Yeliz SARIÖZ GÖKTEN

6619

Proleteryadan Prekaryaya: Yeni Bir Küresel Sınıf (!)

Petrol krizi, kapitalist sistemde Keynesyen refah devleti ve fordist üretim sisteminin sonunuhazırlarken neoliberal düzen ve post fordizm ile düzen yeniden biçimlenmiştir. Bu süreçtedevletin fonksiyonları daraltılmış, serbest piyasa ulaşabileceği en yüksek düzeyine erişmiştir.Post fordist üretim sistemi ile bilgi temelli ve teknolojiye dayalı üretim esas olurken emeksüreçlerinin evrimi ivme kazanmıştır. Bu yeni birikim rejiminde emek piyasası deregüle edilmiş,sendikaların ağırlığı zayıflatılmış, güvencesiz ve esnek bir istihdam sürecine geçilmiştir. Buyeni emek süreci proleter sınıfın yerini yeni küresel bir prekarya sınıfının alacağı şeklindeyorumlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada neoliberal düzende emek süreçleri ve prekaryanın rolü üzerinetartışmalar yapılacaktır.

From Proletariat to Precariat: A New Global Class (!)

While the oil crisis brought the end of the Keynesian welfare state and for distproduction system, the capitalist order was restructured by neoliberalism and post-fordism. In this process, the functions of the state have reduced and the sphere of free market has reached its highest level. Knowledge and technology-based production has become essential with the post-fordist production system, the evolution of labor processes gained momentum. In this new accumulation regime, the labor market was deregulated, the unions were weakened, a precarious and flexible employment system was adopted. This new labor process is interpreted as the proletarian class will be replaced by a new global class of precariat. In this study, discussions will be held on labor process and the role of the precariat in the neoliberal order.
PDF

