Portfolio Balance Approach to Exchange Rate Determination: Testing a Model by Applying Bilateral Data of Turkey and United States1
Turkish economy started to be liberated in thebeginning of 1980’s and gradually to be a part ofglobal economic and financial system. But as a resultof economic articulation of Turkey to the globalworld, global economic and financial headwindshave affected trade and economy especially viaexchange rates. Since Turkey is of ever-growingforeign trade volume with global economic worlddetermination of fluctuations in exchange rates hasincreased in importance. Due to global integrationof financial markets, inflow and outflow of foreignbonds could cause economic agents to changecurrency composition of foreign assets to reducethe risks arisen from exchange rates. This situationcan negatively affect exchange rates by fluctuatingthem. Aim of this study is to empirically investigatethe portfolio balance effect on exchange rates. Inthis context, different version of Cushman’s model(2007) using monthly bilateral data of Turkeyand U.S. covering the period 2006-2016 will beemployed and portfolio balance approach to theexchange rates determination will be tested byperforming cointegration test allowing for multiplestructural breaks.
___
- Alper, A. M. (2010), “Sürdürülebilir Reel Döviz Kuru: Türkiye
Örneği”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Atış, A. G. (2008), “Türkiye’de Denge Döviz Kurunun Belirlenmesinde
Portföy Yaklaşımı”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İzmir:
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Ay A. (1996) , “Döviz Kurunun Belirlenmesinde Portföy Denge
- Modeli Yaklasımı: Türkiye Örneği (1989-1996), Yayınlanmamış
Doktora Tezi, Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Aydemir, O. ve Demirhan, E. (2009), “The Relationship between
Stock Prices and Exchange Rates Evidence from Turkey”,
International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 23,
s.207-215.
- Bai, J. ve Perron, P. (1998), “Estimating and Testing Linear
Models with Multiple Structural Changes”, Econometrica, 66,
s. 47–78.
- Bai, J. ve Perron, P. (2003), “Computation and Analysis of Multiple
Structural Change Models” Journal of Applied Econometrics,
18, s. 1–22.
- Berke, B. (2012), “Döviz Kuru ve IMKB100 Endeksi İlişkisi: Yeni
Bir Test”, Maliye Dergisi, Sayı 163, s. 243-257.
- Bisignano J. ve Hoover K. (1983), “Some Suggested Improvments
to A Simple Portfolio Balance Model of Exchange Rate
Determination with Special Reference to the US Dollar-Canadian
Dollar Rate”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 119, s.19-37.
- Black, S.W. (2013), “The Portfolio Theory of Exchange Rates-
Then and Now”, Review of International Economics, 23(2), s.
379-386.
- Branson, W. H., Haltunen, H., ve Masson, P. (1977), “Exchange
Rates in the Short Run”, European Economic Review, 10, s.
395−402.
- Branson, W. H. (1977), “Asset Markets and Relative Prices in Exchange
Rate Determination, Sozialwissenschafiliche Annalen,
1(1), s. 69-89.
- Branson, W. H. (1981), “Macroeconomic Determinants of Real
Exchange Rates,’ NBER Working Paper, No. 801, Cambridge, MA:
NBER.
- Branson, W. H. (1983), “A Model of Exchange Rate Determination
with Policy Reaction: Evidence from Monthly Data,’ NBER
Working Paper, No. 1135, Cambridge, MA: NBER.
- Branson,W.H. (1983), “Macroeconomic Determinants of Real
Exchange Risk”, R.J. Herring (ed.), Managing Foreign Exchange
Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Branson, W. H., ve Henderson, D. W. (1985), “The Specification
and Influence of Assets Markets”, R. W. Jones, & P. B. Kenen
(Eds.), Handbook of international economics, Sayı 2, Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
- Breedon, F. ve Vitale, P. (2010) “An Empirical Study of Portfolio-
balance and Information Effects of Order Flow on Exchange
Rates,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 29, s.
504–524.
- Copeland, L. (2005), “Exchange Rates and International Finance”,
Pearson Education Limited.
- Cushman, O. D. (2003), A Portfolio Balance Approach to the
Canadian- U.S. Exchange Rate, (http://homepage.usask.
ca/~doc658/PBpaper.pdf), (Erişim Tarihi: 09.10.2013), s.1-35
- Cushman, D.O. (2007), “A Portfolio Balance Approach to the
Canadian-US Exchange Rate”, Review of Financial Economics,
19, s. 305-320.
- Doğru, B. ve Recepoğlu, M. (2013), “Türkiye’de Hisse Senedi Fiyatları
ve Döviz Kuru Arasında Doğrusal ve Doğrusal Olmayan
Eş Bütünleşme İlişkisi”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler
Dergisi (Özel Sayı), s. 17-34.
- Erer, D., Erer, E. ve Güleç, T.C. (2015), “Fractional Cointegration
Analysis of Stock Market and Exchange Rates: The Case of
Turkey”, Financial Studies, 20(3).
- Fama, E.F. (1970),”Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory
and Empirical Work”, Journal of Finance, 25, s. 383-417.
- Fama, E.F. (1991),”Efficient Capital Markets: II”, Journal of
Finance, 46, s. 1575-1617.
- Fatum, R. (2015), “Foreign Exchange Intervention When Interest
Rates are Zero: Does the Portfolio Balance Channel Matter
After All?”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 57, s.
