Nilüfer ATMAN USLU, Filiz MUMCU, Evrim ÜSTÜNLÜOĞLU

YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE DERS YAKALAMA SİSTEMİNİN (DYS) KULLANIMININÖĞRENCİ AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Son zamanlarda küresel ve ulusal ölçekte hissedilen ihtiyaçlar ve zorunluluklar nedeniyle teknolojiye dayalı öğretim yaklaşımlarının kullanılmasına ilişkin beklentiler artmış; üniversiteler bu beklentileri karşılamak için farklı uygulama arayışı içine girmişlerdir. Ders Yakalama Sistemi (DYS) bu uygulamalardan birisidir ve amacı, öğretim elemanının, çevrimiçi olarak ya da ders kayıtlarında gerekli gördüğü değişiklikleri yaptıktan sonra dersini, öğrenci erişimine açarak öğrencinin kendi ihtiyacı doğrultusunda bilgiye ulaşmasını ve tekrar etmesini sağlamaktır. Bu çalışmada, bir yükseköğretim kurumundaki öğrencilerin DYS’yi kullanım amaçları, DYS’ye ilişkin yarar algıları ve DYS kullanımı ile ilgili algıladıkları kısıtlılıklara ilişkin görüşlerinin betimlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, öğrencilerin DYS sistemini işlevsel ve yararlı bulduklarını, en çok sınavdan önce konuları gözden geçirmek, derste kaçırdığı ya da derse gelemediği durumlarda öğrenme eksikliklerini kapatmak için kullandıklarını ancak sisteme ulaşımda yaşadıkları en önemli kısıtlılığın teknik aksaklıklar olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu çalışma, teknolojiye dayalı öğretim yaklaşımlarının daha fazla önem kazandığı ve kullanıldığı günümüzde söz konusu yaklaşımların pedagojik değerini ön plana çıkaran araştırmaların yürütülmesini önermektedir.

INVESTIGATION OF LECTURE CAPTURE SYSTEM USE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TERMS OF STUDENTS

Due to changing needs at global and national level, there are currently greater than everexpectations from technology-enhanced teaching approaches. To meet these expectations,universities have been experimenting with different teaching approaches and applications.One of these approaches and applications is Lecture Capture (LC). LC is used to enablestudents to access their lectures both synchronously and asynchronously, and to use them ina way that best meets their needs. The aim of this study is to identify the current situation ata university in which the lecture capture approach is in use, by investigating students’perceptions on three areas of the LC system: its usefulness, its purpose, and itsconstraints/difficulties. Results indicated that students find LC approach functional and useful,especially for reviewing the content before exams, and making up for missed classes. Theresults also showed that the most commonly perceived constraint was technical problems inaccessing the videos. The study suggests that further research should focus on pedagogicalvalues of technology-enhanced teaching approaches.

