Farklı Isıl İşlem Uygulanmış Nikel Titanyum Eğelerin Döngüsel Yorgunluk Dirençlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Amaç: Farklı ısıl işlem uygulamaları ile üretilmiş nikel titanyum eğelerinin döngüsel yorgunluk dirençlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntem: On ikişer adet Scope RS Gold (25.06), Scope RS Blue (25.06) ve Scope RS “controlled memory” (CM) (25.06) nikel titanyum eğeleri çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Eğeler 60° kanal kurvatür açısına ve 3 mm kurvatür yarı çapına sahip paslanmaz çelikten yapılmış yapay kanallar kullanılarak döngüsel yorgunluk testi uygulandı. Eğeler kırılıncaya kadar geçen süre kaydedildi ve eğelerin kırılıncaya kadar gerçekleştirdiği tur sayısı hesaplandı. Elde edilen veriler One-way ANOVA ve post-hoc Tukey testi ile istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Eğelerin kırılma dayanımının yüksekten düşüğe sıralaması Scope RS CM, Scope RS Gold ve Scope RS Blue olarak bulundu. Scope RS CM eğelerinin döngüsel yorgunluk direnci diğer gruplardan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulundu (p0,05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sınırları dâhilinde, Scope RS CM nikel titanyum eğesinin döngüsel yorgunluk direnci Scope RS Gold ve Scope RS Blue eğelerinden daha yüksek bulunmuştur.

The Comparative Evaluation of Cyclic Fatique Resistance of Different Heat-treated NiTi Instruments

Objective: To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of different heat-treated NiTi files. Methods: Scope RS Gold (25.06), Scope RS Blue (25.06) and Scope RS controlled memory (CM) (25.06) nickel titanium files were included in the present study (n=12). According to the manufacturer instruction files were rotated in an artificial stainless steel canal with 3 mm radius and 60° angle of curvature. The time to failure of files was recorded and the number of cycles to failure of the files were calculated. The data were analysed with One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests. Results: The mean number of cycles to failure of files highest to lowest was Scope RS CM, Scope RS Gold and Scope RS Blue, respectively. A statistically significant difference was noted between Scope CM and the other two groups (p0.05).Conclusion: Within the limitation of the present study the cyclic fatigue resistance of Scope RS CM nickel titanium files was greater than the Scope RS Blue and Scope RS Gold nickel titanium files.