185-199.
- Frankel, J. (1983), “Monetary and portfolio balance models of
exchange rate determination”, J. Bhandari, & B. Putnam (Eds.),
Economic interdependence and flexible exchange rates, Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press, s. 84−114.
- Frankel, J. (1984), “Tests of monetary and portfolio-balance
models of exchange rate determination”, J. Bilson, & R. Marston
(Eds.), Exchange rate theory and practice Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
- Gregory, A.W. ve Hansen B.E. (1996a), “Residual Based Tests
for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts”, Journal of
Econometrics, 70, s. 99-126.
- Gregory, A.W., Hansen, B.E., (1996b), “Tests for Cointegration
in Models with Regime and Trend Shifts” Oxford Bulletin of
Economics and Statistics, 58, s. 555–560.
- Gregory, A.W., Nason, J.M. ve Watt, D.G., (1996) “Testing for
Structural Breaks in Cointegration Relationships”, Journal of
Econometrics, 71, s. 321–341.
- Hall, S.G., Hondroyiannis, G., Swamy, P.A.V.B. ve Tavlas, G.S.
(2008), “A Portfolio Balance Approach to Euro-Area Money Demand
in a Time-Varying Environment”, University of Leichester
Working Paper No. 08/9, s.1-37.
- Hatemi-J, A. (2008), “Tests for Cointegration with Two Unknown
Regime Shifts with an Application to Financial Market
Integration”, Empirical Economics, 35, s. 497–505.
- Hatemi-J, A. (2012), “Asymmetric Causality Tests with an Application”,
Empirical Economics, 43(1), s. 447–456.
- Hatemi-J, A., Al Shayeb, A. ve Roca, E. (2017), “The Effect Of
Oil Prices On Stock Prices: Fresh Evidence From Asymmetric
Causality Tests”, Applied Economics, 49(16), s. 1584-1592.
- Karacaoğlu, A. (2010), “Portföy Dengesi Yaklaşımı ve Türkiye
Örneği”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Kapetanios, G. (2005), “Unit-Root Testing against the Alternative
Hypothesis of up to m Structural Breaks” Journal of Time
Series Analysis, 26, s. 123–133.
- Khan, A. Ve Abbas, Z. (2015), “Portfolio Balance Approach:
An Empirical Testing”, Journal of Economics and International
Finance, 7(6), s. 137-143.
- Kilian, L. ve Vigfusson, R.J. (2011), “Are the Responses of U.S.
Economy Asymmetric in Energy Price Increases and Decreases?”,
Quantitative Economics, 2, s. 419-453.
- Kim, K. (1986), “An Exchange Rate Determination by Portfolio
Approach in Korea: Empirical Results”, Journal of Economic
Integration, 1(2), s. 194-208.
- Lewis, K.K. (1986), “Testing the Portfolio Balance Model: A
Multi-Lateral Approach”, Journal of International Economics,
24, s. 109-127.
- MacDonald, R. (2007), “Exchange Rate Economics: Theories
and Evidence”, Taylor & Francis Group: Taylor & Francis E-Library.
- Maki, D. (2012), “Tests for Cointegration Allowing for an
Unknown Number of Breaks”, Economic Modelling, 29, s. 2011-
2015.
- Mark, N.C. (1995), “Exchange Rates and Fundamentals: Evidence
on Long-Horizon Predictability”, The American Economic
Review,85(1), s. 201-218.
- Markowitz, H. (1952), “Portfolio Selection”, The Journal of Finance,
7, No.1, s. 77-91.
- Min, H.G. ve McDonald, J. (1993), “The Portfolio Balance Model
of Exchange Rates: Short-Run Behavior and Forecasting (The
Korean Won/U.S. Dollar Case)”, International Economic Journal,
4, s. 75-87.
- Nwafor; F. (2008), “Portfolio Balance Model of Exchange Rate
Behavior: A Peso-Dollar Example”, The Icfai University Journal of
Financial Economics, 6, s.41-47.
- Öcal, M. S. (1990), “Döviz Kurunun Belirlenmesinde Portfölyo
Yaklaşımı ve Türkiye Üzerine Bir Deneme (1985-1989)”, Yayınlanmamış
Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Öruç, E. (2016), “Döviz Kurlarının Belirlenmesinde Parasalcı
Yaklaşım: Türkiye Örneği”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimle r
Dergisi, 32, s. 101-122.
- Pekkaya, M. ve Bayramoğlu, M. F., “Hisse Senedi Fiyatları ve
Döviz Kuru Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: YTL/USD, IMKB100
ve S&P500 Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Muhasebe ve Finansman
Dergisi, Sayı 38, s. 163-176.
- Tze-Haw, C., Teck, L.C. ve Chee-Wooi, H. (2013), “Forecasting
Malaysian Ringgit: Before and After the Global Crisis”, AAMJAF,
9(2), s. 157-175.
- Umer, U.M, Güven, S. ve Kamışlı, S. (2015), “The Dynamic Linkages
between Exchange Rates and Stock Prices: Evidence from
Emerging Markets”, Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis,
4(3), s. 17-32.
- Yılancı, V. Ve Bozoklu, Ş. (2015), “Analysis of Symmetric and
Asymmetric Nonlinear Causal Relationship Between Stock
Prices and Exchange Rates for Selected Emerging Market
Economies”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 16(2), s. 155-164.