AVRUPA'DA GÖÇ POLİTİKALARININ ULUSÜSTÜLEŞMESİ VE BİR GÜVENLİK KONUSUNA DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: AVRUPA GÖÇ TARİHİNDE YENİ BİR DÖNEM Mİ?

Bu çalışma, uluslararası göçlerin bir güvenlik konusu olarak çerçevelendirilmesinin Avrupaiçin yeni bir deneyim ve göç tarihinde yeni bir dönem olup olmadığı sorusuna Avrupanınİkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası göç deneyimi ekseninde yanıt aramaktadır. Bu kapsamda göçüngüvenlik konusuna dönüşüm sürecinin Avrupanın İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası göç deneyimiiçerisindeki yeri, göç konusunun güvenlikleştirilmesinin ulusüstüleşme süreciyle paralel veayrıştırıcı yönleriyle birlikte tartışılmaktadır. Kuramsal olarak güvenlikleştirme yaklaşımıtemel alınarak Avrupanın İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası göç deneyiminin dönemleri ve Avrupaortak göç politikasının gelişimi paylaşılmakta ve çalışmanın ana sorusuna dair bu süreçlerekseninde çıkarımlar sunulmaktadır.Genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde göç, Kopenhag Ekolü tarafından da örnek olarak verilengüvenlikleştirme konularındandır. Günümüz Avrupasında hem önemli bir gündem maddesihem de önemli bir güvenlikleştirme konusu haline gelmiştir. Dolayısıyla göç konusununAvrupalılaşması, bu konuda ulusüstü düzenlemelerin oluşması ve bir güvenlik konusu olarakele alınması, Avrupa için yeni bir deneyim ve Avrupa göç tarihinde yeni bir dönem sayılabilir. Ancak önemli bir nokta, bu dönemin bir anda değil bir sürecin sonucundaoluştuğu, Avrupa tarihinin iç dinamikleri ve sömürgecilik dönemi ilişkilerine uzanan birarkaplanının bulunduğudur.

SUPRANATIONALISATION OF THE MIGRATION POLICIES IN EUROPE AND TRANSFORMATION INTO A SECURITY ISSUE: A NEW PHASE IN HISTORY OF EUROPEAN MIGRATION?

This study seeks an answer for the question whether framing migration as a security subject isa new experience in Europe and a new phase of the European migration history in the contextof the Europe s post war migration experience. The transformation of migration into asecurity subject is discussed in a perspective of its parallel and distinctive features with thesupranationalism process of migration in Europe. By taking securitization as a theoreticalbase, prominent remarks were presented with the background of Common EuropeanMigration Policy and phases of post-war migration history in Europe.Migration is one of the securitization subjects which was cited as a case by the CopenhagenSchool. It has evolved both to an important agenda item and also a securitization subject incontemporary Europe, indeed. Hence, Europeanization of migration and its transformation toa securitization subject might be seen as a new experience in Europe and a new phase ofEuropean migration history. However, it is worth to note that this is an outcome of a processand it didn t crop up suddenly. In addition Europe s own internal dynamics and even coloniallinks has been serving as a background within this securitization process.

PDF

___

Avrupa Komisyonu (2011). The Global Approach to Migration and Mobility. COM(2011) 743 final.
Bali, S. (2008). Population Movements. Security Studies as an Introduction by WILLIAMS, Paul. Routledge, 460-480
Balkır, C. (2010). Trade and Global Economy: EU and Turkey” “Europeanisation and the Role of Economic Elites in Romania, Hungary and Turkey. DEU, Graduate School of Social Sciences. 12 (2): 7-16.
Balkır, C. (2010). Uluslararası Ekonomik Bütünleşme Kuram, Politika ve Uygulama AB ve Dünya Örnekleri. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Bigo, D. (2001). The Möbius Ribbon of Internal and External Securities. Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory. Londra: University of Minnesota Press.
Bigo, D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives 27, 2002 Özel Sayısı: 63-69.
Bigo, D. (2006). Internal and External Aspects of Security. European Security. 15(4): 385- 404.
Bigo, D. (2008). Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illegal Practices of Liberal Regimes after 9/11. Londra: Routledge.
Bigo, D., Carrero, S. ve Guild, E. (2008). What Future for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice?. CEPS Policy Brief. 156.
Buonfino, A. (2004). “Politics, Discourse and Immigration as a security concern in the EU: a tale of two nations, Italy and Britain. SA Annual Conference, Londra: Lincoln.
Buzan, B. ve Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., Ole W. ve Jaap W. (1997). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Castles, Stephan ve M. J. Miller. (2008). The Age of Migration: (Turkish translation): Göçler Caği: Modern Dünyada Uluslarasi Göç Hareketleri. Istanbul: Bilgi University Press.
Checkel, J. (1999). Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly. 43(99): 83-114.
Checkel, J. (2001). Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55. Yaz: 553-581.
Duvell, F. ve Vollmer, B. (2011). European Security Challanges. Background Paper for Improving US and EU Immigration Systems. Centre on Migration, Policy and SocietyUniversity of Oxford, 2011.
Fargues, P. ve Fandrich, C. (2012). Migration after the Arab Spring. MPC Research Report 2012/9
Featherstone, K. ve Radaelli, C. (2003). The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geddes, A. (2005). Immigration and the Welfare State”. International Migration and Security: Opportunities and Challenges. Londra: Routledge.
Geddes, A. (2008). Europe’s Border Relationships and International Migration Relations. JCMS 2005. 43(4): 787–806.
Guild, E. (2009). Illiberal Liberal States: Immigration, Integration and the Citizenship in the EU. Surrey: Ashgate.
Guild, E. ve Joanne, S. (2005). International Migration and Security: Opportunities and Challanges. Londra: Routledge.
Guild, E. ve Minderhoud, P. (2006). Immigration and Criminal Law in European Union.Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Güney, A. ve Çelenk, A. (2010). Europeanization and the dilemma of decentralization: centre–local relations in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 12(3): 241-257
Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the Securitization of Migration. Journal of Common Market Studies. 38(5): 751-777.
Huysmans, J. (2006). The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. Londra: Routledge.
İçduygu, A. ve Keyman, F. (2000). Globalization, Security and Migration: The Case of Turkey. Global Governance. 6(2000): 383-393.
Kaya, A. (2009). Islam, Migration and Integration: The Age of Securitization. Londra: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mandacı, N. (2012). “Avrupa’daki Radikal Sağ Partiler ve Balkanlı Kuzenleri: Çanlar Türkiye İçin Çalıyor”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi. 9(33): 41-71.
Messina, A. (2007). The Logics and Politics of Post WWII Migration to Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Munster, R. (2009). Securitizing Immigration: The Politics of Risk in the EU. Londra: Palgrave Macmillan.
Radaelli, C. (2003). The Europeanization of Public Policy. The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schierup, C., Hansen, P. ve Castles, S. (2006). Migration, Citizenship, And the European Welfare State: A European Dilemma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Uçarer, E. (2001). Managing Asylum and European Integration: Expanding Spheres of Exclusion. International Studies Perspectives. 2001(2): 288–304.
Yıldız, A. (2008). Incorporating Migration to the European Neighborhood Policy under Demographic Challenges. Journal of Yasar University. 9 (3).
Zimmerman, K. (2005). European Migration: What do we know?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.