___

  • 1. Bird DC, Chambers D, Peters OA. Usage parameters of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a survey of endodontists in the United States. J Endod 2009;35:1193-1197.
  • 2. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-165.
  • 3. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Am J Dent 2001;14:324-333.
  • 4. Young JM, Van Vliet KJ. Predicting in vivo failure of pseudoelastic NiTi devices under low cycle, high amplitude fatigue. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;72:17-26.
  • 5. Perez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC. Cyclic fatigue resistance of K3, K3XF,and twisted file nickel-titanium files under continuous rotation or reciprocating motion. J Endod 2013;39:1585– 1588.
  • 6. Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu G. Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J 2017;50:713–717.
  • 7. Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys - a review. Int Endod J 2018;51:1088-1103.
  • 8. Hieawy A, Haapasalo M, Zhou H, et al. Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bending and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal instruments. J Endod 2015;41:1134– 1138.
  • 9. Silva EJ, Muniz BL, Pires F, et al. Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems. Restor Dent Endod 2016;41:1–5.
  • 10. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2013; 39:163–172.
  • 11. Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod 2012;38:398–401.
  • 12. Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties. J Endod 2017; 42:1840–1843.
  • 13. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008; 34:1003–1005.
  • 14. https://scopeendo.com.tr/wpcontent/ uploads/2020/06/Kullanım-Kılavuzu- RS.pdf
  • 15. Cheung G, Zhang E, Zheng Y. A numerical method for predicting the bending fatigue life of NiTi and stainless steel root canal instruments. Int Endod J 2011; 44:357-361.
  • 16. Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and Genius files in a double (S-shaped) curved canal. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2017;11: 241–246.
  • 17. Serafin M, De Biasi M, Franco V, Angerame D. In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of two rotary single-file endodontic systems: OneCurve versus OneShape. Odontology 2019; 107:196-201.
  • 18. Pérez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC. Cyclic fatigue resistance of K3, K3XF, and twisted file nickel-titanium files under continuous rotation or reciprocating motion. J Endod 2013; 39: 1585‐ 1588.
  • 19. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Wang Z, Campbell L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. Phase transformation behavior and mechanical properties of thermomechanically treated K3XF nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013;39:919‐923.
  • 20. Shen Y, Riyahi AM, Campbell L, et al. Effect of a combination of torsional and cyclic fatigue preloading on the fracture behavior of K3 and K3XF instruments. J Endod. 2015;41:526‐530.
  • 21. Serefoglu B, Kaval ME, Micoogullari Kurt S, Çalişkan MK. Cyclic fatigue resistance of novel glide path instruments with different alloy properties and kinematics. J Endod 2018;44:1422- 1424.
  • 22. Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, Uslu G, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistances of Hyflex EDM, WaveOne gold, Reciproc blue and 2shape NiTi rotary files in different artificial canals. Odontology 2018;106:408-413.
  • 23. Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod 2006; 32:55-57.
  • 24. Yared, GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of Profile rotary instruments after simulated clinical use. Int Endod J 1999;32: 115–119.
  • 25. Larsen CM, Watanabe I, Glickman GN, He J. Cyclic fatique analysis of a new generation of nickeltitanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2009; 35:401- 403.
  • 26. Grande NM, Plotino G, Pecci R, Bedini R, Somma F. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel-titanium rotary systems. Int Endod J 2006;39:755–763.
  • 27. Ertuğrul İF, Orhan EO. Cyclic fatigue and energydispersive X-ray spectroscopy examination of the novel ROTATE instrument. Micros Res Tech 2019;82:2042-2048.
  • 28. Keleş A, Eymirli A, Uyanık O, Nagas E. Influence of static and dynamic cyclic fatigue tests on the lifespan of four reciprocating systems at different temperatures. Int Endod J 2019;52: 880–886.
  • 29. de Vasconcelos RA, Murphy S, Carvalho CA, Govindjee RG, Govindjee S, Peters OA. Evidence for Reduced Fatigue Resistance of Contemporary Rotary Instruments Exposed to Body Temperature. J Endod 2016;42:782‐787.
  • 30. Gündoğar M, Özyürek T. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue Nickel-titanium Instruments. J Endod 2017;43:1192‐1196.
  • 31. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, et al. Metallurgical characterization of controlled memory wire nickeltitanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2011;37:1566- 1571.
  • 32. Yılmaz, K, Uslu G, Gündogar M, Özyürek T, Grande NM, Plotino G. Cyclic fatigue resistances of several nickel–titanium glide path rotary and reciprocating instruments at body temperature. Int Endod J 2018; 51: 924–930
  • 33. Zhou H, Peng B, Zheng YF. An overview of the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Endod Topics 2013; 29: 42–54.
Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-7476
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1979
  • Yayıncı: Ege Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Dental Travma ile İlgili İnternet Aracılığıyla Ulaşılan Bilgilerin Niteliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Ezgi YILMAZ, Ece EDEN

Gebelik ve Tanısal Görüntüleme Yöntemleri

Ceyda GÜRHAN, Elif ŞENER

İmplant Üstü Protezlerde Kullanılan Ölçü Maddelerinin Fizikokimyasal Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Makbule HEVAL ŞAHİN, Rahime TÜZÜNSOY AKTAŞ, Niler ÖZDEMİR AKKUŞ

Comparison of Four Different Electronic Pain Rating Scales in Patients with Symptomatic Tooth

Tan Fırat EYÜBOĞLU

Alveol Kret Yüksekliği ve Maksiller Sinüs Mukozası: Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Değerlendirmesi

Oğuzhan DEMİREL, Aslıhan AKBULUT

Semptomatik Dişlere Sahip Olan Hastalarda Dört Farklı Elektronik Ağrı DeğelendirmeSkalasının Karşılaştırılması

Tan Fırat EYÜBOĞLU

Farklı Isıl İşlem Uygulanmış Nikel Titanyum Eğelerin Döngüsel Yorgunluk Dirençlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Gözde KANDEMİR DEMİRCİ, Seniha MİCOOĞULARI KURT, Burcu SEREFOĞLU, Mehmet Emin KAVAL, Mehmet Kemal ÇALIŞKAN

Dişeti Fenotipinin Önemi ve Belirleme Yöntemleri

Esra AŞIK, Elif ŞENER, Bedriye Güniz BAKSI ŞEN, Sema ÇINAR BECERİK

Okul öncesi çocuklarda erken çocukluk çağı çürüklerine etki eden faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel Çalışma

Gülçin BULUT, Ozgur Hakan BULUT

Ebeveynlerin Çocuk Diş Macunu Seçimini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi

Edibe EGİL, Canan DUMAN, Serhat KARACA, Sibel ACAR EZBERCİ, Dilek Özge YILMAZ, Derya TABAKÇILAR