, Journal of Public Economics, 15, 295-310.
Reinhard S. ve Ockenfels, A. (1998). “An experimental solidarity game”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol.34, 517-539.
Rubinstein, A. (2006). “A sceptic’s comment on the study of economics”, The Economic Journal, 116, 1-9.
Sam, A., Bosshardt, W. ve Watts, M. (2010), Is economics coursework, or majorıng in economics, associated with different civic behaviors?, Journal of Economic Education, Staff Report 450.
Sequino S., Stevens, T., ve Lutz, M. A. (1996). “Gender and cooperative behavior: Economic man rides alone”, Feminist Economics, 2, 1-21.
Stanley, T.D., ve Tran, U. (1998), “Economics students need not be greedy: fairness and the ultimatum game”, Journal of Socio-Economics, Volume 27, No. 6, 657-664.
Wang, L., Malhotra, D., ve Murnighan, J. K. (2011). “Economics education and greed”, Academy of Management Learning and Education 10, 643-660.
Yezer, A. M., Goldfarb, R. S. ve Poppen, P. J. (1996). “Does studying economics discourage cooperation? Watch what we do, not what we say or how we play”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, 177-186.