ORTA ASYA’DA ETKİN BÖLGESEL BÜTÜNLEŞME ÇABALARI: ŞANGHAY İŞBİRLİĞİ ÖRGÜTÜ (ŞİÖ)

Sovyetler Birliği’nin çözülmesinden sonra Orta Asya coğrafyasında yeni oluşan devletlerin ekonomik yetersizliklerinden dolayı, o bölgedeki ilk bütünleşme çabalarının zayıf kaldığı görülmüştür. Özellikle iki büyük güç olan Rusya ve Çin, ikili ilişkilerini düzeltme girişimlerini başarıyla gerçekleştirebilmeleriyle birlikte, etkin bir bölgesel bütünleşme platformunun oluşumu daha mümkün kılınabilmıştır. Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü, belirli bir etkinlik ölçüsünde hem bölgenin iktisadi dinamiklerini harekete geçirebilmekte, hem örgüte üye olan devletler arasında önemli siyasi konularda mutabakatın sağlanabilmesine katkıda bulunmaktadır. Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü, Doğu Bloku’nun çözülmesinden sonra Orta Asya bölgesinde meydana gelen genel belirsizliklerin ve otorite sorunlarının üstesinden gelebilme dürtüsünden kaynaklanan doğal bir sonuç olarak da algılanabilir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Bölgesel bütünleşme, Ekonomik yetersizlikler

EFFECTIVE REGIONAL INTEGRATION EFFORTS IN CENTRAL ASIA: THE SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION (SCO)

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, initial regional integration efforts in Central Asia have been poor due to economic shortcomings of the newly emerging post-Soviet states. Especially along with the successful attempts of the two great powers Russia and China to promote their bilateral relations, the creation of an effective regional integration project seems to be more feasible now. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization has the ability to evoke economic capacities of the region and to contribute to the achievement of a mutual understanding regarding political issues among the member states within a certain degree of effectiveness. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization could be perceived as a natural result emanating from general uncertainties and the will to overcome the power vacuum after the end of the Cold War

Keywords:

Regional integration, Economic shortcomings,

PDF

___

Austin, Greg (2002): “European Union Policy Responses to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization”, European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS) Publications, December: s. 4.
Bailes, Alyson J. K. (2007): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Europe”, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 5(3): 13-18.
Bailes, Alyson J. K., Dunay, Pál, Guang, Pan and Troitskiy, Mikhail (2007): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization”, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Policy Paper, No. 17: s. 3.
Cohen, Ariel (2006): “After the G-8 Summit: China and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization”,The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 4(3): 53- 54.
Cohen, Ariel (2006): “The U.S. Challenge at the Shanghai Summit”, The Heritage Foundation Web Memo, No. 1124: 1-3.
Craig, Timothy (2003): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Origins and Implications” (Thesis), Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, s. 12.
Dongfeng, Ren (2003): “The Central Asia Policies of China, Russia and the USA, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Process: A View from China”, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), October-December 2003, s. 8.
Gladney, Dru C. (2001), “China’s National Insecurity: Old Challenges at the Dawn of the New Millennium-Asian Perspectives on the Challenges of China”, Papers from the Asia-Pacific Symposium, s. 10.
Gonzales, Benjamin Fontaine (2001): “Charting a New Silk Road? The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Russian Foreign Policy” (Thesis), University of Oregon, s. 98.
Gorshkov, Boris (2006): “Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A Paradigm for Geopolitical Determinism”, World Affairs Review, 1(1): 30-46.
Guang, Pan (2007): “A Chinese Perspective on the Shanghai Cooperation Organization”, SIPRI Policy Paper, May, No. 17: s. 47.
Hessbruegge, Jan Arno (2004): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A Holy Alliance for Central Asia?”, The Fletcher School Online Journal for Issues Related to Southwest Asia and Islamic Civilization, Spring 2004, Article 2, s. 2.
Huasheng, Zhao (2006): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization at 5: Achievements and Challenges Ahead”, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 4(3): 105-123.
Laumulin, Murat (2006): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization as “Geopolitical Bluff?”. A View from Astana”, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 12: s. 7.
Li, Yuxin, Ni, Chaojun and Zhao, Xuran (2008): “The Status Quo and Prospects of Regional Economic Cooperation between China’s Xinjiang and Neighboring Countries under the Framework of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization”, International Journal of Business and Management, 3(1): 131-136.
Melville, Andrei and Shakleina, Tatiana (2005): “Russian Foreign Policy in Transition: Concepts and Realities”, New York: Central European University Press, s. 147-163.
Murphy, Tim (2006): “East of the Middle East: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and U.S. Security Implications”, Center for Defense Information (CDI), s. 4.
Norling, Nicklas and Swanström, Niklas (2007): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, trade, and the roles of Iran, India and Pakistan”, Central Asian Survey, 26 (3): 429-444.
Tolipov, Farkhod (2004): “On the Role of the Central Asian Cooperation Organization Within the SCO”,Central Asia and Caucasus, 3: s.1-7.
The Dushanbe Declaration by the Heads of State of the Republic of Russian Federation, and of the Republic of Tajikistan (06.07.2000).
Kunze, Thomas and Bohnet, Henri (2007): “Russische Reaktionen auf die geplanten
Diskussionspaper, August 2007, Washington, Prag, Warschau und Moskau: s. 19-20. in Osteuropa”,
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
– Wacker, Gudrun (2001): “Die “Shanghaier Organisation für Zusammenarbeit”
Eurasische Gemeinschaft oder Papiertiger?”, SWP-Studie, S 22, Berlin: s. 19.
Yuan, Jing-Dong (2003): “China and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization:
Anti-Terrorism and Beijing’s Central Asian Policy”, Politologiske Studier, 6(2): 128-139.
Zeb, Rizwan (2006): “Pakistan and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization”,
China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 4(4): 51-60.