Orta Yaş ve Üstü Bireylerde Üçüncü Molar Dişlerin Değerlendirilmesi

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 50 yaş ve üstü bireylerde panoramik radyograflarda üçüncü molar diş prevelansının belirlenmesi ve bu dişlerle ilişkili patolojilerin değerlendirilmesidir. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Bu çalışmada, 50 yaş ve üzeri 300 hastaya ait panoramik radyograflar değerlendirildi. Üçüncü molar diş prevelansı, gömüklük durumu ve pozisyonu, bu dişlerle ilgili durumlar ve patolojiler incelendi. BULGULAR: Çalışmada değerlendirilen 300 hastada toplam 272 adet üçüncü molar diş olup; bunların 115 tanesi üst çenede, 157 tanesi ise alt çenede izlenmiştir. Üçüncü molar dişlerin %13.2’si gömülü olarak belirlenmiştir. 272 adet dişin %3.3’ünün hiçbir patoloji izlenmeyen sağlıklı diş olduğu gözlendi. TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: İleri yaşlarda da ağızda üçüncü molar diş görülme olasılığının fazla olduğu; kist/ tümör gibi ciddi patolojiler nadir olarak görülse de, çürük ile ilgili durumlar ve periodontal patolojilere sık rastlandığı görülmüştür.İleri yaşlarda gömülü ÜMD’lere erkeklerde kadınlara göre daha fazla rastlandığı tespit edilmiştir. İleri yaşlarda gömülü üçüncü molar dişlerin en sık vertikal pozisyonda olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Evaluation of the Third Molars in Middle Aged and Older İndividuals

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of third molar teeth on panoramic radiographs in adults aged 50 and older individuals and to evaluate the pathologies associated with these teeth. METHODS: In this study, 300 panoramic radiographs of 50 years and older patients were evaluated. Third molar tooth prevalence, impacted teeth and position, conditions and pathologies related to these teeth were examined. RESULTS: There were 272 third molar teeth in 300 patients evaluated in the study; 115 of them were seen in the maxilla and 157 of them in the mandibula. 13.2% of 272 third molars were seen as impacted teeth. 3.3% of 272 teeth were observed to be healthy teeth without any pathology. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In middle aged and older individuals, the possibility of third molar tooth appearance is high in the mouth; severe pathologies such as cysts / tumors are seen rarely, but cariesrelated conditions and periodontal pathologies are common. It was found that the impacted third molar teeth in middle aged and older individuals were more common in males than females. The most common position of the impacted third molar teeth in middle-aged and older individuals was vertical.

___

  • Peterson LJ, Ellis E, Hupp JR, Tucker M. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 4th ed., Mosby: St Louis, 2003, 184–213.
  • Milles M, Desjardins PJ, Pawel HE. The facial plethysmograph: A new instrument to measure facial swelling volumetrically. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 43: 346-352.
  • Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen PE, Waite PD. Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2nd ed., London: BC Decker, Inc, 2004.
  • Chou YU, Ho PS, Ho KY, Wang WC, Hu KF. Association between the eruption of the third molar and caries and periodontitis distal to the second molars in elderly patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2017; 33: 246-251.
  • Sumer M, Yıldız L, Nal S, Sumer AP, Mısır F. Gömülü üçüncü molar dişlerin perikoronal dokularındaki patolojik değişiklikler. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006; 7: 195–198.
  • Song F, Glenny AM, Sheldon TA. Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: an assessment of published reviews. Br Dent J 1997; 182: 339-346.
  • Liedholm R, Knutson K, Rohlin M. Mandibular third molars: oral surgeons assessment of the indications for removal. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 37: 440-443.
  • Dunne CM, Goodall CA, Leithch JA, Russell DI. Removal of third molar in Scottish oral and maxillofacial units: a review of practice in. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 44: 313-316.
  • Lysell L, Rohlin M. A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 161–164.
  • Nordenren A, Hultin M, Kjellman O, Ramstrom G. Indications for surgical removal of the mandibular third molar. Study of 2630 cases. Swed Dent J 1987; 11: 23–29.
  • Eliason S, Heimdahl A. Pathologic changes related to long term impaction of third molars: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 18: 210–212.
  • Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig 2008; 12: 291-302.
  • Smith AC, Barry SE, Chiong AY et al. Inferior alveolar nerve damage following removal of mandibular third molar teeth. A prospective study using panoramic radiography. Aust Dent J 1997; 42: 149-152.
  • Bell GW. Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 42: 21-27.
  • Gomes AC, Vasconcelos BC, Silva ED, Caldas Ade F Jr, Pita Neto IC. Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66: 256-259.
  • Winter GB. Principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted third molar. St.Louis: American Medical Books, 1926.
  • Venta I, Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Meurman J, Ylipaavalniemi P. Clinical follow-up study of third molar eruption from ages 20 to 26 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72: 150– 153.
  • Ventä I, Kylätie E, Hiltunen K. Pathology related to third molars in the elderly persons. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 1785-1789.
  • Fisher EL, Moss KL, Offenbacher S, Beck JD, White RP Jr. Third molar caries experience in middle-aged and older Americans: a prevalence study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 634-640.
  • Moss KL. Third Molars and Periodontal Pathology in Middle Aged and Older Americans. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 2592–2598.
  • Moss KL, Beck JD, Mauriello SM, Offenbacher S, White RP. Third molar periodontal pathology and caries in senior adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 65: 103-108.
  • Hugoson A, Kugelberg CF. The prevalence of third molars in a Swedish population. An epidemiological study. Community Dent Health 1988; 5: 121-38.
  • Yamaoka M, Furusawa K, Tambo A, Imai S. Remaining mandibular third molars in an adult population. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 895–898.
  • Nunn ME, Fish MD, Garcia RI et al. Retained asymptomatic third molars and risk for second molar pathology. J Dent Res 2013; 92: 1095-1099.
  • Garaas R, Moss KL, Fisher EL et al. Prevalence of visible third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in middle-aged and older Americans. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 463- 470.
  • Etöz M, Şekerci AE, Şişman Y. Türk Toplumunda üçüncü molar dişlerin retrospektif radyografik analizi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2011; 21: 170-174.
  • Goyal S, Verma P, Raj SS. Radiographic evaluation of the status of third molars in Sriganganagar population – A digital panoramic study. Malays J Med Sci 2016; 23(6): 103–112.
  • Patil S. Prevalence and type of pathological conditions associated with unerupted and retained third molars in the Western Indian population. J Cranio Max Diseases 2013; 2: 10.
  • Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: Postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc 2007; 73: 325.
  • Quee TAC, Gosselin D, Millar EP, Stamm JW. Surgical removal of he fully impacted mandibular third molar. The influence of flap design and alveolar bone height on the periodontal status of the second molar. J Periodontol 1985; 56: 625-630.