Gökmen Akkaya, Çağatay Bilen, Osman Nuri Tuncer, Yüksel Atay, Mehmet Fatih Ayık

Ebstein anomalisinin cerrahi tedavisi: Tek merkez deneyimi

Amaç: Ebstein anomalisi triküspid kapak delaminasyonundaki yetersizlik sonucu oluşan nadir bir konjenital kalp hastalığıdır. Hastalığın tedavisinde farklı cerrahi yöntemler bugüne dek tanımlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada cerrahi deneyim ve kısa dönem cerrahi sonuçlarımızı belirtmekteyiz. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 2007-2017 yılları arasında merkezimizde Ebstein anomalisi tanısı ile opere edilen on hasta dahil edildi. İki hastaya bir buçuk ventrikül tamiri uygulanırken diğer sekiz hasta Danielson metodu ile opere edildi. Bu hasta grupları arasında kros klemp ve kardiyopulmoner by-pass zamanları ile yoğun bakım ve entübasyon süreleri ve kan ürünü replasman gereksinimleri karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Hastalarda mortalite gözlenmedi. Bir buçuk ventrikül tamiri uygulanan hastalarda Danielson uygulanan hasta grubuna göre hem kros klemp (p=0,044) hem de kardiyopulmoner by-pass süresi (p=0,044) daha az izlendi. Diğer yönden iki grup arasında yoğun bakım yatış süreleri (p=0,400) veya entübasyon süreleri (p=0,889) arasında anlamlı fark izlenmedi. Danielson ameliyatı uygulanan iki infant hasta hesaplamaya dahil edilmediği durumda yapılan karşılaştırmada, kan ürünü gereksinimi ve drenaj miktarlarında gruplar arasında belirgin fark izlenmedi. Sonuç: Danielson metodu, infant yaş grubunda Ebstein anomalisi tedavisinde diğer tanımlanmış tamir yöntemlerine benzer klinik sonuçlarla, güvenli ve etkin bir biçimde uygulanabilir. Yine de bir buçuk ventrikül tamir seçeneği geniş atriyalize ventrikülü olan hastalarda faydalı bir yöntemdir. Nihai karar hastanın karakteri ve cerrahi ekibin geçmiş tecrübeleri göz önüne alınarak kalp ekibi tarafından verilmelidir.

Surgical treatment of Ebstein anomaly: A unicenter experience

Aim: Ebstein anomaly is a rare congenital cardiac disorder that causing by failure of delamination of the tricuspidvalve. Various surgical methods have been developed so far as treatment options. Our initial experience and shortterm follow up reported herein.Materials and Methods: Ten patients underwent surgical treatment with a diagnosis of Ebstein anomaly in ourcenter between 2007 and 2017. Two patients underwent one and a half ventricle repair and Danielson methodapplied to eight patients. The X-clamping and cardiopulmonary by-pass (CPB) timing, duration in intensive care unit(ICU), extubation time and need for blood product were compared between Danielson and one and a half ventriclerepair applied patients.Results: There was no mortality among patients. In the one and a half repair applied group both X-clamping(p=0.044) and CPB time (p=0.044) was longer compared to Danielson group. On the other hand there is nosignificantly difference between groups in ICU duration (p=0.400) or extubation timing (p=0.889). Furthermore, needfor blood product and amount of drainage were not different between groups when two infant age cases wereexcepted while calculating.Conclusion: Danielson method is safe and effective in the repair of Ebstein anomaly and can be applied at infantage with similar clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, one and a half repair option is also beneficial in patients with a largesize atrialized right ventricular volume. The last decision should be confirmed by heart team considering patientcharacteristics and surgeons’ past experience.

PDF

___

1. Schiebler GL, Gravenstein JS, Van Mierop LH. Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve: Translation of original description with comments. Am J Cardiol 1968;22(6): 867-73.
2. Danielson GK. Ebstein’s anomaly: Editorial comments and personal observations. Ann Thorac Surg 1982;34(4),396-400.
3. Porter JC. Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve. In: Garson A, Bricker JT, eds. The science and practice of pediatric cardiology. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger Publ 1990:1134-44.
4. Carpentier A, Chauvaud S, Mace L, et al. A new reconstructive operation for Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96(1):92-101.
5. Dearani JA, Danielson GK. Congenital heart surgery nomenclature and database project: Ebstein's anomaly and tricuspid valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69(3):106-17.
6. Frescura C, Angelini A, Daliento L, et al. Morphological aspects of Ebstein's anomaly in adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48(04):203-8.
7. Malvindi PG, Viola N. Ebstein's anomaly: Diagnosis and surgical treatment. G Ital Cardiol 2015;16(3):175-85.
8. Brown ML, Dearani JA, Danielson GK, et al. The outcomes of operations for 539 patients with Ebstein anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135(5):1120-36.
9. Anderson HN, Dearani JA, Said SM, et al. Cone reconstruction in children with Ebstein anomaly: The Mayo Clinic experience. Congenit Heart Dis 2014;9(3):266-71.
10. Silva JP, Silva L da F, Moreira LF, et al. Cone reconstruction in Ebstein’s anomaly repair: Early and long-term results. Arq Bras Cardiol 2011;97(3):199-208.
11. Boston US, Goldberg SP, Ward KE, et al. Complete repair of Ebstein anomaly in neonates and young infants: A 16-year followup. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141(5):1163-9.
12. Allen MR, Hayes DL, Warnes CA, et al. Permanent pacing in Ebstein's anomaly. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20(5):1243-6.
13. Brown ML, Dearani JA, Danielson G, et al. Effect of operation for Ebstein anomaly on left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 2008;102(12):1724-7.
14. Takagaki M, Ishino K, Kawada M, et al. Total right ventricular exclusion improves left ventricular function in patients with endstage congestive right ventricular failure. Circulation 2003;108(10):226-9.
15. Saxena A, Lee AHS, Fong LV. Functional and histological abnormalities of the left ventricle in Ebstein’s anomaly of the tricuspid valve. Indian Heart J 1993;45(2):135-6.
16. Quinonez LG, Dearani JA, Puga FJ, et al. Results of the 1.5-ventricle repair for Ebstein anomaly and the failing right ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133(5):1303-10