___

  • Allen, K. (2009),. “Social Partnership and Union revitalizatiuon: The Irish Case”, In G. Gall (eds) The Future of Union Organisaing, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp: 43-53.
  • Arnold, D./J. Pickles (2011). “Global Work, Surplus Labor, And The Precarious Economies Of The Border”, Antipode,Vol. 43 No. 5 2011 ISSN 0066-4812, pp: 1598–1624.
  • Arnold, D./J. Bongiovi (2013). “Precarious, Informalizing And Flexible Work: Transforming Concepts And Understanding”, American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3): 289-308.
  • Breman, Jan (2013). “A Bogus Concept?”, New Left Review, No. 84, pp: 130-138.
  • Clarke, S. (1990). “The Crisis of Fordismand the Crisis of Capitalism”, Telos, New York, 83, Spring, pp: 71– 98.
  • Doogan, K. (2009). New Capitalism? The Transformation of Work, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Frase, P. (2013). “The Precariat: A Class Or A Condition?”, New Labor Forum, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 11-14.
  • Freeman, R. (2006). The Great Doubling: The Challenge of the New Global Labor Market https://eml.berkeley.edu/~webfac/eichengreen/e183_sp07/ great_doub.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30.08.2018).
  • Fudge, J./ R. Owens (2006). “Precarious Work, Women, And The New Economy: The Challenge To Legal Norms”, İçinde Precarius Work, Women And The New Economy, Edited by Judy Fudge and Rosemary Owens, Hart Press, Oxford, pp: 3-27.
  • Hardt, M. ve A. Negri (2009). Commonwealth, Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Harvey, D. (1992). The Condition of Postmodernity An Enquiry Into The Origins Of Cultural Change, Blackwell Press.
  • Jessop B. (1992). “Fordism And Post Fordism a Critical Reformulation”, İçinde Pathways To Industrialization And Regional Development, Edited by Allen J. Scott, Michael Storper, Routledge Press, pp: 42-62.
  • Kalleberg, A. (2009). “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations In Transition”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 74, No. 1 (Feb., 2009), pp. 1-22.
  • Marx, K. ve F. E. (2014). Komünist Manifesto, Çeviren Nail Satlıgan, 2. Baskı, Yordam Kitap, İstanbul.
  • Mitropouslos, A. (2005). “Precari-us?”, http://www.metamute.org/editorial/ articles/precari-us (Erişim Tarihi: 15.07.2018).
  • Moody, K. (2016). “Precariat, Gigariat, or 21st Century Proletariat? U.S. Labor What’s New, What’s Not.”, Against the Current , Vol. 31, Issue 182, p: 16-22.
  • Morton, A. D. (2003). “Social Forces in the Struggle over Hegemony: NeoGramscian Perspectives in International Political Economy”, Rethinking Marxism, Vol: 15, No: 2, pp: 153-179.
  • Munck, R. (2013). “The Precariat: A View From The South”, Third World Quarterly, 34:5, 747-762, DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2013.800751
  • Neilson, B./N. Rossiter (2008). “Precarity As A Political Concept, Or, Fordism As Exception”, Theory Culture Society, 25 (7-8), pp: 51-72.
  • Oğuz, Ş. (2011). “Tekel Direnişinin Işığında Güvencesiz Çalışma/Yaşama: Proleteryadan Prekarya’ya Mı?”, Mülkiye Dergisi, Cilt: XXXV, Sayı: 271, pp: 7-23.
  • Scully, B. (2016). “Precarity North And South: A Southern Critique Of Guy
  • Standing”, Global Labour Journal, 2016, 7(2), pp: 160-172.
  • Seymour, R. (2012). ‘We Are All Precarious—On The Concept Of The “Precariat” And Its Misuses’, http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/ site/article_comments /we_are_all_precarious_on_the_concept_of_the_ precariat_and_its_misuses (Erişim Tarihi: 30.08.2018).
  • Siegmann, K. ve K. Schiphorst (2016). “Understanding the globalizing precariat: From informal sector to precarious work”, Progress in Development Studies 16, 2 (2016) pp. 111–123.
  • Standing, G. (1997). “Globalization, Labour Flexibility and Insecurity: The Era of Market Regulation”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 3 No.1, pp:7-37.
  • Standing, G. (2012). “The Precariat: From Denizens To Citizens?”, Polity, Vol. 44, No. 4, Deepening Democracy (October 2012), pp. 588-608.
  • Standing, G. (2014a). “The Precariat”, Contexts, Vol. 13, No. 4 (Fall 2014), pp. 10-12.
  • Standing, G. (2014b). “Why The Precariat Is Not A “Bogus Concept”, https:// www.opendemocracy.net/print/79901#_ftn3 (Erişim Tarihi, 04.08.2018).
  • Standing, G. (2015). Prekarya Yeni Tehlikeli Sınıf, Çeviren Ergin Bulut, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Standing, G. (2018). “The Precariat: Today’s Transformative Class?”, https:// www.greattransition.org/publication/precariat-transformative-class (Erişim Tarihi: 22.12.2018).
  • Rodgers, G. (1989). Precarious Work In Western Europe: The State Of The Debate, Precarious Jobs In Labour Market Regulation: The Growth Of Typical Employment In Western Europe, Edited by Gerry and Janine Rodgers, International Institute for Labour Studies Free University of Brussels.
  • Vallas, P.S. (1999). “Rethinking Post-Fordism: The Meaning Of Workplace Flexibility”, Sociological Theory, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 68-101.
  • Vosko, L. F. (2010). Managing The Margins: Gender, Citizenship And The International Regulation Of Precarious Employment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. World Bank, https://data.worldbank.org/
  • Wright, E. (2016), “Is the Precariat a Class”, Global Labour Journal, 7(2), pp:123-135.
Eğitim Bilim Toplum-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-9202
  • Başlangıç: 2003
  • Yayıncı: EĞİTİM VE BİLİM EMEKÇİLERİ SENDİKASI
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Muğla’nın Kaliteli Bir Yaşam Ekseninde Gelişme Olanaklarının Kömürle Enerji Üretimi Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi

Semra PURKİS

Mekân, Yer ve Şehir: Türkiye’de Suriye Karşıtlığının Kentteki Görünümleri

Cenk SARAÇOĞLU, Danièle BELANGER

Proleteryadan Prekaryaya: Yeni Bir Küresel Sınıf (!)

Yeliz SARIÖZ GÖKTEN

Olimpiyat ve Dünya Kupası Organizasyonlarına Ekonomi-Politik Bakış

Yavuz YILDIRIM, Kerem GÖKTEN