PDF

___

Ashrafi, A., Zareravasan, A., Savoji, S. R., & Amani, M. (2020): Exploring factors influencing students’ continuance intention to use the learning management system (LMS): a multi-perspective framework, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.173402.
Al Nashash, H., ve Gunn, C. (2013). Lecture capture in engineering classes: Bridging gaps and enhancing learning. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 69-78.
Aldamen, H., Al-Esmail, R., ve Hollindale, J. (2015). Does lecture capturing impact student performance and attendance in an introductory accounting course?. Accounting Education, 24(4), 291-317.
Brooks, C., Erickson, G., Greer, J., ve Gutwin, C. (2014). Modelling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Computers & Education, 75, 282-292.
Danielson, J., Preast, V., Bender, H., ve Hassall, L. (2014). Is the effectiveness of lecture capture related to teaching approach or content type. Computers & Education, 72, 121-131.
Dommett, E. J., Gardner, B., ve van Tilburg, W. (2019). Staff and student views of lecture capture: A qualitative study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16:23.
Dommeyer, C. J. (2017). Lecture capturing: Its effects on students' absenteeism, performance, and impressions in a traditional marketing research course. Journal of Education for Business, 92(8), 388-395.
Dona, K. L., Gregory, J., ve Pechenkina, E. (2017). Lecture-recording technology in higher education: Exploring lecturer and student views across the disciplines. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 122-133.
Dinmore, S. (2019). Beyond lecture capture: Creating digital video content for online learning – a case study. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(1), 7, 1-10.
Edwards, M. R., ve Clinton, M. E. (2019). A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment. High Educ, 77, 403–421.
Elliott, C., ve Neal, D. (2016). Evaluating the use of lecture capture using a revealed preference approach. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 153-167.
Evans, G., ve Luke, K. (2020). Lecture capture and peer working: exploring study practices through staff–student partnerships. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 1-13.
Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., ve Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329- 348.
Germany, L. (2012). Beyond lecture capture: What teaching staff want from web-based lecture technologies. Australiasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1208- 1220.
Gregori, E. B., Zhang, J., Galván-Fernández, C., & Fernández-Navarro, F. D. A. (2018). Learner support in MOOCs: Identifying variables linked to completion. Computers & Education, 122, 153–168.
Hall, G., ve Ivaldi, A. (2017). A qualitative approach to understanding the role of lecture capture in student learning experiences. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 383-394.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
Joseph-Richard, P., Jessop, T., Okafor, G., Almpanis, T., ve Price, D. (2018). Big brother or harbinger of best practice: Can lecture capture actually improve teaching?. British Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 377-392.
Khee, C. M., Wei, G. W., ve Jamaluddin, S. A. (2014). Students’ perception towards lecture capture based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 461-469.
Luke, K. (2020). The pause/play button actor-network: lecture capture recordings and (re)configuring multi-spatial learning practices. Interactive Learning Environments, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1706052.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Rahman, A., Shah, M. A. R., ve Chowdhury, S. H. (2017). Lecture capture use in engineering education: Influence of students’ social and behavioral factors and teachers’ perceptions. Comput Appl Eng Educ., 26, 500–508.
Sanchez-Mena, A., Marti-Parreno, J., & Aldas-Manzano, J. (2017). The effect of age on teachers’ intention to use educational video games: A TAM approach. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(4), 355–365.
Secker, J., Bond, S.J. &, Grussendorf, S. (2010). Lecture capture: rich and strange, or a dark art?. Paper presented at the ALT-C 2010, September 6 – 9, Nottingham, UK.
Straub, E. T. (2010). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directIons for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79 (2), 625-649.
Surry, D., & Ely, D. P. (2002). Adoption, Diffusion, Implementation, and Institutionalization of Educational Technology. In Reinser & Dempsey (Eds.) Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Toppin, I. (2011). Video lecture capture (VLC) system: A comparison of student and faculty perceptions. Education and Information Technologies. 16, 383-393.
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., & Bakır, E. (2019). The effect of subjective norms on preservice and in-service teachers’ behavioural intentions to use technology: A multigroup multimodel study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2501-2519.
Williams, A. E., Aguilar-Roca, N. M., ve O’Dowd, D. K. (2015). Lecture capture podcasts: differential student use and performance in a large introductory course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 64, 1-12.
Witton, G. (2017). The value of capture: Taking an alternative approach to using lecture capture technologies for increased impact on student learning and engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 1010-1019.
Yalçın, M. E., & Kutlu, B. (2019). Examination of students’ acceptance of and intention to use learning management systems using extended TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2414-2432.
Yıldırım, A. Ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
Yu, P.-T., Wang, B. –Y., ve Su, M. –H. (2015). Lecture capture with real-time rearrangement of visual elements: impact on student performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 655-670.
Zhang, C., Chen, H., Phang, C. W., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Role of instructors’ forum interactions with students in promoting MOOC continuance. Journal of Global Information Management, 26(3), 105–120.